Right-wing extremists want to give state legislatures power to overturn federal elections — and finish what they started after the 2020 election. How? Here’s their scheme.
First, years of gerrymandering and dark money have built obedient Republican state legislatures — just look what red states did to abortion rights.
Next they turn to The Court That Dark Money Built. Years of packing extremists onto the Court and political pressure have brought an obedient Court supermajority to power.
Then they send in dark-money front groups like the Honest Elections Project, which has filed an amicus brief in the Supreme Court that lays out the plan. Who is this group?
Honest Elections Project calls itself a “nonpartisan organization devoted to supporting the right of every lawful voter to participate in free and honest elections.” Wrong. This group promotes voter suppression under the guise of “election integrity.”
Now look at the “independent state legislature” theory that this group is pushing, which says that the Constitution forbids state courts to block any law state legislatures pass about federal elections – even if the laws violate the state constitution.
Rings a bell? It’s the theory pushed by Trumpster John Eastman to overturn the 2020 election (he also filed an amicus brief in this case). If the GOP justices go along, it would unwind our democracy as we know it.
Under this theory, radical, gerrymandered state legislatures could try to impose almost any voting restrictions. It could end independent commissions that prevent gerrymandering and other laws that protect voting rights.
And extremists like Eastman hope that it would even let them pick election winners, overriding the state’s popular vote.
The fringe doctrine they’re pushing first cropped up in — of all places — Bush v. Gore (three FedSoc Justices were involved in Bush v Gore, btw), but SCOTUS never adopted it. Yet three R justices (Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch) have endorsed it.
The extremists think they won’t need to sack the Capitol next time. Just (illegally) fix the vote in Republican state legislatures and run it up to the captured Supreme Court for a rubber stamp. Bingo — Bush v. Gore 2.0.
This is what the Scheme to capture SCOTUS was for: creating a captured Court amenable to extreme ideologies that serve Republican big donor interests.
Who was behind this Scheme? The same guy behind the Honest Elections Project: Leonard Leo, who from his Federalist Society perch stocked the Court with Roberts, Alito, and three Trump justices.
And Leo’s Honest Elections Project isn’t even a real group. It’s a legal “fictitious name” of another group that also operates under other “fictitious names,” including the Judicial Crisis Network.
The Judicial Crisis Network took in checks as big as $17 million to run TV political ads for Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett. The whole Court Capture Scheme looks to have cost more than $580 million — the big donors weren’t messing around.
The Federalist Society became their dark-money turnstile, grooming and selecting loyal judges. How do we know? Trump plus his White House Counsel plus FedSoc founder plus a Republican Senate Judiciary chair all bragged about it. Not subtle.
Recap: the Justices put on the Court via Leo’s FedSoc are getting marching orders from Leo’s Honest Elections Project, which under a different “fictitious name” also funded the TV ads to confirm the Justices. Not normal.
To cap it all off: Leo also just got a $1.6B political slush fund from a far-right billionaire to influence our politics using right-wing dark money schemes. It worked for Court capture; what’s next?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Trump is slowly figuring out that it was the Koch operation that chose, and is served by, “his” Supreme Court nominees, and that “his” people Leo and McGahn were really working for the polluter billionaires.
Let’s review the history. 🧵
Remember, in 2016 election Koch political operation attacked Trump relentlessly, until the so-called “Federalist Society list,” which FedSoc never considered or approved. That was misdirection, hiding that it was really a Leo/Koch/polluter list.
Every clue is that there was a deal; Kochs knew better than to trust Trump, so they got a public list — and their guy McGahn into the White House. The Kochs laid off attacking Trump, and hoped for the promised SCOTUS picks.
Trump’s mad rant unloads on Court-fixer Leonard Leo — has Trump FINALLY figured out that he was chumped big-time by Leo, McGahn and the creepy billionaires (Koch) who REALLY controlled “his” judicial appointments? Slow learner.
It looks like House of Trump cut a deal in the 2016 election with House of Koch, to back off on attacking Trump in return for Koch minions controlling Trump’s appointments. Leo was their minion — and Trump was clueless? Some “Art of the Deal”!
The Kochs knew Trump couldn’t be trusted — he had the worst business reputation in America. Hence the so-called “Federalist Society list” of SCOTUS noms (in which the FedSoc had no actual role) to lock Trump in publicly — also Leo/McGahn/Koch orchestrated.
This looney-tunes right-wing group’s complaint against Roberts was an effort to ferret out my correspondence on judicial ethics matters with the Judicial Conference. dailykos.com/stories/2025/5…
Other efforts against my work with the Judicial Conference included an invective-heavy letter from Mitch McConnell attacking judges for wanting better amicus disclosure and faux outrage from the WSJ Polluter Page.
What’s loopy about this complaint is that each branch of government properly performs internal “legislative,” “judicial,” and “executive” functions (customarily referred to as “quasi” to reflect that they are properly within the respective branches).
Let me get this straight: the party that defends dark money, which by definition can come from overseas since the donor is kept secret, is complaining about foreign influence? nytimes.com/2025/04/24/us/…
And the guy who benefited from Russian money, pouring in to influence our American elections to try and help him get elected, is the guy leading the charge?
Do they know that ActBlue delivers *declared* contributions under federal disclosure laws and regulations?
And that Trump and the Republicans would sink into insignificance and lose every election were they not floated by fossil fuel polluter money routed through front groups, 501c4s, and on to big-money superPACs?
It’s incredibly weird how many people around Trump seem to get an unhealthy pleasure from other people’s pain, distress, and humiliation. It seems abnormal.
🧵
It’s weird and twisted how fixated they are on a brutal Salvadoran prison, and taking photos with people behind bars, and bent-over shaved men. (Even caging children at the border, back in Trump One.)
It’s weird how they derive joy from firing perfectly harmless people and walking them out of their offices on short notice between security personnel. And how often it’s women who get that humiliating treatment.