The best of Indians are raised to be betabuxx beyond imagination, and any sign of agency is crush at childhood - a domesticated animal whose survival is for sake of social security of past generation.
No great person would be born in your race, and if born, would be smothered.
Parenting is cancerous because Pajeetas either subconsciously hate their children by transferring their hatred for their husbands onto children, or make their sons their surrogate husbands.
I would write my critique of second degree effect of traditionalism in separate thread.
For demography, you need to study it like microbiology.
A feature among proles across culture and time is that whenever resource frontier increase, they multiply to exhaust it to point of ecological disaster.
What would happen when they are provided with stability of family?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Children in India are birthed for sake of social security & karma token generation of birthing generation.
Thus subconsciously birthing generation promotes those things which would increase earning potential of birthed generation or bring them intangible goods.
Actions which lets you monkey branch is discouraged.
In-fact not limited to India. Individualism is globally rare, and a product of cultural change caused by humanism.
Children have been produced for millenias for social security, or extra pair of hand in field & factories.
That argument is at core of Marxist theory of labour.
Things got extra bad in India because:
1. Pajeets put everything in religion. The copes which should had been kept separate have become its central part. I would put this up to lack of central authority.
That is true, but one should also know the evil they wished for.
Due to seeing daughter as a burden - they would eat into family resources and would take away wealth as dowry- and seeing marrying them in a family of lower status as loss of prestige; Pajeets and Pajeetas
embarked on industrial scale murder of girl childs. 3 in 10 girl child were murdered in wombs, but that is only due to GoI being forced to recordkeep.
British civil servants cum anthropologist noted in 1800s that when a girl child was born in Rajasthan' villages,
It is horrendous. I consider it evil for following reason.
1. Suppose you find a group with outrageously abhorrent culture and practices, you either force them to change their ways or put them all to sword. This "Plz do not marry out of caste birather" is a sign of retardation.
2. It is dysgenic. India had & has castes of highway robbers and prostitutes. It did not occurred to any of the kangs here that this is an abomination, and it took Britishers to make highways somewhat safe.
Every society has caste type structure, but when you formalize it,
and close to even hypothetical avenues of thottery, you gimp hypergamy and ensure a stable family & exponential breeding opportunity to lowest of proles.
3. It is a cancer on soul of best of its men; not just caste but whole superstructure associated with it.