"The two main writers were unfortunately of Jewish descent, a Schapiro - their education writer who for years hasn't been hiding her venom against yeshivas - and a Rosenthal."
--Satmar newspaper "Der Yid"
Der Yid is very excited that the @nytimes article set Satmar as the leader that sets the tone for other schools. They see it as confirming their superiority over other Hasidic groups.
The NYT article "complains that [yeshivas] censor books from immoral things - without explaining why this is supposed to be a problem."
--Der Yid
(Apparently the Times was supposed to explain that the word "girl" is not immoral, and why it is a problem to erase it.)
"The statement by @NYCMayor was stongly welcomed, in which he boldly responded to questions saying that he doesn't care what the @nytimes says."
--Der Yid
"The Satmar Rebbe [rabbi Zalman] announced, we will never cooperate! ... we are ready to go to prison."
--Der Yid
Der Blatt, the newspaper of the competing Aroni Satmar faction, is even crazier than Der Yid in general and in regards to #YeshivaGate. So much of it isn't even translatable.
I'll leave one piece here from the editorial.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The word is in the Hasidic community that the tests that the @nytimes based the scores on, were deliberately done wrong by the Hasidic yeshivas, to enable the yeshivas to be designated as low-performing, and thus benefit from additional programs.
1/4
(This theory might be true in the sense that the yeshivah leaders didn't care that the tests score so badly, and didn't have the test-answers handed out to the students. But let's work with the theory that's going around in the community as a response to the 0% test scores.)
2/4
Now think about it:
According to this theory, yeshiva leaders, who want us to think that they have our best interests in mind, had the stupefying arrogance and chutzpah to send to the State 0-scoring tests, WHILE THEY KNEW THAT THE EDUCATION IN OUR YESHIVAS IS UNDER SCRUTINY!
3/4
As a Hasidic father, it’s time for an honest assessment of the @nytimes article by @elizashapiro. What did it get right, and what not perfectly.
While the sorry state of education in our yeshivas was understated, the prevalence of physical abuse is not as bad as it seems.
1/8
Let’s start with ed. While the article was clear that Hasidic yeshivas deny their students a secular education, one might come away with the impression that students do get education in Yiddish or Hebrew writing or Jewish history. The sad fact is that none of this happens. 2/8
The vast majority of Hasidic men cannot write a simple essay in ANY language. That’s why the Times translation in Yiddish really shook up the community, because we all know that there are only a couple of handfuls of Hasidic people who can write a perfect Hasidic Yiddish. 3/8
Got into an argument here on Twitter, after I was accused of understating the severity of someone's crimes. I have no problem accepting that my choice of words was bad. My point might have been wrong altogether; and even if right, it wasn't said clearly enough.
But a Twitter "comrade" wrote to me privately, "I got DM’s from women 'I thought he was a normal one.'"
I'd say, If hundreds and hundreds of tweets I wrote made you think I'm "a normal one," and suddenly one tweet you don't like changes your mind, you've got an issue.
How about say, "since I've been impressed with this guy's tweets for a while, perhaps I'm not completely understanding what he's trying to say"?
Or, "this man in utterly wrong this time -- I guess normal people can sometimes take on odd positions"?