Over the past 24 hours, I’ve been asked by journalists all over the world whether my research suggests their country might be among the two dozen countries where Russian money has infiltrated politics. Nowhere is this question coming up more than in Italy. reuters.com/world/europe/r…
The US intel assessment reportedly names countries included in my research, like Montenegro & Madagascar, plus some new ones, like Albania, Ecuador, & an unnamed Asian country (where the Russian ambassador gave millions in cash to a presidential candidate).washingtonpost.com/national-secur…
To see the 33 countries identified in my report on #CovertForeignMoney as having receiving political financing from Kremlin-linked actors, see where the red arrows point to in the map below. One of these target countries is Italy.
For a refresher on how Matteo Salvini went to Moscow and secretly struck a deal to bankroll Lega’s 2019 European election campaign with discounted oil profits from Russia, see the case study below from my research on #CovertForeignMoney. Full report: securingdemocracy.gmfus.org/covert-foreign…
Frontrunner Giorgia Meloni threatened to sue an Italian newspaper just for asking whether she had taken Russian money.
SLAPPing around the free press is the kind of behavior we expect from Russian oligarchs (or wannabes like @Arron_banks).
Other interests aside, helping elect a prime minister who threatens the media would strike me as advancing the Kremlin’s “covert campaign to weaken democratic systems,” to which “Moscow planned to spend hundreds of millions of dollars” in the months ahead.washingtonpost.com/national-secur…
And here’s my conversation with @StefanoVergine, the investigative journalist who broke the story about Salvini’s 2019 attempt to fund Lega with Kremlin-arranged oil money. ilfattoquotidiano.it/in-edicola/art…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
It’s dangerously naive to view Trump as simply another “isolationist” whose foreign policy echoes nothing darker than Americans’ historical urges to pull back from the world.
Kupchan argues that Trump’s unilateralism strongly resembles the US isolationist grand strategy first articulated in George Washington’s 1796 farewell address, which set out a “policy to steer clear of permanent alliances” that lasted until the attack on Pearl Harbor in 1941.
This piece is an embarrassment to @ForeignPolicy, which should issue a retraction.
It's by a MidEast columnist who cherrypicked quotes and facts to weave her own narrative that'll now be used by the Kremlin's useful idiots to undermine support for Ukraine.foreignpolicy.com/2024/07/29/ukr…
What’s the basis for claiming in the opening sentence that corruption has undermined Ukraine’s fight against Russia?
It’s certainly not supported by the first former official quoted in the piece, who says just the opposite—that reforms aren’t the issue stopping Ukraine from joining NATO.
This reform brings Ukraine in compliance with the @FATFNews standard of making banks closely scrutinize the finances of politically exposed persons or PEPs (i.e., former public officials who could benefit from corruption) for the rest of their lives, rather than just three years.
As background, see this article in @EuropeanPravda.
PEP reform was "the last main obstacle to the [EU] negotiations" and Zelensky's government was having a hard time getting its proposal through the parliament due to opposition among lawmakers who don't want to be lifelong PEPs.
Even as Ukrainian generals and soldiers fight to expel Russian invaders, a second army of state bureaucrats and civil society experts in Kyiv has been quietly mobilizing to win the peace.
Two new reports from @gmfus, @brdo_ukraine, @IAAUkraine, & @RISE_Ukraine_ map these actors.
As we've spoken to officials planning for a Marshall Plan for Ukraine, we've realized they often don't have a clear picture of all the new government bodies and civil society coalitions that have sprout up in Kyiv to prepare for reconstruction.
That's why we did this research.
Our first report, led by @brdo_ukraine, focuses on Ukrainian government institutions. ⬇️gmfus.org/news/kyivs-mob…
Wow! I had heard that this was in the works, but the details are strikingly strong. 💪
Good of the @WhiteHouse for sending the G7 donor coordination platform this list of 25 reforms that Ukraine must implement in order to continue receiving US assistance. news.yahoo.com/white-house-le…
Two of my favorite aspects of this list are how the priorities are sequenced over the next 18 months and how they've prioritized reforms to give the specialized anti-corruption agencies more resources and authorities, with specific line items for SAPO, NABU, NACP, HACC, and ARMA.
If you think that's an alphabet soup of esoteric bureaucracy, Putin disagrees. In his vitriolic speech three days before fully invading, he named these Ukrainian anti-corruption institutions and bemoaned their leadership selection processes and US support. en.kremlin.ru/events/preside…
NEW REPORT: Ukraine is halfway through a hero’s journey with a dual conflict against Russia and oligarchy.
Ukrainian anti-corruption is vital to the rules-based order. @NormEisen, Cameron Bertron, and I offer 25 ways stakeholders in that order can help. 🧵gmfus.org/news/ukraines-…
We start by setting the record straight on Ukrainian anti-corruption.
Here's what the Kremlin and its useful idiots leave out from their narrative about corruption in Ukraine:
Never in history has a nation built such a sweeping array of anti-corruption institutions in a decade.
This success drove Putin to invade. See what he did on the date of Feb 21 – a year apart, in 2021 & 2022.
2/21/2021: Started mobilizing “large-scale exercises” hours after Medvedchuk’s assets seized
2/21/2022: Named Ukraine’s rule-of-law institutions in his vitriolic war speech