The #cesletter doesn’t disprove any core claims of the Latter-day Saints.
But its effectiveness in creating doubt among so many demonstrates we’ve done a poor job explaining revelation, and it’s limitations.
This thread is my attempt to begin that discussion. 1/13
I propose we lay out some principles of revelation to help us understand what it is and isn’t, and what it’s like receiving it.
To be clear, this is not me just trying to force something to work. It’s based, not only on personal experience, but also in scripture. 2/13
There’s likely more than what I’ve identified (please feel free to contribute!)… But here’s a few principles of revelation I believe we should bear in mind always, including when encountering critiques like those found in the CES Letter.
PRINCIPLE #3: Those who receive revelation don’t understand the full implications of what they are articulating.
See Jonah 4: 1-2
See examples of dual fulfillment (en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dual_fulf…), for example, Isaiah 14: 12-17 refers to both Satan and the King of Babylon.
6/13
PRINCIPLE #4: The articulation of revelation is always limited by language and skewed by the receiver’s bias.
See…
- 1 Corinthians 2:14
-Romans 8: 26-27
7/13
PRINCIPLE #5: The only qualification of a revelator is that they receive divine revelation. Their sins are many, and they do not always act in God’s name. But this doesn’t detract from when they are acting as his agent.
See the unending mistakes of biblical prophets.
8/13
PRINCIPLE #6: Revelation is a meeting of minds between God and man, and so it is unsurprising that we find an intermingling of man’s voice, culture and reference points with the pattern and mind of divinity.
See…
-Isaiah 1:18
-D&C 50: 10-12
D&C 1:24
9/13
PRINCIPLE #7: Revelation does not come until we ask the right question, with real intent… Even for prophets.
See…
-2 Nephi 32:4
-Moroni 10: 4-5
-Many others…
10/13
Principle #8: Revelation is best equipped to help us understand moral truth, and our goal should be less about describing the material world, and more about learning how to act in it.
See all of scripture 😬
11/13
Principle #9: Despite the difficulty and susceptibility of the revelatory process, it is necessary… because you must have a value system to perceive and act in the world (there’s too much data otherwise), and values are never empirically based.
12/13
PRINCIPLE #10: Those who disbelieve in the revelatory process like to borrow the assumptions proposed by those actually searching for transcendent truth, while simultaneously criticizing the foundation of the value system they’re using.
It’s easy to criticize.
13/13
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The Bible laid the philosophical foundation for science.
But, Christianity’s incomplete understanding paved the way for its own dissolution into nihilistic atheism.
The restored gospel provides key insights to maintain a scientific view, sans the nihilism.
Here’s how… 1/19
Christianity had to contend with several world views (which would have proven antithetical to science) before it could emerge to shape the modern world. Chief among those was Ancient Greek philosophy.
The Greek and Judeo-Christian philosophies actually complimented 2/19
each other quite well in many ways, and the study of those ancient philosophers helped Christianity develop.
But, there was a crucial problem at the foundation of such philosophies, which proved to cripple human progress. It said that, when we 3/19
A 19th century unschooled farm boy, dictating, in a 3 month period, over 500 pages of internally consistent narrative and well crafted prose, containing:
-Over 200 named characters
-Over 150 named locations
-Several distinct cultures
-3 calendar systems 1/7
-A workable system of weights and measurements
-Genealogies
-Realistic descriptions of battles and war strategy
-Multiple literary genres
-Distinct writing voices
-Profound, innovative and biblically sound theological discourses
-Over 1,000 intertextual relationships 2/7
-Over 1,000 examples Hebrew literary elements, with over 50 unique Hebraisms.
-Internally consistent geographical relationships
-Complicated plots containing flashbacks within flashbacks
-Compelling archetypal narratives- death and rebirth, hero archetypes, etc. 3/7
Religion, at its core, is the process of discovering and acting out axiomatic beliefs without material evidence that they should be accepted.
Perception isn’t possible without axioms. There’s no such thing as a non-religious person, nor a non-religious society. 1/6
The only question is… What is your religion centered on? Truth or lies?
But how do you tell a true axiom from a false one if, like I said, there is no material evidence to support one over the other?
This kind of truth is only discovered through experience. 2/6
As man acts in the world, attempting to make sense of the chaos, his soul resonates, and his mind envisions certain desired outcomes. He knows these are good, because they speak to his humanity, and his natural desire to transcend the suffering of his current state. 3/6
There is a hedonistic, selfish libertinism that has taken hold of the Left, and also certain elements of the Right.
There is always a balance that must be struck between the oppressive culture and the deadly chaos it protects us from. But so many today have lived in the lap 1/5
of luxury for so long, they have no notion of the horror that ensues when modern society breaks down.
For ages, humans have found purpose in taking their role, their place, in society and fulfilling it well. This did, though, become overly prescriptive and oppressive. 2/5
But now, you are only “living your truth” and being “authentic” if you completely reject every rule, every role, every responsibility.
Liberty is no longer coupled with responsibility. Instead, liberty means constituting the universe however you see fit… no boundaries, 3/5
Nitpick the Book of Mormon all you want, but there is no better antidote to the postmodern problem than Alma 32.
Is there an infinite number of ways to interpret the world? Yes. But you can’t just throw whatever crap you want into the ground and grow a fruitful tree. 1/10
You also can’t just throw a good seed into the ground and fail to nourish it.
And there are an infinite number of things you could hypothetically do to the seed, or to the young tree. But there are very specific things you MUST do if you want a tree that bears good fruit. 2/10
And as it “swelleth and sprouteth and beginneth to grow,” you still will not understand everything. You still won’t have all your questions answered.
But contrary to the postmodernist’s insistence, this doesn’t actually matter so much. Because, remember what you do know… 3/10