Many will know I've been going through a slowly unrolling identity crisis, as I try to grapple with the UK I thought I knew, and the UK I'm beginning to see with fresh eyes. The events around the Queen's death have brought this into sharper focus. What country are we? 🧵
My middle class background, my loyalist/royalist family and social circle, and my long career as a "Crown" civil servant, proud to be briefly titled "Her Majesty's Ambassador", and to have even met the Queen, mean I have strong embedded feelings of deference/respect to👑& 🇬🇧
I genuinely admired the Queen, if only for keeping her calm and dignity through decades of change, and some truly difficult personal and political moments. As the Head of State for 70 years, of course this is a big, historic moment. She's been there, steady, all my life. and...
I believe many of the tributes have been deeply moving and heartfelt. The ceremonies have been beautiful. The events in Scotland and NI (not yet Wales, however?) possess great symbolism about the Union. The crowds queueing patiently in line testify to the public's affection. BUT
We've had a change of Head of State, and a Change of PM in 10 days, with the vast majority of us having absolutely no say in this process. I know this is how our constitution works (spare me the lessons, pls), but why does it work this way? Why do we accept this unquestioningly?
Why does the coverage of the Queen's death and the King's accession assume that we all feel the same reverence; and that everything must come to a halt to pay tribute to this moment? Why are those who feel differently being bullied into silence, or even in a few cases arrested?
Why is it taken for granted that we must all grieve the same way? Why do these stultifying conventions exist that say the royals must parade their grief in public, march a certain way, speak a certain way? I am torn between admiring their stoic poses, and finding it grotesque.
Commentators are droning on endlessly about unity, reconciliation, this being a time to come together in sorrow and respect. Many are opining about our heritage and our history, but also the need to reflect our changing times, our changing world, our multicultural society.
Then I come on twitter, and find bitter, nasty, vindictive, comments directed at people who dare to question the role of the Monarchy, or how events are being conducted, or what they cost; and an outpouring of hatred towards the only non-white member of the royal family.
Tributes to the Queen celebrate her lifetime of service, selfless devotion to the country, and hard work, right to the very end of her life. Meanwhile, our government in its wisdom has facilitated a virtual halt to nearly all aspects of public life, parliament, business, etc.
The juxtaposition between the weary, bloodied soldiers in Ukraine engaged in real fighting for their real freedom, and the pantomime ceremonial military events taking place here are extremely jarring. Where once I loved our pageantry, much of it now seems out of date and OTT.
Part of me still watches the events with fascination and nostalgia. Part of me feels like I am watching a circus, with paid performers and mannequins. "Oh what a circus, oh what a show".
I don't want to feel this way. I want to wallow comfortably in sentimental nostalgia for the greatness of our Queen and country. But I find the growing gap between our exceptional sense of ourselves, and the actual reality of our political and economic condition hard to ignore.
I am not instinctively a revolutionary. But the longer these events go on, the more I find myself wanting to push back. While the media is focused almost exclusively on these public events, I worry what the government is up to in private, away from any scrutiny.
I ask, for how long will we remain passive, loyal "subjects"? When will we become more active, engaged citizens? How long will we revel complacently in our glorious past? When will we face up, honestly, to our uncertain future? How long will we stay asleep? When will we wake up?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
@MarchForRejoin@snb19692 I havered for weeks on whether to support campaign to rejoin EU - too difficult, too soon, would EU even have us back, we'd never get same terms as before, time to move on etc..; I was talking myself out of it. Then I changed my mind. Here's why 🧵
We live in a democracy, where one vote, one time, is not binding for all time. If govt can seek to rip up terms of deal it negotiated, so can we, in the other direction. The ink is barely dry on the deal. If not now, when?
If you care about the quality of our govt and democracy, it seems to have got worse since we left EU, and direction is not encouraging. If this is what we choose to do with our new found "sovereignty", I want none of it.
Drinking very strong cups of tea this morning, reading the news. Feeling tired, demoralized, and deeply worried. How did it come to this? The crisis is not just economic, but across our political institutions, public services, society, nation, and international standing.
I believe this government will offer NOTHING to address these problems. Instead it will fan the flames with more divisive policies, designed to appeal to its base, but at cost of further division, inequality, instability in NI, possible trade war with EU.
As a diplomat, it’s the lack of strategic vision which depresses most. Short term, small minded domestic policies, and continued bashing of the EU, introducing friction into alliance on Ukraine. Why? Party interests before country again?
The comments and quotes on this suggest the biggest damage is to our society, which seems increasingly bitter and riven. Whether you were for or against Brexit, I yearn for some grace to return to our political discourse, and for us to be able to debate issues without slurs.
I hate the gloating and sneering of some many Brexit supporters; but also the condescending attacks by some on the Remain side depicting all Brexit supporters as bigoted or stupid. I strongly opposed the decision to leave, but recognize they had their reasons, and EU not nirvana.
Rather than endlessly relitigate the past, I want to try to make best, +ve case for resuming coop'n and improving rel's again with EU. That includes exposing lies and dishonest arguments made by our govt, but constant vilification of everything is (imo) counterproductive.
Doubling down a bit, my husband also once observed how struck he was at how the British were always recalling what a great country we used to be...focussed more on our glorious past than hopeful future. Pls read my whole thread for clarification..there's a serious point here 🧵
He made this comment after being fed up of hearing my somewhat snobbish mother, for umpteenth time, point out a grand house we were driving by, to note that it once belonged to Hall Hall family. He couldn't see what was the source of pride in that, since we'd actually lost it.
Years back, my mother scolded a different (also foreign) boyfriend of mine who was about to use one of our "family" china plates for breakfast..."you can't use that, it's hundreds of years old!". He asked "well, why don't you buy a new one then?!" You should have seen her face!
I also remember during the early days of Covid, Tony Blair making repeated sensible interventions, including increasing time between first and second vaccine shots. I remember when we used to have Cabinets full of grown ups, with talent, and industry and creativity 🧵1/10
I happened to be working in the Cabinet Office in last few months of Major govt, and first few months of Blair govt. Though Major also had some decent Ministers, the calibre of Cabinet discussion under Blair was of totally different order.
I was working on EU policy. Major’s cabinet (under pressure from usual right wing nut jobs…eg IDS, Michael Howard) would discuss fantastical notions to appease them, and insult EU. The cabinet radiated fatigue and cynicism. Blair Cabinet would discuss what was best for the UK.
Right upfront, identifies amongst challenges facing UK a chronic labour shortage, and low birth rate…yet also argues that allegedly high rates of immigration are presenting huge social and economic costs…though immigration (or FOM) is easiest way to resolve our labour problems.
Laments “identity” politics in UK, but then argues we must do more to promote “Britishness”….which is also a form of identity politics, but one which he finds acceptable…perhaps because his preferred notion of Britishness is male, pale and stale?