Reification (treating people as objects) gives people permission--people can think of themselves as good people who care & do the right thing so long as they convince themselves that these people aren't real people. Slavery, genocide, capitalism, etc all work on this principle.
If they're not people, then they don't count. What are they if they're not people?
A problem, a threat, dangerous, a plague, an invasion, a Trojan horse, rats, cancer, cockroaches, rapists, drug dealers, murderers, etc.
The word "immigrant" itself is a condensation symbol ("a name, word, phrase, or maxim which stirs vivid impressions involving the listener's most basic values and readies the listener for action")--immigrants aren't people, but a category of threat that motivates people to act.
Categories of immigrant/migrant/asylum seeker are collapsed--there is no "good immigrant" anymore on the right because of the way that all immigrants have been reified as a dangerous threat (a smooshing together of all of the ways they've been reified).
So how do you get people to be less afraid of what they've learned to fear most? Weirdify and Humanize. Fight reification by explaining how the strategy works and turning objects back into people. Treat the reifiers as people too--what are they afraid of? Why are they afraid?
Cultivate empathy on both sides. There are autocratic leaders who know very well that these are people in need of our help, but those leaders cynically position immigrants as hate-objects. Their followers learn to see the issue through this frame and it becomes real to them.
Most people have no actual first hand information about this issue (I'm not on the boarder or in the airports, checking IDs and passports and papers). They only know about immigrant through the media/elites who frame reality. They've been told to be afraid & to reify & to hate.
It is awful to be dehumanized and turned into a scary hate-object. It is also awful to be terrorized and manipulated by your media and political leaders for profit and power. We're all vulnerable to being reified & terrorized in this way.
Sadly, it's central to our political discourse today. The really big lie is "politics is war and the enemy cheats," which is a reification that condones all other reifications.
Kant applies here. People are ends, not means. Republican discourse today is anti-Enlightenment rationality, which is why it's so hard to argue against with arguments. You're bringing Enlightenment norms, values & methods to a pre-Enlightenment fight.
I'm going to keep doing "weirdify" threads like this one. I hope folks find them useful!
Weirdify (v): to make weird, the opposite of "normalize." A way of breaking down and exposing fascist rhetoric. Normalize democracy; weirdify fascism.
A democrat is someone who is motivated by freedom, equality, social justice, and political practices that allow all citizens to meaningfully share power. Democracy is a way of life, it’s also a way of thinking & communicating. So is fascism.
Here is a great thread that gives context to the situation and helps to humanize the people involved:
Here's another way to think of immigrants: they are what makes America, America. When they become citizens they actively consent to our Constitution. They are ambitious and want a better life for themselves and their families. None of that is scary, it's hopeful and joyful.
Allowing immigrants to be framed as hate-objects makes both them and you less human: “when you adopt the standards and the values of someone else … you surrender your own integrity [and] become, to the extent of your surrender, less of a human being.”--Eleanor Roosevelt
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
"An elderly man, pale and weak in mind, body, and morals, stands on a stage in front of an adoring crowd. He appears before them in disguise—orange make-up and dark bronzer attempt to give his pale skin a color that suggests youthfulness."
"A cotton candy-like confection of bright blond hair-stuff covers his head, suggesting an angelic vitality. His voice is loud, he talks rough, suggesting strength and a powerful toughness. His suit is tailored to cover up his aged and deformed body."
"Shoe lifts give him height but also make him tilt forward awkwardly—and clumsily. His loyal audience doesn’t see with their own eyes but with his. Likewise, they don’t hear him with their own ears. They hear only what he wants them to hear."
Things I've seen that show me people still don't get what 2024 is about:
"We've already seen what Trump is like as president, it will be like that."
"He can't do that."
If Trump wins, his 2nd term won't be anything like his first. It will be much worse. Laws won't stop him.
Democratic erosion scholars call this "competitive authoritarianism"--it's the way that most democracies go authoritarian now--coups with the veneer of still being democratic:
I've tried to explain this before: Trump thinks he was too nice the last time he was president. He's pissed that his generals & staff prevented him from doing what he wanted while president, made him leave the WH when he lost. He wants unlimited power.
WARNING: anyone thinking of paying anyone to vote a certain way OR anyone accepting money to vote a certain way is violating 18 US Code 597 and will be punished with fines and/or two years in jail.
Like, just FYI. There are actual laws against accepting money for votes.
Reminds me of when I teach political campaigning and we talk about GOTV strategies and I have to tell my students that there are actual laws and most of their ideas for getting folks to vote are illegal.
Here are three explainers that might be helpful for thinking about why Trump's Big Election Lie worked on his followers, why they still believe it, and why even this mountain of evidence may not change their minds.
One of the biggest weaknesses of fascist leaders is they refuse to listen to advice. They’re afraid of appearing weak. They don’t want to acknowledge that other people know more than they do. They’re cognitively irresponsible, they want the authority to declare reality.
One thing you learn when you become an expert in something is how little you know compared to how much there is to know. When you speak to a lot of experts you learn how many other things there are to know and how impossible it would be to be an expert in more than one thing.
Subject matter experts are valuable, we’re much smarter together than we are in isolation. Autocrats never want to admit that. They treat experts as threats to the autocrat’s authority (they are) & try to punish experts or force them to comply with the authoritarian’s “truth.”
You might wonder why Trump would take the time to make an all-caps tweet stating his (apparently very strong) negative feelings about the world's biggest pop star. Trump treats all women as objects (he reifies them): all women are either treasured objects or hated objects.
Women are "treasured objects" when they make Trump look good. Women are "hated objects" when they refuse to capitulate to Trump & make him look bad. He gets in his feelings bigly when a popular, attractive, successful woman defies him. He's truly the smallest man who ever lived.