Thread by @BenMChia

🪡 1. A timeline and thread🧵 of the deviousness of Christopher Bouzy that started with a simple question and pointing out mistakes in Bot Sentinel's latest report. It all started when @IanRunkle pointed out the misleading and misrepresenting portion (img1)

2. Rather than acknowledge the error, my man doubled down (img2 & 3) and in img 3, even screenshot the pre-edited report showing quotes from more than 6 hours apart, placed together in a single quote to make them appear more damaging. So...misrepresentation.

3. After Mr Runkle made this video () pointing out all the errors, Bot Sentinel finally made changes to the report.

4. HOWEVER, after making the changes, there was no disclosure (which anyone who does actual research would know, is an ethical breach for undocumented changes after publishing). Bottom left and bottom right quotes are still misrepresented and taken out of context explained above.

5. So...all he needed to do was acknowledge the error and make the changes like any ethical researcher would do right? I mean, we all want good outcomes and research based on actual facts and not misrepresentation and out-of-context quotes right?

6. But no... Having received criticism about his behaviour and research from other members of LawTube, Bouzy decides to attack them starting with @GoodLawgic. I mean...calling someone a 40-year-old internet troll living with his parents? What is this, 4Chan?

7. Next stop, he attacks @LumberLaw for calling him out for the way he was acting over a simple error in his report, citing traffic tickets and possibly untrue allegations in an attempt to cast members of LawTube in an bad light.

8. In the meantime, the saavy twitter user constantly hides replies and goes on block sprees on comments that call him out for his behaviour (even from his own fans and followers sometimes). You can find all these hidden replies at the bottom right corner of every post he's made

9. With a lack of the type of response he's looking for, Bouzy then gets even more personal by attacking @NatetheLawyer with the now-deleted tweet after that riles Nate up.

10. He continues attacking him in the hopes of being responded to, and even begs to be included in live streams (so maybe he can taunt on video to try and get a rise? 🤷‍♂️)

11. He keeps taunting and even questions Nate's profession.

12. After all this, he turns around and plays the victim. Maybe taking a cue from Bot Sentinel's former (current?) employer 🤷‍♂️

13. Reporting Nate after finally getting a rise out of someone in the LawTube family and then gloats about it, ATTEMPTING to show with one set up example, that his product works (*cough* it doesn't, just type in the spiciest person you can think of and compare it)

14. Isn't dragging a person through the mud for profit what Mr Bouzy espouses to be against and what his product is supposed to be against? Let me leave his own quote for you to decide who's the actual bully here.
#hypocrisy #hypocrisyhottake

All this just to further an agenda to get more social media coverage and hawk a badly working product, and all because a report had errors from lazy research methods. There is scum and then there is SCUM.

@LumberLaw well this is interesting...it seems that he has deleted this post (it was still up 3-4 hours ago as of this reply). Wonder what he has to hide...