As this question returns now and then, here a short thread on the story behind these fantastic photos.
Yes, they did have motorised scooters over a century ago, lots of them, they were kind of a craze, well, among those who could afford them of course.
🧵with many cool pics:
The motorized scooters first appeared around 1914, generally known as the autoped or motoped.
They had a little engine and could reach speeds of up to 35 miles per hour but that was just for the daredevils.
Some also worked on batteries.
So let's deal with the most famous photo that's shared the most often on social media, is it real?
Yes, it is.
It is Lady Priscilla Norman, she was quite a woman, read more about her here; en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Priscilla…
And if you don't believe me, here's her great-granddaughter confirming it;
Here's one of the earlier mentions of the new vehicle;
Mexico Ledger Mexico, Missouri
27 Oct 1914. newspapers.com/clip/109815491…
Some people claim Lady Norman's autoped was "the first e-scooter" but she probably wasn't the first to own one and hers was not electric.
Yes it does have a battery but that's for the lights, mind you, fully electric ones were made not much later!
So now we've dealt with the story that goes around, let's look at a whole bunch of great old pictures of scooters!
And here she is giving us a demonstration on film!
So, conclusion;
-No, Lady Norman did not drive the FIRST e-bike.
-Yes there were both petrol & electric mopeds/autopeds/motopeds in the early 20th century.
-Yes somehow as a kid I ended up with a stupid wooden one that was only powered by my foot.
SO UNFAIR.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
As I'm annoyed and there's nobody to fight nearby, I'll go debunk a youtube video in stead.
Such fun!
This account has over 4 million subscribers and boy does the thumbnail look promising...
I'm doing this review with rolled up sleeves and wearing knuckledusters.
The description gives us a little hope but... no sources, no references, nothing.
Please tell your children (or let them tell you if you're as old as I am) not blindly believe any video without sources.
Also, what on earth is this lark?
An ai summery?
Youtube stop making everything worse.
Let's review another painting together, another one by Pieter Bruegel the Elder, this time the 'Boerenbruiloft' (farmer's or peasant's wedding) from c. 1567.
Another glimpse of what life was like for common people in the 17th century!
Time to check out some details.
The bride, she looks suspiciously content.
Is she drunk, tired, super content or does she have a secret?
Above her the double paper crown as well as a sort of crown on her head, making her the queen of the event.
It may symbolise her virginity or wealth.
Its in many paintings.
Maybe she's just happy because she lives in the low countries, a place where women got education, divorce, equal inheritance and freedoms & rights that were uncommon elsewhere then!
More about that here; fakehistoryhunter.net/2025/08/04/boo…
Oh boys and girls, auntie Jo has found another real estate gem... and it only costs 4 million Euros...
This may be one of the most gorgeous houses I´ve ever seen.
A Dutch 1917 villa: funda.nl/detail/koop/wa…
Still many of the gorgeous original details, showing us that the house was once full of colour.
We'll have to strip a LOT of boring white paint, I reckon this building originally just had a lot of nice dark polished wood.
Found another gem on the Dutch real estate website.
A lovely little church in the 'Amsterdamse School' style, built in 1926 and clearly inhabited by a fellow time traveller, just wait till you see inside. funda.nl/detail/koop/mu…
Decorated with respect to the design and character of the building but filled with lots of interesting and weird old stuff.
Yep.
Time traveller.