As this question returns now and then, here a short thread on the story behind these fantastic photos.
Yes, they did have motorised scooters over a century ago, lots of them, they were kind of a craze, well, among those who could afford them of course.
🧵with many cool pics:
The motorized scooters first appeared around 1914, generally known as the autoped or motoped.
They had a little engine and could reach speeds of up to 35 miles per hour but that was just for the daredevils.
Some also worked on batteries.
So let's deal with the most famous photo that's shared the most often on social media, is it real?
Yes, it is.
It is Lady Priscilla Norman, she was quite a woman, read more about her here; en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Priscilla…
And if you don't believe me, here's her great-granddaughter confirming it;
Here's one of the earlier mentions of the new vehicle;
Mexico Ledger Mexico, Missouri
27 Oct 1914. newspapers.com/clip/109815491…
Some people claim Lady Norman's autoped was "the first e-scooter" but she probably wasn't the first to own one and hers was not electric.
Yes it does have a battery but that's for the lights, mind you, fully electric ones were made not much later!
So now we've dealt with the story that goes around, let's look at a whole bunch of great old pictures of scooters!
And here she is giving us a demonstration on film!
So, conclusion;
-No, Lady Norman did not drive the FIRST e-bike.
-Yes there were both petrol & electric mopeds/autopeds/motopeds in the early 20th century.
-Yes somehow as a kid I ended up with a stupid wooden one that was only powered by my foot.
SO UNFAIR.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Found another gem on the Dutch real estate website.
A lovely little church in the 'Amsterdamse School' style, built in 1926 and clearly inhabited by a fellow time traveller, just wait till you see inside. funda.nl/detail/koop/mu…
Decorated with respect to the design and character of the building but filled with lots of interesting and weird old stuff.
Yep.
Time traveller.
Sailors of HMS Rattlesnake bathing, drawing made by their captain Owen Stanley in the late 1840s while under orders to survey the inner route along the Great Barrier Reef and to chart the southern coast of New Guinea.
He made many drawings, a few in this thread:
This is how conspiracies are born.
Someone who doesn't understand old art (and may have problems seeing) thinks that this painting shows that Queen Mary I was brown and the painting later (literally) whitewashed to hide that but they forgot one hand... tiktok.com/@kingsmonologu…
Thinking that for a second is fine, but actually believing it and making a whole CSI video about it... that's daft.
Here's the biggest version of the painting I could find.
If we take a closer look at her brown hand...
We see that she's just wearing & holding a folded glove.
Claiming that famous historical figures, especially royals, were not the skin colour everybody thinks they had is quite popular online.
It's weird.
Nice to see an online paper that reaches so many people talk about this subject.
But seeing healthy people during the Black Death would have been very normal.
Not everyone looked sick right away or at the same time.
A thread.
I think this person describes these kind of ai videos very accurately, brilliant, what a wonderful insight, who is this wonderful lady, oh wait, hang on.
Sigh, the "It's not a documentary" excuse is so tiresome.
It's just a slightly less silly sounding way of saying "I couldn't bother to do research", "I don't really care about history" or "Ai do bleep bloop beep boop and its cool and I make money so yay".