Its #ClimateWeekNYC, so its climate🧵week

Yesterday I wrote one⬇️on how the Biden admin can work w/ state & local govts to go further, faster on climate (also lol I called it the Investment Reduction Act)

Today: 3⃣ exciting "force multipliers" in the IRA
Ok so first of all, there are a lot of really great climate investments in the IRA. There's also some bad stuff. But it is really hard to choose the most exciting provisions, imo. These transformational $$ will help build a just and thriving clean energy economy.
Amongst the tax provisions, the clean power tax credits with direct pay for non-profit entities, and the clean manufacturing tax credits, are two of my favorites.

And then, at DOE there is the new $6 billion Advanced Industrial Facilities Deployment Program, and there’s the…
the enormous new financing capabilities @ the DOE Loan Programs Office.🤯DOE LPO was one of the first programs I worked on when I came to DC as a wee lad.

(Btw if @JigarShahDC saw me writing about "force multipliers" in the IRA w/out talking about LPO there'd be hell to pay.)
However, here I want to zero in on 3 programs at the @EPA. Because each will deliver meaningful climate progress on their own while empowering states, communities & companies to leverage much more public and private sector $$ to drive even greater impact.
Also, these are major new investment programs–in clean energy, environmental justice, and other climate solutions–that will be led by the EPA, which is an agency more accustomed to regulating pollution than building clean energy. Exciting stuff.
These 3 "force multipliers” for climate action are:
1⃣ State Climate Pollution Reduction Grants
2⃣ Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund
3⃣ Environmental & Climate Justice Block Grants

Lets dive in...
State Climate Pollution Reduction Grants (IRA Sec. 60114)
This is a new $5 billion program available to states, local clean air agencies, tribal nations and cities, to plan and implement programs, policies and projects that reduce climate pollution.
As I mentioned yesterday, states (+ local govts and tribes) have long been building a road map for nation-wide climate leadership. And this program–a realized version of President Biden’s proposed “Clean Energy Challenge Grants”–could empower some to go further, faster.
Specifically, these Climate Pollution Reduction Grants should be used to lock in new policies (real *requirements*) in a select number of states (and localities, tribes) to drive a faster transition towards 100% clean energy–e.g. in clean power, transportation, buildings.
Next up!
Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund (Sec. 60103)
Call it the GGRF! No call it a Clean Energy Accelerator! No call it a Green Bank! Its all of these things and its very exciting.

But lets unpack this one because even some of its most ardent enthusiasts are a little confused
The GGRF is 1 program that Congress intended as 2 different programs and that for parliamentary reasons is written in the bill as 3 sections. With me so far? Good.
The GGRF is funded at $27 billion
- $7B for state, local and tribal clean energy programs targeting disadvantaged communities–esp. w/ rooftop solar
- $20B for a Clean Energy Accelerator, with no less than 40% ($8B) to support projects in disadvantaged comms, in line w/ Justice40
The Clean Energy Accelerator is based on the proven model of state & local green banks. Beginning in CT in 2011, 23 state and local green banks have been created in 17 states across the US. @CGreenCapital @AGBConsortium
greenbankconsortium.org
These programs take an initial capitalization and turn it into a self-sustaining program financing clean energy deployment. Every $1 invested leveraging much greater private sector funding, and often extending investment into hard-to-reach market segments.
canarymedia.com/articles/clima…
Fun fact: My old boss, @GovInslee, sponsored the first legislation passed by either chamber of Congress to establish a national Green Bank (an amdt to Waxman-Markey in 2009, co-sponsored by Reps. John Dingell and Bart Gordon).

Took only 13 years for the project to be completed.
And particularly exciting about the GGRF is that both its component programs can be used to build an ecosystem of state, local and national clean energy finance–especially targeting disadvantaged communities–throughout the country.
Ok. Phew. Are you still with me? Yes you. Come back here. We have one more of these force multipliers to discuss. (While we sit at this Drs office waiting to get our blood work done.)
Environmental & Climate Justice Block Grants (Sec. 60201)
This EPA program, funded at $3B, is designed to build capacity and climate solutions in disadvantaged communities. A shout out to leaders at @a_justclimate who worked hard to develop this policy alongside Congress.
Part of building an equitable clean energy economy is ensuring all communities can realize the climate solutions they want for themselves. EPA already has a program designed to support this. But the Small EJ Grants Prgm is capped at a paltry $30k/grant. A new model was needed.
So, EJ advocates, and members + staff in Congress, designed the ECJBG program, to directly fund communities to develop and execute plans for pollution reductions, deployment of clean technologies, and mitigation and resilience against climate and environmental health impacts.
These grants will provide low-income and BIPOC communities with resources they can use to leverage other public and private sector investments in sustainable+equitable economic development. Grants can support community involvement in federal, state & local policy processes, too.
At @EvergreenAction we proposed a similar program, in our Evergreen Action Plan, based on CA’s Transformative Climate Communities program. We believe TCC could serve as a useful model as the EPA sets out implementing these critical investments. @CalSGC sgc.ca.gov/programs/tcc/
In conclusion, these are just 3 of the most exciting climate investments in the Inflation Reduction Act. We at @EvergreenAction think each will help ensure more clean, affordable & reliable energy reaches all communities—cutting pollution, creating jobs, addressing climate change
Each will be a force multiplier that will leverage greater private & public sector funding for transformative change.

There’s so much more in the IRA. And much to be done to ensure this $ reaches communities, deliver projects in an efficient, effective & equitable way. Onward.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Sam Ricketts🌲

Sam Ricketts🌲 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SamTRicketts

Sep 19
Now that Congress has passed the transformational Investment Reduction Act, the next chapter in US climate policy will revolve around 3 key areas: IRA implementation (IIJA, too), President Biden's use of executive action, and state action.

Lets talk about how these relate.🧵
More specifically, lets talk about how the first 2 relate to the 3rd—how the Biden Administration can use implementation+exec action to support climate progress at the state (and local and tribal) level.

First, a quick reminder that states are the OG climate leaders in the US...
From renewable energy incentives and vehicle standards, to green banks and 100% clean laws, to lawsuits forcing federal agencies to regulate carbon pollution: states have laid the roadmap for climate leadership.
americanprogress.org/article/states…
Read 16 tweets
Jun 27
The Supreme Court is expected to announce its decision on the West Virginia v EPA case on Monday morning.

This case is bonkers–SCOTUS is ruling on a legal challenge against a Clean Air Act regulation that *does not exist.*

A🧵of sorts. Both historical and personal. Bear with.
So, the Clean Air Act has been around for over 50 years. Congress passed it in 1970. Nixon signed it. Thus began decades of bipartisan support for federal regulation of air pollution. George HW Bush signed a major reauthorization in 1990. This was baseball and apple pie stuff.
And the law has been *incredibly* successful. Reducing all sorts of deadly pollutants. Saving millions of lives. And compelling technological innovation and cleaner industries. The benefits of the act have outweighed any costs to business by over 30-1.
nrdc.org/resources/clea…
Read 27 tweets
Oct 20, 2021
The bottom line now is that Manchin's opposition to the CEPP cannot take down with it $150 billion in investments in our clean energy future. Those investments are too important, especially for driving the power sector transformation that we need and to which Biden has committed.
There are so many critical climate investments in the Build Back Better Act —from clean energy tax credits, a Clean Energy Accelerator, EJ Block Grants, building electrification rebates, and more. It has hurt to lose CEPP, but there's so much more that we must win. Onward.
Btw re CEPP

They called it too ambitious when we proposed a 100% by 2035 Clean Electricity Standard (CES). Then Biden embraced it.

They said a CES couldnt work in budget reconciliation. We showed it could, effectively, with CEPP.

Manchin was the final big boss we couldn’t beat
Read 4 tweets
Sep 15, 2021
🚨5 Things to Know About the Clean Electricity Performance Program (CEPP)🔌⚡️

1. Its going to grow the workforce by 8 million jobs and create $1 trillion in economic growth over the coming decade, according to new independent economic analysis.
evergreenaction.com/policy-hub/The…
2. CEPP will drive an affordable, cost-effective clean energy transition–using federal investments to drive the transition and ensuring costs are not borne by customers. Utilities must use 100% of their grant money for customer benefit. energycommerce.house.gov/sites/democrat…
3. CEPP builds upon—but demands more than—utilities’ existing clean energy commitments and state policies. One meta-analysis of power sector modeling conducted shows that CEPP’s clean electricity goals are achievable and will maintain grid reliability. energyinnovation.org/wp-content/upl…
Read 5 tweets
Dec 31, 2019
This 10yo article really hurts to read.

At the outset of the 2010s I was a 24yo congressional staffer watching hope and hard work fade to black as the US Senate killed the House’s climate bill - our nation’s first-ever real shot at comprehensive climate legislation. /1
Then the GOP took the House- and gobs of govs’ seats- in 2010, in the most cynical, utterly amoral and undeserved electoral victory. They gerrymandered themselves a permanent majority, and any hope for federal climate policy was dead for a decade. /2
It’s work remembering just how clear the new GOP majority made that, since many forget: the very first goddamn thing they did was try to strip the EPA’s ability to regulate greenhouse gas pollution under the Clean Air Act. It was their first major bill, in Feb 2011. /3
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(