🧵RISING INTEREST RATES ARE A BIGGER DEAL THAN YOU MIGHT THINK🧵
This is important (hence the caps).
I’m a bit worried people are being WAY too complacent about rising interest rates.
They assume that because they’re so low now vs the 1990s, this’ll be a walk in the park.
NO.
Let’s start with this chart. Outlook for interest rates has changed enormously in the past few months. Back at the start of the year they weren’t expected to get much above 1.5%.
By Aug they were expected to peak at 2.75%.
Now the expected peak is 4.75%.
BIG shift in a short time
Now the conventional wisdom about this is that while a rise in rates might be tough for some households, it’ll be nothing like what we experienced in the ‘70s, ‘80s or ‘90s.
After all, rates back then were in double digits.
Look at this chart:
In other words, the implication is that anyone who gets worried about 4.75% interest rates is an utter snowflake.
“When I were a lad interest rates were 15%” etc etc.
Right. But here’s the thing: interest rates are only one (quite misleading) part of the picture…
Because what’s really relevant here is how AFFORDABLE those interest rates are for mortgage holders.
What matters is not just the RATE but how much you’re borrowing and (equally important) how high your disposable income is vs those payments.
Add all those things to the equation - debt burdens, incomes, mortgage terms and mortgage rates - you end up with a very different picture.
Here’s data from @resi_analyst who’s worked out the “equivalent” interest rate - eg the actual BURDEN of interest rates over time.
So for instance, take 1980. Back then, official BoE interest rates were on average 14.2%.
But because people were much less heavily indebted, because their incomes were much higher vs their repayments, that was, in affordability terms, EQUIVALENT to 3% in today’s interest rates.
Look solely at those “equivalent” interest rates, adjusted for affordability.
V different picture, right?
Actually interest rates aren’t way lower than in the 1970s - they’re v similar.
An increase to 4.75% would take us up to levels similar to just before the financial crisis.
If rates went up to 6% (not currently forecast but these days who knows?!) it would be horrendous.
The mortgage burden would be very similar to the early 1990s - which precipitated the worst housing crash in modern history.
Prob even worse cos this data doesn’t adjust for MIRAS.
This is not a super complex lesson. It’s widely understood among housing specialists.
But I don’t think it’s fully appreciated in Westminster.
This matters because the impact of writing blank cheques and borrowing many billions is to put pressure on BoE to raise rates.
If you take interest rates at face value it’s easy to assume 4% is still a comparatively low level.
It’s easy to assume we can probably stomach 6% without too much pain, like we did in the early 2000s. It’s “nothing” compared to the 1980s.
But this is the wrong lesson.
More on this here. It’s a big deal.
The interest rates we’re currently heading for will be considerably more painful than the headline numbers might suggest.
NB not every household has a mortgage. But those who do may be in for a shock when they refix. news.sky.com/story/interest…
Traders are now pricing in UK interest rates to rise above 5.75%. This would be very VERY painful. More on why in this thread 👆
Blimey. Investors are now better on UK interest rates topping 6 per cent by the first half of next year. You can see the expectations rising literally by the minute…
Ugh. The number of households due to re-fix their mortgages will peak at the very moment when, if market curves are to be believed, BoE interest rates will rise to 6% or possibly beyond.
I know I keep repeating this but still: this is a very big deal.
Back when I began this thread (only last Thurs which already feels like a world away) 6% interest rates next yr seemed slightly far-fetched.
And no bad thing, because 6% would be hideously painful for many families (see 👆).
Today traders were betting on 6% rates next year.
Look:
NEW:
Moneyfacts says:
- avg 2yr fixed rate mortgage is now up to 6.07% (was 2.25% a year ago)
- avg 5yr rate up to 5.97% (was 2.55% a year ago)
Highest mortgage rates since 2008.
But that’s understating how painful these rates will feel for people (for all the reasons above👆)
Let’s put this into perspective.
This chart shows you the avg monthly cost of repaying a mortgages (as a % of income)
With mortgage rates at 6%, they go up from 18% to 27%.
Highest mortgage burden since 1989.
This is not a projection: for those fixing mortgages now it’s a reality
Worth saying: this is not a “new” concern that’s cropped up after the mini Budget.
Many in the housing industry (inc @resi_analyst who did lots of the sums for the charts above) have been warning about the disproportionate impact of even slightly higher rates for a long time.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
If you're interested in energy/climate you've probably heard the nugget that "kerosene/crude oil helped save the whales", by reducing demand for whale oil in lanterns.
I've even trotted it out myself🤦♂️
But there's a problem with it. A BIG problem...
🧵
The backstory here begins 200 years ago, before the age of crude oil & electricity, when the best way to light a room was a lantern, and the best oil to burn in that lantern was oil from a sperm whale.
It burnt brighter and with less smoke or stink than other oils
The oil itself is found in the head of the sperm whale. It comes from a totally unique organ whose function remains a matter of debate - the spermaceti organ.
Whale oil is a long chain molecule unlike nearly anything else in the natural world, giving it unique qualities
If you're even half interested in energy, I bet you've seen this chart. I call it The Most Hopeful Chart in the World.
The point? We're embracing renewable power MUCH faster than expected.
Hurrah!
Only problem is, this chart has an evil twin. A chart we really need to discuss
🧵
The Most Hopeful Chart in the World shows how each year the @IEA predicted that the amount of solar output around the world would plateau or rise v slowly in the following years. But instead solar output defied all expectations, rising exponentially.
That's great news.
But making solar panels is an energy-intensive exercise.
You need a lot of coal to smelt down the silicon and a lot of power to turn metallurgical silicon into polysilicon, let alone the monocrystalline boules you really need for a decent solar module (read my book for more 📖)
🚜FARMAGEDDON🌾
The story of what's REALLY going on in farming. A story far more complex than the conventional wisdom.
This isn't just (or even mainly) about inheritance tax. It's about a cascade of challenges & crises that may ultimately threaten food security.
📽️5 min primer👇
Let's begin with that big, overarching issue: food security.
For most of the past century, farmers have been encouraged to grow as much food as possible. The story here goes back to WWII and its aftermath, when the conventional wisdom was the UK needed to be more self sufficient
Encouraged by the govt, the UK's domestic food production, which before WWII had dropped to just 35% of what we ate, rose rapidly to over 60%.
Some economists say self sufficiency is overrated. But it's one of those post-war principles that stuck.
By accident as much as design.
🚗What's happening to Europe's car industry is one of the biggest stories in the world right now, & prob the biggest story of next year too.
A slow motion implosion driven by multiple factors (esp Chinese competition).
Watch my primer on what's going on👇
What makes this moment so dangerous, so destructive for legacy carmakers, is that this is a perfect storm. Three main issues: 1. The shift from conventional engines to batteries is a DISRUPTIVE innovation. The kind of thing Clay Christensen wrote about.
This is a MASSIVE deal...
Think about a combustion engine.
An assembly of HUNDREDS of pieces of metal, all perfectly honed to turn fuel into motion.
Making these things is REALLY hard. Which is why:
a) that's where most of the value/jobs are
b) other countries have struggled to compete making them
Today we learnt the no of people flowing into the UK hit an all-time high last yr: an influx we've NEVER seen before either as a total or as a share of the population.
So... why is the @ONS (and some news organisations) reporting this as a FALL in migration?!
Let's dig deeper
🧵
The ONS publishes immigration figures every six months. There's a lot of data, with plenty of provisos all over it.
But as is often the case the story gets simplified in the telling.
Consider the story the last time the data came out. This is how the chart looked 👇
And here's how most people reported the numbers: immigration was going down. Yes, from unprecedented highs - but even so. Down by 10%. A success story, as far as the then govt was concerned.
🧵SALT🧵
It's been snowing in the UK and the road gritters are out in force, begging the question:
Have you ever wondered where that grit actually COMES from?
The answer is more magical, beautiful and fascinating than you probably realised.
1/14
Because that dirty-looking salt being spread by trucks on our roads is actually the remains of an ancient ocean (actually two ancient oceans), buried deep beneath our feet.
Most of the stuff being spread in London comes from a single mine in Cheshire - at Winsford.
2/14
Here, about 20 to 40m beneath the meadows of Cheshire, is an enormous slab of halite, rock salt, the remains of an ancient inland sea a couple of hundred million years ago.
This is where most of our salt comes from.
3/14