Ed Conway Profile picture
Sep 22, 2022 19 tweets 6 min read Read on X
🧵RISING INTEREST RATES ARE A BIGGER DEAL THAN YOU MIGHT THINK🧵
This is important (hence the caps).
I’m a bit worried people are being WAY too complacent about rising interest rates.
They assume that because they’re so low now vs the 1990s, this’ll be a walk in the park.
NO.
Let’s start with this chart. Outlook for interest rates has changed enormously in the past few months. Back at the start of the year they weren’t expected to get much above 1.5%.
By Aug they were expected to peak at 2.75%.
Now the expected peak is 4.75%.
BIG shift in a short time Image
Now the conventional wisdom about this is that while a rise in rates might be tough for some households, it’ll be nothing like what we experienced in the ‘70s, ‘80s or ‘90s.
After all, rates back then were in double digits.
Look at this chart: Image
In other words, the implication is that anyone who gets worried about 4.75% interest rates is an utter snowflake.
“When I were a lad interest rates were 15%” etc etc.
Right. But here’s the thing: interest rates are only one (quite misleading) part of the picture…
Because what’s really relevant here is how AFFORDABLE those interest rates are for mortgage holders.
What matters is not just the RATE but how much you’re borrowing and (equally important) how high your disposable income is vs those payments.
Add all those things to the equation - debt burdens, incomes, mortgage terms and mortgage rates - you end up with a very different picture.
Here’s data from @resi_analyst who’s worked out the “equivalent” interest rate - eg the actual BURDEN of interest rates over time. Image
So for instance, take 1980. Back then, official BoE interest rates were on average 14.2%.
But because people were much less heavily indebted, because their incomes were much higher vs their repayments, that was, in affordability terms, EQUIVALENT to 3% in today’s interest rates. Image
Look solely at those “equivalent” interest rates, adjusted for affordability.
V different picture, right?
Actually interest rates aren’t way lower than in the 1970s - they’re v similar.
An increase to 4.75% would take us up to levels similar to just before the financial crisis. Image
If rates went up to 6% (not currently forecast but these days who knows?!) it would be horrendous.
The mortgage burden would be very similar to the early 1990s - which precipitated the worst housing crash in modern history.
Prob even worse cos this data doesn’t adjust for MIRAS. Image
This is not a super complex lesson. It’s widely understood among housing specialists.
But I don’t think it’s fully appreciated in Westminster.
This matters because the impact of writing blank cheques and borrowing many billions is to put pressure on BoE to raise rates.
If you take interest rates at face value it’s easy to assume 4% is still a comparatively low level.
It’s easy to assume we can probably stomach 6% without too much pain, like we did in the early 2000s. It’s “nothing” compared to the 1980s.
But this is the wrong lesson.
More on this here. It’s a big deal.
The interest rates we’re currently heading for will be considerably more painful than the headline numbers might suggest.
NB not every household has a mortgage. But those who do may be in for a shock when they refix. news.sky.com/story/interest…
Traders are now pricing in UK interest rates to rise above 5.75%. This would be very VERY painful. More on why in this thread 👆 Image
Blimey. Investors are now better on UK interest rates topping 6 per cent by the first half of next year. You can see the expectations rising literally by the minute… Image
Ugh. The number of households due to re-fix their mortgages will peak at the very moment when, if market curves are to be believed, BoE interest rates will rise to 6% or possibly beyond.
I know I keep repeating this but still: this is a very big deal.
Back when I began this thread (only last Thurs which already feels like a world away) 6% interest rates next yr seemed slightly far-fetched.
And no bad thing, because 6% would be hideously painful for many families (see 👆).
Today traders were betting on 6% rates next year.
Look: Image
NEW:
Moneyfacts says:
- avg 2yr fixed rate mortgage is now up to 6.07% (was 2.25% a year ago)
- avg 5yr rate up to 5.97% (was 2.55% a year ago)
Highest mortgage rates since 2008.
But that’s understating how painful these rates will feel for people (for all the reasons above👆)
Let’s put this into perspective.
This chart shows you the avg monthly cost of repaying a mortgages (as a % of income)
With mortgage rates at 6%, they go up from 18% to 27%.
Highest mortgage burden since 1989.
This is not a projection: for those fixing mortgages now it’s a reality Image
Worth saying: this is not a “new” concern that’s cropped up after the mini Budget.
Many in the housing industry (inc @resi_analyst who did lots of the sums for the charts above) have been warning about the disproportionate impact of even slightly higher rates for a long time.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ed Conway

Ed Conway Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @EdConwaySky

Feb 24
🧵Three years ago, when Russia invaded Ukraine, EU, UK and other nations vowed to wage economic war, via the toughest sanctions in history.
So... how's that going?
We've spent months documenting what ACTUALLY happened. Here's a thread of threads on the REAL story on sanctions...
1. Flows of dual use items, including radar parts, drone components and other parts used by Russia to kill Ukrainians, carried on from the UK and Europe to Russia, via the backdoor (eg the Caucasus & Central Asia)
2. Of all the goods sent by the UK to Russian neighbours, few were as significant as luxury cars.
Having sanctioned Russia (the idea being to starve Putin's cronies of luxuries) Britain (and Europe more widely) began sending those sanctioned cars in via the backdoor instead
Read 9 tweets
Feb 16
If the main thing the US really wants out of a deal with Ukraine is "50% of its rare earth minerals" then I'm surprised this can't be wrapped up pretty quickly.
Why? Because Ukraine doesn't HAVE many rare earth resources.
Really. As far as anyone knows it's got barely any... Image
Yes, Ukraine has lots of coal and iron and manganese.
It also has some potential sizeable reserves of stuff like titanium, graphite and lithium. Not to mention some promising shale gas.
But of the 109 deposits identified by KSE only 3 are rare earth elements Image
Now in one respect I'm making a pedantic point: a lot of people say "rare earth elements" when they actually mean "critical minerals".
The two aren't the same thing.
Rare earth elements are a v specific bit of the periodic table: actually they're NOT all that rare.
More on them👇
Read 7 tweets
Jan 17
🧵THE STRANGE CASE OF THE ONE MILLION POUND FINE
The story of an obscure press release on an obscure website which begs intriguing questions about Britain's "unprecedentedly tough" sanctions regime & why perhaps it's not quite as tough as it looks.
You may find it unsettling
👇
Back in Aug 2023, HMRC published this notice in the bowels of its website. Don't worry if it doesn't ring a bell - it didn't get any publicity.
But it's a big deal. A £1m fine for breaking Russian sanctions rules.
The single biggest fine in relation to trade sanctions. Image
But there are some gaping questions about this fine.
First: who paid it? Is this a firm we've heard of? Second: what did they actually do wrong? And what did they do to deserve to pay such a large sum?
There are no answers on the website. That's it. Here's why this matters. Image
Read 17 tweets
Jan 10
🇨🇳I was rather hoping to be writing this from China, where the Chancellor has just landed for the most significant economic mission in ages - restarting Britain's formal economic relationship with China.
Alas I'm still in London.
But make no mistake; this visit is a BIG deal.
🧵
Why?
Because this is the first such trip since 2017.
UK econ relations with China have been getting frostier for 6 yrs or more.
Huawei have been thrown out; rules imposed on Chinese businesspeople; accusations of spying.
& around the world nations are imposing tariffs on China.
But the UK is doing something different.
While nearly every other G7 nation has imposed tariffs on Chinese electric cars, the UK hasn't. While most countries are going colder on China (most notably the US), the UK is now cosying up to China. Why?
Read 19 tweets
Jan 7
🔥GAS PRICES🔥
Why are they on the rise again?
Why is Europe (and the UK) deindustrialising at a rapid pace?
Why have we failed (contrary to the conventional wisdom) to increase the amount of non-Russian gas in our system?
Lots of questions. Some answers in my five min primer 👇
This is a big deal - and not widely understood:
The volume of non-Russian gas in the European system is FLAT vs before the Ukraine war.
That's not the conventional wisdom.
Back in 2022 many assumed imported LNG would help make up the lost gas from Russia.
That didn't happen... Image
Instead what happened is subtly, but importantly, different.
Yes, the amount of LNG coming in from the US rose quite sharply - albeit from a low base.
But that rise was only enough to compensate for the fact that domestic production in the UK/EU was FALLING at the same time Image
Read 13 tweets
Jan 5
🌾 VERTICAL FARMING🌾
Could it save the world?
I used to be sceptical. There are MANY challenges.
But then I visited one. & I'm no longer so sure.
So with the world facing future food crises here's a thread on the most interesting thing to happen to farming in a long time...
🧵 Image
Let's start with a chart.
A few weeks ago I did a deep data dive into the state of farming in the UK.
It culminated with a v long-run chart suggesting our ability to grow ever more crops in a given hectare is slowing. Possibly stalling.
This is a really big deal
What if we could send the line in that chart 👇into the stratosphere?
It would have massive consequences. We'd be able to get ever more food from a relatively small section of land. Meaning more land for housing/rewilding or whatever else we'd want to use it for. But how? Image
Read 22 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(