A Trump-era program meant to crackdown on Chinese economic espionage morphed into targeting academics of Chinese descent. Now as the US seeks to defend its global scientific leadership, a growing number of those academics are leaving the US. wsj.com/articles/u-s-c…
New data from researchers at Princeton, Harvard & MIT paints an astounding picture: 1,400+ U.S.-trained Chinese scientists switched from U.S. to Chinese affiliations in 2021, a 22% jump from the previous year. This coincides with when the DOJ began targeting more academics.
Many were tenured professors and giants in their field, including a winner of the Fields Medal, the highest honor in mathematics.
Many were also in strategically important fields like aerospace & biology.
To understand the impact that this could have on US competitiveness and national security, consider the story of renowned scientist Qian Xuesen who, after being forced out the US during the McCarthy era, went on to help build China’s space and nuclear-weapons program.
As @AlexNowrasteh at the Cato institute put it to us: “How is sending the next generation of Qian Xuesens back to China good for U.S. national defense or U.S. innovation?”
The vast majority of these scientists want to stay and to contribute to the U.S. An @AASForumOrg survey among US-based Chinese scientists found that 89% wanted to contribute to U.S. scientific and technological leadership. But many now feel this increasingly untenable.
.@shashamimi & I spoke to nearly 20 ethnically Chinese scientists who have left or are contemplating leaving. They cited fears of U.S. government surveillance & anti-Asian violence. They spoke about the pull of China's growing scientific prowess & a desire to be close to family.
They were clear-eyed about the academic restrictions they would face in China but felt that for them, the US was becoming no different. “It’s really a dilemma,” One Berkeley PhD student said. “You can’t go to China for many reasons. You can’t stay in the U.S. happily.”
This is particularly concerning given how much scientists & engineers of Chinese descent have contributed to US innovation. Consider AI, a strategically important field. In 2020, 27% of US-based AI researchers were from China, 31% from the US, per @MacroPoloChina.
.@ericschmidt put this in context for us: The number of US-born AI PhD students hasn't increased since 1990. Thus immigration is crucial for the US's continued AI leadership. Chinese & other foreign-born scientists "are a source of national strength," he said.
Meanwhile, China-based scholars overtook U.S.-based scholars in 2019 in producing the largest share of the top 1% most highly cited scientific papers. link.springer.com/article/10.100…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Governments around the world are grappling with how to stamp out misinfo & toxicity on the internet. China is first to advance its solution: an unprecedented plan to control platforms' underlying algorithms.
Earlier this month, China's top internet regulator announced that two dozen of the country's most influential internet companies had submitted a total of 30 of their core recommendation algorithms.
These included Bytedance's personalization algorithm for Douyin (the Chinese version of TikTok), Baidu's search-ranking algorithm, and Alibaba's Tmall product-recommendation algorithm. The full list is translated here. chinalawtranslate.com/en/algorith-li…
For more than a decade, China was the top source of international students to the US; the US was the top choice for studying abroad from China. Now that's changed amid sky-high US-China tensions, gun violence & anti-Asian racism. And that's bad for the US. wsj.com/articles/chine…
In the first half of 2022, the number of U.S. student visas issued to Chinese nationals plunged by *more than 50%* compared with pre-Covid levels. @shashamimi, @melissakorn and I dug into data and spoke with students and universities to better understand this dramatic trend.
Chinese students have had to navigate a lot of Covid-related travel restrictions, yes. But they also cited concerns for their safety and a feeling of being unwelcome in the US.
I had the pleasure of listening to Josh & Liza talk about the process of reporting and writing their book last week. This isn't one to miss. It has something for everyone interested in AI, tech, and China.
This book helped me weave together seemingly disparate threads about the global nature of the AI industry, China's dramatic rise over the last two decades, and the complicated relationship between Beijing and Chinese tech companies.
What struck me most were the commonalities between the Chinese government's pursuit of surveillance & what we see in the US. As in the US, which dramatically expanded surveillance after 9/11, Beijing grew far more aggressive under a premise to crack down on crime & terrorism.
China has built one of the world's strongest data-protection regimes. Yet the recent Shanghai police leak, which exposed nearly 1b citizens' data, shows that something isn't working. One reason is another of the gov's security projects: mass surveillance. wsj.com/articles/china…
While the Shanghai police leak is the most shocking example, it led us to find an entire underground market for the selling of Chinese citizens' data. At least four of the caches we found, which we verified to contain authentic records, were likely stolen from gov databases.
Every country struggles with its digital defenses. The U.S. is also very bad. Compared to China's 700+ terabytes of data exposed on the internet, the US has nearly 540.
The latest mind-bending details of one of history's largest data heists: Experts say the Shanghai police database, which exposed nearly 1b Chinese citizens' info, didn't just lack a password—it was using such outdated software, no password could be added. wsj.com/articles/aliba…
Experts say the database, hosted on Alibaba Cloud, also suffered several other security problems—part of a pattern that matched 13 more databases hosted by the company.
Authorities have now called in Alibaba executives and an internal investigation is undergoing, employees say.
What does it mean no password could be added? The database that Alibaba deployed was an Elasticsearch database, version 5.x. This version of the product didn't include any basic security features, including password protection, without a security add-on that was never installed.
The Shanghai police data heist grows more insane: Experts say the database of nearly 1b Chinese citizens was not hacked—it simply had no password, allowing the thief to waltz in, wipe the data & leave a ransom note: "contact_for_your_data…recovery10btc." wsj.com/articles/china…
I spoke to two cybersecurity experts @vinnytroia & @MayhemDayOne who both run cybersecurity services that regularly scan the web for unsecured databases. They each discovered this database at different points earlier this year but didn't immediately realize what it was.
After the recent news about the leak, they went back through their notes and found an exact match to the description of the database that a user on a cybercrime forum is now selling—for the same price tag as the ransom amount: 10BTC.