Watching strong testimony to Canadian Parliament in support of #BillC18 from news industry and former Australian competition commissioner who studied and rolled out very similar law and has seen it work firsthand to balance bargaining power for news press small and large. /1
Rod Sims has since produced a report on the results in Australia which compel Google and Facebook to negotiate with press small and large. This is the bill which FB pulled news from its service and WSJ reported intentionally caused chaos to try to disrupt its evential passing. /2
Very few people have Google and Facebook’s back in trying to stop the Canadian bill. Even less than in Australia. The same people show up spreading misinformation suggesting the bills “tax links” or incentivize “click bait” - this is simply untrue. /3
Sims doesn’t pull punches in suggesting how Google and Facebook have hurt journalism after going through the details of how Australia’s law has created more funding for news orgs, small and large, new and old. /4
Sims has made news several times:
- predicts Facebook will be designated under regs as it hasn’t played ball entirely
- says small pubs who collectively bargained are actually getting paid the *most per journalist* under the law
- also notes native digital pubs love law. /5
Big mic Google Guy is back saying hundreds of small local pubs are “thriving” already and law compelling Google and Facebook to negotiate with news pubs (who elect to participate) will hurt them. I kid you not. He also tried to pass mic to fellow Google supporter but failed. /6
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
playing footsie with tracking cookie deprecation for 3yrs, floating a quasi-spin of its adtech and new transparency. “Behind the scenes, Google is flailing – despite its predictably tight control over industry narratives.”
Me, on Google for @DCNorg: digitalcontentnext.org/blog/2022/09/2…
What if I told you Google required the use of its ad server in order to receive the benefits of Google’s market-leading ad exchange and the fast-growing advertising demand dollars flowing through it? /2
Court: “The States plausibly allege Google used its monopoly power in AdX to actually coerce publishers into licensing a separate and distinct product, G’s DFP ad server, and G’s actions had anticompetitive effects in both markets, affecting a substantial amount of commerce.” /3
US Attorney General Merrick Garland made a remarkably powerful speech over the weekend after swearing in the newest citizens at Ellis Island. Threading it here with the highest recommendation (ten minutes!). I’ll play it for my own kids this evening. 1 of 5
US Attorney General Merrick Garland made a remarkably powerful speech over the weekend after swearing in the newest citizens at Ellis Island. Threading it here with the highest recommendation (ten minutes!). I’ll play it for my own kids this evening. 2 of 5
US Attorney General Merrick Garland made a remarkably powerful speech over the weekend after swearing in the newest citizens at Ellis Island. Threading it here with the highest recommendation (ten minutes!). I’ll play it for my own kids this evening. 3 of 5
Whoa. Incoming unsealed Facebook docs. Today's court hearing on sanctions just resulted in unsealing many redactions around two areas of alleged discovery abuse: First, Facebook's promised ADI "audit" of all apps on their platform which was ordered turned over. Stay with me. /1
First, a super quick reminder on what Facebook and Mark Zuckerberg promised the world in a blog post and then under oath to U.S. Congress, "if we find developers that misused personally identifiable information, we will ban them and tell everyone affected by those apps." /2
This is all important as the public narrative - fueled by Facebook - mostly focused on politics + Cambridge Analytica rather than its underlying platform for leaking (and cutting off) data by design to hack growth. And now subject of privacy, governance and antitrust suits. /3
Facebook sanctions hearing one hour in (audio being streamed live now). First 30min was focused on process. Court made it very clear the problem with allowing discovery abuse by Facebook to be swept under the rug with a massive settlement. Now moved into actual allegations. /1
First area of focus was Facebook’s shenanigans in response to orders to turn over all data they have on the named plaintiffs and not just what’s in the DYI file. Court discussed how FB appears to have a different data set for law enforcement calling it into question. /2
Interesting points made by FB’s lead counsel as she states a cookie is not used in any way as an identifier by Facebook. I need to think about the semantics she chose to use but it will cause a lot of pause. /3
My 3pm cancelled so the upside is I can watch Senate hearing - Facebook’s key executive Chris Cox. Cox was a last minute cancellation for Parliament (and then left the company) in the peak of Facebook’s last round of scandals. Will thread thoughts here. /1
OK, it’s started. Facebook up first. Tough week so far for FB PR considering stock has lost 12% of value, Jedi blue was in the news today, sanctions hearing tomorrow and who knows what else we don’t know about… YouTube up second. /2
A note on YouTube. Its decisions turned Russia Today into its 2nd most popular news brand in its “Preferred” channels. It only went away around press report many months after USG named RT as an agent of Kremlin. Google claimed “the algorithms” removed it. Ask him under oath. /3