In 2019, I did my masterclass2019.co.uk tour. In it, I predicted the changes over the next 3-7 years which would happen to workers' rights as a result of leaving the EU. I have gone back today and rewatched those videos...
1/17
These were my six predictions on what was likely to change in #ukemplaw between 2022 and 2027.
2/17
First, TUPE. I thought TUPE will remain largely unchanged. It’s part of accepted employment protection now, and in some ways the TUPE regs already go further than EU law requires.
3/17
But I predicted some tweaking, eg relaxation of consultation provisions, and probably allowing post-transfer harmonisation of terms and conditions (which we can’t do now because of Daddy’s Dance Hall.)
4/17
Second, our laws on collective consultation for 20+ redundancies stem from Europe. They are unpopular with employers and I predicted they would be be watered down, eg collective consultation only if over, say, 100.
5/17
But this is not a legislative priority, and it would require additional primary legislation and face considerable opposition from unions. It will not be part of the 2023 sunset repeals.
6/17
Third, I said most of the Working Time Regs will remain unchanged. Paid annual leave will stay – we goldplated with 5.6 weeks instead of 4. But I predicted three changes:
7/17
(1) reversing some of the holiday pay cases, eg carrying over holiday pay when sick; including commission and overtime in the calculation of a week’s pay
8/17
(2) the 48 hour maximum working week will go as it is universally unpopular and hardly enforced (so junior doctors can look forward to the return of the 80 hour week)
9/17
(3) the caselaw providing that some on-call and travelling time counts as ‘working time’ will also be reversed
10/17
Fourth, the Agency Worker Regs (implementing the Temporary Agency Workers Directive) require employers to offer equal terms & benefits (such as pay and annual leave) to agency workers once working for 12 weeks.
11/17
I said these were massively unpopular and will probably be repealed by a right wing government – but are not sufficiently widespread to mean it is a priority. Now we are likely to have 'automatic' repeal, I think they will go on 31/12/23.
12/17
Fifth, discrimination. Because of the 2006 EU Equal Treatment Framework Directive we introduced protected characteristics including religion and age. Nobody is arguing removing any of the protected characteristics – they’re here to stay.
13/17
BUT there is a good chance, with a Tory government, that discrimination compensation will be capped (we are currently prevented from capping by EU law), as unfair dismissal compensation is capped. This is not dependent on the 31/12/23 changes and might happen at any time.
14/17
Sixth, some of our family friendly laws stem from the EU, but it is very unlikely there will be any reduction. We exceed EU rights considerably, eg 52 weeks maternity, shared parental leave, and there is little political appetite to attack these.
15/17
As part of virtualemploymentlawacademy.com, I will update and revise these predictions, to explain what workers' rights I think will disappear, and what laws will stay (either in the same, or altered format) after 31 December 2023. Just two weeks left to enrol.
16/17
I hope you've found this thread helpful.
Follow me @daniel_barnett for more, or visit virtualemploymentlawacademy.com and join me to receive a nationally accredited CPD qualification in employment law over the next six months.
Can you imagine a duller title for a government Bill than the Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill?
1/8
But this might just be the most important piece of employment legislation we’ve seen since the introduction of discrimination and dismissal laws in the 1970s. It was published yesterday. publications.parliament.uk/pa/bills/cbill…
2/8
The Bill will automatically repeal any retained EU law (which includes UK statutory instruments introduced to comply with EU law) so that it expires on 31 December 2023 (although this date can be extended until 31/12/2026), unless legislation is introduced to retain it.
3/8
We discuss the various limbs in the definition of harassment in the Equality Act 2010, run through examples, disect the extent of an employer's responsibility for the acts of its workforce, look at how employers should deal with anonymous complaints, and much more.
Centre Parcs is closing next Monday, to the anger of thousands of holidaymakers. Is it legal, and what can you do? My preliminary thoughts by way of THREAD bbc.co.uk/news/business-…
/1
Centre Parcs can only close and require people to leave for the day if their terms and conditions say they can. And they don't. So they can't.
First, section H3 allows them to refuse to 'confirm' any 'reservation'. It's not the clearest language, but what I think that means is that if you book online, they have a window to say 'no, we refuse'.
/3
What should you do if, as an employer, you receive a complaint about cyber bullying or harassment? I recommend you take the following steps:
1. take a comprehensive statement from the complainant without delay
1 of 10
2. work out what acts of misconduct may have been committed by referring to your policies
3. appoint an experienced person to lead the investigation
4. Decide who would be the decision maker if disciplinary action becomes necessary, and who would hear any appeal
2 of 10
5. Outline the process to be followed to the alleged victim and harasser
6. Write a comprehensive letter to the person accused so they are aware of exactly what they are accused of, the process to be followed, and the possible outcomes.
Things can turn really serious, really quickly, if your employee steals or misuses your confidential information or intellectual property.
1 of 22
Cases which predate the 2000s focus on employees making photocopies of their employer’s confidential information such as client lists and commercially sensitive data, and infringing their intellectual property, such as breaching their copyright and registered trademarks.
2 of 22
The same underlying issues arise nowadays, except that information tends to be emailed to personal email accounts, downloaded to memory sticks or uploaded to a file transfer service such as WeTransfer or Dropbox. The intent is the same; only the methods have changed.
A short thread, followed by a video where I explain in more detail.
1/9
You might think that something you say at work is trivial, such as an office joke to a French colleague about a particular nationality being ‘bad losers’ after a big football match; or a moan to another colleague about a female line manager being a “bit shrill” at meetings.
2/9
But should anyone overhearing such comments find them offensive – not just the person to whom the comment is directed, but anyone – then your remarks could be construed as unwanted conduct.
3/9