What is the One China Policy, and why does π¨π³ always like to bring it up?
A thread: π§΅
A thread: π§΅
You know how when someone feels really insecure about something, so they keep talking about it, repeating it, trying to reinforce it into people's minds so they feel more secure about it? That's what that is.
How do we know it's like that?
How do we know it's like that?
Have you ever heard of a One USA policy? Or a One Canada policy? No, because nobody needs to be told that there is only One USA, and One Canada.
It'd be like if I was insecure about the size of my yellow penis.
It'd be like if I was insecure about the size of my yellow penis.
But I was that annoying, rude, disrespectful, and juvenile rich kid we all knew in class that everyone wanted to be "friends" with simply to enjoy and benefit from their riches.
But again, I was insecure about the size of my yellow penis. So what do I do?
But again, I was insecure about the size of my yellow penis. So what do I do?
I say, "If you want to be friends (aka have official diplomatic relations) with me, you have to sign on the dotted line that I have the biggest penis on Earth, (that our China, the PRC, π¨π³, is the "One" and only China on Earth.)
But if I did in fact have the biggest penis on Earth, would I need to do that in the first place?
No.
People would just know.
It's why the USA doesn't feel the need to enforce a One USA policy, because everybody knows there's actually only one USA.
No.
People would just know.
It's why the USA doesn't feel the need to enforce a One USA policy, because everybody knows there's actually only one USA.
It's *precisely because* there are in fact Two Chinas, the ROC πΉπΌ, and the PRC π¨π³, that they feel compelled to try to use all the leverage they have to create a piece of fiction that they can manipulate and enforce into a "reality" that they enjoy. 
The solution?
The truth is, there could be a peace treaty TODAY.
The problem is, ONLY ONE SIDE, one of the "Chinas" isn't interested in peace, and what's worse, ONLY ONE SIDE is threatening the other, and wants to annex the other, either through violence, or coercion.
The truth is, there could be a peace treaty TODAY.
The problem is, ONLY ONE SIDE, one of the "Chinas" isn't interested in peace, and what's worse, ONLY ONE SIDE is threatening the other, and wants to annex the other, either through violence, or coercion.
It's not a mystery why the Taiwanese don't want to be invaded and/or annexed by the PRC π¨π³ .
https://twitter.com/danzwku/status/1553804642508648448?s=20&t=AMC7fDi2S4ITPcZ0Uhyyjg
The Peace Treaty could essentially say, the PRC π¨π³ gets the land that they got from the civil war and currently govern, and the ROC πΉπΌ gets the land that they got and currently govern. Cease-fire. No more "Chinese people killing other Chinese people."
Peaceful coexistence. No invasion from either side (even though ONLY ONE SIDE is doing that today.) There are 2 Koreas, 2 Congos, 2 Sudans, and hell, 4 Guineas. There's no reason why there can't be to Chinas, unless somebody wants to suggest we're an inferior people that can't?
You'd think that π¨π³ would be happy that they got the overwhelming majority of the land, but no, being their usually greedy selves they want as much as they can get away with.
And they get away with plenty, having gotten away with all their intimidation, coercion, blackmail, and escalation without facing any consequences, as usual. Due to being afraid of facing any kind of backlash from π¨π³ the international community always turns a blind eye for them.
The other solution comes from the grassroots "independence" movement. I put independence in " "s because Taiwan/ROCπΉπΌ is *already* independent.
Independence in this case would mean separating Taiwan from any idea of *any* China, whether it's the PRC π¨π³ or the ROC πΉπΌ .
Independence in this case would mean separating Taiwan from any idea of *any* China, whether it's the PRC π¨π³ or the ROC πΉπΌ .
One out of a million examples:
https://twitter.com/NewBambooCity/status/1573516834036363264?s=20&t=2vrNNggh5l3Il7GM9clbyw
And another example
https://twitter.com/bikhim/status/1572628991256809474?t=7IfJ57shHs8P3r1-aFgMDg&s=19
* in this case it would be separating from the government that currently governs Taiwan, the ROC πΉπΌ, as the PRC π¨π³ has *NEVER* governed Taiwan in any century, decade, year, month, week, day, hour, minute, or second before, and more importantly does not have the consent of the ppl
@UnrollHelper unroll please
This thread has since been censored for an unknown amount of time by @elonmusk and @lindayacc 's @Twitter .
https://twitter.com/danzwku/status/1663484478642348034?t=Wt2G5-zzBEKpxoTU6tf-jg&s=19
No I didn't mean this literally.
https://x.com/danzwku/status/1722809006862004449?s=20
β’ β’ β’
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
γ
