Historians estimate that the pyramids of Giza are roughly 5000 years old. This can't be verified for certain because you can't carbon date limestone.
You can, however, carbon date an eggshell. This one, found in Aswan, is 7000 years old, and depicts the pyramids beside the Nile.
Weird!
The Sphinx, also, cannot be carbon dated. But a quick glimpse at it from above is all you need to tell that the head is incredibly disproportionate to the rest of its body.
What's interesting is that roughly 12000 years ago, it would have been perfectly positioned to face the constellation Leo. You'll notice it's in the exact same pose as the constellation. I think it used to have a more proportional lion's head
12000 years ago is an interesting date, because that aligns with Plato's reckoning of the sinking of Atlantis. The Egyptian priest who supposedly told Solon the story of Atlantis claimed it existed roughly 9000 years before his time, and that story was told roughly 2500 years ago
Which lines up with the beginning of the Younger Dryas period, an era of intense cooling across the planet and the extinction of countless species of megafauna all around the world. Maybe even because of a meteor. You don't suppose that could have caused a flood?
I wonder what was so significant about the sky ~12000 years ago that the people who built Gobleki Tepe felt the need to immortalize the constellations in that position in stone forever!
Let's go back to the egg, though. What's that at the top? Concentric circles? If we're assuming this was a stylized map (which it was) this would be some kind of geographic feature, wouldn't it?
What's this weird series of concentric circles in the Sahara desert? And why does it look almost exactly how Atlantis was described?
If we assume the Egyptian priest who told Solon the story was aware enough of Atlantis (which existed 9000 years prior) to be able to describe it with any accuracy, one would imagine the Egyptian who carved into the egg, living even closer to the time, would be just as aware
Here's the Richat Structure, in the Mauritanian desert, surrounded by sand that looks like it was washed away by a giant wave
"Atlantis in the desert? What the fuck are you talking about?" I thought it was an island
It was! The Sahara used to be humid, and green, and the Eye of the Sahara used to be in a giant fucking river with access to the sea!
....as recently as 5000 years ago!!
"Alright Uncle Deluge, that's cool I guess but what else you got?"
The Richat Structure is in a region of the Sahara called the Adrar plateau, coming from an old Berber word, which probably means something like "rocky" or "mountain"
But this isn't the only place in the region with the name "Adrar," oh no, it's actually quite close to another, significantly more recognizable place
The ATLAS MOUNTAINS. Atlantis literally means "the island of Atlas"
Interesting that Berbers also appeared 12000 years ago. Wonder what would have happened that made them nomads in the Sahara?
Have a look at where "Atlantes" is
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Redditor believes Trump will be arrested on the eve of his Inauguration because his psychic neighbour had visions of Kamala being sworn in on election night
r/SomethingIsWrong2024 is gonna be really fun to read in a couple days (it already is because of stuff like this)
They think the inauguration isn't actually happening because the invitations are using a different format
In 871, Louis II and Basil I exchanged letters arguing over which of them had the better claim to being Roman Emperor. Basil's key point was that the Franks were a gens, a nation, an ethnicity, and Romans were not, disqualifying the Franks from having universal dominion
This perception I think is the biggest indicator of hegemony. So default has Englishness (and its immediate diaspora) become that often people forget it's even an ethnicity at all
Basil's definition of Roman was a people without a gens. To have one was uncivilized, tribal, the stuff of barbarians. To not be the default made you unfit to lord over anything but your own meagre race. He didn't consider himself a king, either, that was equally unsophisticated
Say what you will about Germany's colonial empire but it seems to be the only one that instilled any kind of cultural aversion to being a public nuisance in its former subjects if even a hundred years later Rwanda and Namibia don't slam on their horns like it's echolocation
Botswana, presumably, isn't densely populated enough for this to even be an issue
Also Namibia and Rwanda are both countries that have had genocides so perhaps that's also part of the secret sauce for polite drivers in Africa and why Cameroon and Togo for example did not inherit the Germanic desire for silence
A bit before the election I was reading an explicitly liberal subreddit (guilty pleasure) and their big plan to turn rwers away from wanting voter ID was to frame it as the "mark of the beast"
If they knew a single person who might be swayed by that, they'd know they don't vote!
Rattling sabres against a Frankenstein of the Westboro Baptist Church that speaks in tongues, obsessed with the Apocalypse and building the 3rd Temple in Israel (who they consider the chosen people—they're also antisemites), while having an itinerant priesthood of child molesters