Martin Bauer Profile picture
Sep 24, 2022 11 tweets 4 min read Read on X
How colliders are the best microscopes we can possibly build

A short thread 🧵1/10 Image
The human eye has a severely limited angular resolution. We can't tell apart points that are closer together than 0.02 degrees. This corresponds to a separation of 0.1 mm for points 30cm in front of us -about the thickness of hair. Anything closer together gets smeared out 2/10 Image
We can do better with lenses. The best light microscopes have a resolution of ~200 nm. This is 2x10^-7 m, about 1000 times better than a human eye. Good enough to look into the interior of cells

3/10 Image
But there is a limit. The wavelength of visible light is 700-380 nm. The best possible resolution R is roughly half the wavelength λ (even though there are modern techniques to overcome this limit by about an order of magnitude) 4/10 Image
However, quantum mechanics comes to the rescue. Every particle corresponds to a wave with a wavelength λ set by the de Broglie equation, where h is Plancks constant and p is the momentum of the particle 5/10 Image
If we accelerate for example an electron we will decrease its wavelength and eventually get better resolution than any light miscroscope can achieve.

Indeed, electron microscopes can resolve objects of a size of 10^-10 m: the size of an atom 6/10
Electron microscopes use high voltage to accelerate electrons, achieving short wavelengths in turn. Alternatively one can look at this as electrons scattering off the target.

Shorter wavelength = higher voltage

As a result ultra high voltage electron miscoscopes are huge 7/10 Image
In principle the wavelength can be shortened further.

Achieving the enormous momenta necessary to resolve structures smaller than an atom needs miles of electromagnets: a particle accelerator

Below is an aerial view of the linear accelerator in Stanford (SLAC) 8/10 Image
Particle accelerators can collide a beam of charged particles with a fixed target or with each other.

In that sense colliders are direct generalisations of microscopes with enormously increased resolution. Currently we can probe 7-8 orders of magnitude beyond the best EM 9/10
The debris from the collisions allows for a reconstruction of what the world looks like at these smallest scales in the same way as the reflected light from a macroscopic object is detected by our eyes and allows our brains to reconstruct an image 10/10 Image
Colliders are limited by size and the power of the electromagnets.

We haven't exhausted this technology yet, but there are novel technologies, like plasma wakefield acelerators. If we can master this, the future best microscopes could look even more alien to us 11/10

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Martin Bauer

Martin Bauer Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @martinmbauer

Mar 16
The basic idea of renormalisation: A sketch

In Quantum field theory with interactions, there're corrections to fundamental constants

The electron mass is corrected because of the presence of the photon field

So what is measured in an experiment is the 'corrected mass' mr

1/9 Image
You can only ever measure mr

In order to measure m0 you'd need to be able to turn off the photon field. Not the presence of any number of photons, but the existence of a photon field overall -like a Universe where photons don't exist.

We can't do that: m0 is unobservable

2/9
For finite values of L the 'correction' is finite and we simply define the measured mass as the difference between m0 and a finite integral

But even in the limit L -> ∞, where the integral diverges, one can define mr as

3/9 Image
Read 9 tweets
Feb 3
The Higgs can decay into a vector meson and a photon H → J/Ψ γ → μ+μ− γ

This process is so rare, it takes a quadrillion (10^15) collisions to see it once at the LHC!

It took 8+ yrs for CMS&ATLAS to see a few of these decays and now they test a never observed effect

🧵1/12 Image
According to the standard model the Higgs boson interacts with all quarks with an interaction strength directly proportional to the quark mass.

Even though there're 6 types of quarks we've only good measurements for 2 of them : top and bottom

2/12 Image
The reason is that these are the heaviest quarks and the Higgs production is dominated by its interaction with the top quark and the most likely decay is into bottom quarks

3/12
Read 13 tweets
Jan 15
A thread on Mermin's device used to demonstrate that Nature can't be classical

Feynman called Mermin's paper: "One of the most beautiful papers in physics that I know"

It has a switch with 3 settings and 2 lights flashing either red or green:

🧵 1/10 Image
The full experiment has 2 such devices (A&B) and a source that spits out pairs of particles (C). Every time a particle enters a device it flashes red or green (not both)

2/10 Image
The two devices are completely unconnected and can't communicate

The switch is in a random setting (to be set any time, it doesn't matter whether the particle has left the source or not)

We write 11, 22, 33 if the settings are the same, 12, 32, 13 etc if they're different

3/10 Image
Read 10 tweets
Dec 30, 2023
Physics threads 2023

Happy 2024 everyone!
Read 23 tweets
Dec 9, 2023
If you want to define a continuous addition you get the Riemann integral

This is what happens if you want to define a continuous *product*

One of the weirdest and most satisfying integrals you've ever seen and why it's important for physics

(a quite technical 🧵) 1/12 Image
If you derive the Riemann integral you do so by approximating the area under a function with discrete blocks and take the limit of their sum where they become infinitesimally thin
2/12 Image
But what happens if instead of the sum you take the product? You get the 'product integral'

(the last equality is just notation)

3/12 Image
Read 12 tweets
Nov 25, 2023
The Aharanov-Bohm effect

Weisskopf said: The first reaction to this work is that it is wrong; the second is that it is obvious

Ehrenberg said: Ach Hiley, zis AB effect that you are discussing, is it the one that Siday and I discovered?

What is it?

1/9 🧵 Image
The Aharonov-Bohm effect is an -at first- surprising effect on charged particles moving around a cylinder in which there is a magnetic field

Outside the cylinder the magnetic field is zero but you can see a different interference pattern if the magnetic field is turned on

2/9 Image
That seems contradictory at first. How can the particle moving around the cylinder know there is a magnetic field *inside* the cylinder?

Answer: the phase of the wave function of the particle picks up a phase when it moves through a region with non-zero vector potential

3/9 Image
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(