Martin Bauer Profile picture
Sep 24, 2022 11 tweets 4 min read Read on X
How colliders are the best microscopes we can possibly build

A short thread 🧵1/10 Image
The human eye has a severely limited angular resolution. We can't tell apart points that are closer together than 0.02 degrees. This corresponds to a separation of 0.1 mm for points 30cm in front of us -about the thickness of hair. Anything closer together gets smeared out 2/10 Image
We can do better with lenses. The best light microscopes have a resolution of ~200 nm. This is 2x10^-7 m, about 1000 times better than a human eye. Good enough to look into the interior of cells

3/10 Image
But there is a limit. The wavelength of visible light is 700-380 nm. The best possible resolution R is roughly half the wavelength λ (even though there are modern techniques to overcome this limit by about an order of magnitude) 4/10 Image
However, quantum mechanics comes to the rescue. Every particle corresponds to a wave with a wavelength λ set by the de Broglie equation, where h is Plancks constant and p is the momentum of the particle 5/10 Image
If we accelerate for example an electron we will decrease its wavelength and eventually get better resolution than any light miscroscope can achieve.

Indeed, electron microscopes can resolve objects of a size of 10^-10 m: the size of an atom 6/10
Electron microscopes use high voltage to accelerate electrons, achieving short wavelengths in turn. Alternatively one can look at this as electrons scattering off the target.

Shorter wavelength = higher voltage

As a result ultra high voltage electron miscoscopes are huge 7/10 Image
In principle the wavelength can be shortened further.

Achieving the enormous momenta necessary to resolve structures smaller than an atom needs miles of electromagnets: a particle accelerator

Below is an aerial view of the linear accelerator in Stanford (SLAC) 8/10 Image
Particle accelerators can collide a beam of charged particles with a fixed target or with each other.

In that sense colliders are direct generalisations of microscopes with enormously increased resolution. Currently we can probe 7-8 orders of magnitude beyond the best EM 9/10
The debris from the collisions allows for a reconstruction of what the world looks like at these smallest scales in the same way as the reflected light from a macroscopic object is detected by our eyes and allows our brains to reconstruct an image 10/10 Image
Colliders are limited by size and the power of the electromagnets.

We haven't exhausted this technology yet, but there are novel technologies, like plasma wakefield acelerators. If we can master this, the future best microscopes could look even more alien to us 11/10

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Martin Bauer

Martin Bauer Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @martinmbauer

May 4
Does quantum mechanics really need to be complex?

Why can't we just use real wavefunctions?

🧵1/15 *some math, non-relativistic QM Image
First of all, not all wavefunctions are complex. The Schrödinger equation tells us that time-independent (stationary) solutions can be real. These are energy eigenstates, e.g. a bound state in an hydrogen atom

But even if you start with a real wavefunction, time-evolution introduces an imaginary part

2/15Image
Time-evolution for a real-valued wavefunction correspond to a global phase. But global phases don't have observable consequences

3/15 Image
Read 15 tweets
Apr 21
Renormalisation is a central concept in modern physics. It describes how the dynamics of a system change at different scales. A great way to understand and visualise renormalisation is the Ising model

(some math, but one can follow without it )

1/13
Start with a lattice and assign two possible values to each vertex (+1/-1 here) and an interaction between each point with its next neighbours. Mathematically this interaction can be written as a sum, where the parameter beta decides how strongly the vertices interact (beta=0 is no interaction)

2/13Image
An example for such a system would be a (2D) magnet, where the vertices label magnetic moments. The probability of finding the whole lattice in a specific combination of +1/-1 distributions is then given by the exponential below. (Z(beta) is just a normalisation constant, we'll ignore it)

3/13Image
Read 12 tweets
Feb 18
The most energetic neutrino ever observed just smashed into the Mediterranean and left a signal that was picked up by the K3Mnet neutrino telescope 2400m under the sea

At the moment we don't really know where this neutrino came from, nor should it really be there.

🧵1/10
Neutrinos that hit water or ice can kick and electron out of its atom with so much momentum that its speed exceeds the speed of light (in the medium). What happens than is the light equivalent of a sonic boom: Cherenkov radiation

The same effect makes nuclear reactors shine blue

2/10
Neutrino telescopes are large arrays of photomultipliers that can detect that light and reconstruct the energy, type of neutrino and direction it came from. They use the sea as a detector. K3Mnet operates 2400m under the sea

3/10 Image
Read 10 tweets
Jan 2
Really nice, short ASCI history of physics (from Piet Hut, IAS)

From the babylonians to Aristoteles:

🧵 1/12 Image
Newton rings in the modern age ~1700

2/12 Image
New forces : Electricity and magnetism break newtons simple picture ~1800

3/12 Image
Read 13 tweets
Dec 19, 2024
Could we tell whether anyone in our galaxy uses a warp drive?

This sounds like a crazy question, but it can be answered using numerical GR

(one of the fun highlights of the annual theory meeting presented by Katy Clough)

🧵1/7 Image
In GR, a 'warp drive' corresponds to a gravitational distortion of spacetime

In 94 it was shown that this is possible in principle by contracting space in front of of a spaceship and expanding space behind it (if you believe the aliens discovered negative mass) by Alcubierre

2/7Image
If a space-ship used that technique it would be surrounded by a 'warp bubble' moving through the galaxy. And this results in gravitational waves moving away from that path

3/7
Read 7 tweets
Oct 28, 2024
We shall call the particles making up atoms electrons and quarks

-Quarks, sir?

Yes. Up and down quarks

-Will we call particles associated with forces quarks, too?

No, they shall be called photons and gluons

-What about the weak force, sir?

Those shall be called W and Z Image
Won’t we use other letters?

-None of them, but greek letters shall be used for the heavy partners of the electron, the muon and tau

-What about other greek letters?

We shall use rho, pion, kaon, eta, etc

Are those also heavy electrons sir?

-No, those are made from quarks
-What about alpha, beta and gamma sir?

We shall use those, too.

-For other particles made from quarks?

no, gamma will be used for photons and beta for electrons

-And alpha?

Alpha shall be the name for a whole helium nucleus
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(