Important that journalists call out the falling £ and rising cost of government borrowing for what it is:
An "incompetency premium".
Quick 🧵
How do we know this?
Government borrowing is reflationary, resulting in high interest rates, which all else equal should put *upwards* pressure on £.
This makes the recent movement all the more remarkable.
So why is £ falling? Best explanation is that markets think policy is incoherent.
They don't buy (literally) the government's argument that tax cuts on the rich will improve economic supply, and therefore the medium/long run growth rate of the economy.
This means markets are not expecting increased investment into the UK (demand for £).
It's possible they fear the opposite - surplus savings in £ chasing the same amount of viable domestic investment, leading to people investing £ offshore (sales of £).
Another way of putting this is the thing you are borrowing for matters because markets take a view.
The question that has been asked is whether borrowing for tax cuts will improve the future health of the economy? The answer we've had since Friday is a resounding 'no'.
What next?
Pressure will now build on Bank of England to try and offset (or rather, 'price-in') the "incompetency premium" for the UK economy with higher interest rates.
That means we all pay the price: high borrowing costs, less investment, fewer new jobs & lower wages.
Quite an impressively destructive piece of policy making for a so-called 'mini' budget.
End.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
While Truss' tax cuts will widen inequality & do little to protect families where it is needed most, freezing energy bills at April 2022 levels could be the first time government has provided a response that measures up to the scale of this crisis.
But at a similar cost over a year to running the NHS in England, it is an emergency measure that cannot last more than a few months.
The time bought from a price freeze must be used to put in place more lasting solutions.
NEF need three things: minimum free energy for all, funded by a premium price for energy above this level; a permanent new 'energy element' in benefits funded from capital gains tax, & a 'cost of living allowance' for all households paid for through a windfall tax on oil and gas
Winter is coming, but we need to think to what's coming next.
By Apr 2023, even after accounting for wage growth & benefit uprating, annual family costs are set to grow £3,100 faster than incomes on average since April 2021
New @NEF research out today, including solutions 1/🧵
This crisis will be measured in years rather than months.
Typical direct debit bills are rising above £3,500 this Oct, but they are set to nearly double by the spring & remain close to £6,000 for the rest of 2023. 2/
The response from government so far has ticked all four of the wrong boxes: too little; too late; poorly targeted; & overly complicated.
Even if existing government support were to be extended, families will still face an average black hole of £2,400 by spring, vs 2021. 3/
High productivity (amount produced per time spent working) is a key ingredient for an economy that works for people, society & planet.
1) Alongside good labour regulation, high productivity is an enabler of good pay for workers & closely correlated with earnings across time 2/18
2) Across countries, higher productivity is also associated with social benefits like higher life
expectancy & reduced child mortality (H/T Silvana Tenreyro bankofengland.co.uk/-/media/boe/fi…)
3) While doing more (or the same) with
less is crucial to environmental sustainability 3/18
Today's @OBR_UK 'Fiscal risks report' is in headlines for its Brexit 'stress test'. But it also happens to include their first attempt at climate analysis.
Although a welcome move, the bigger picture is the OBR has got things the wrong way around 1/11
By 'fiscal risks', OBR tends to mean things that may increase public borrowing. But this ignores a key point: public balance sheets are there to absorb risk. They are there to *assume*, not avoid, risks that would otherwise cause more harm if left to fall on families & firms 2/11
EG government can pool individual risk of getting ill via taxes & free health. Borrowing to build a hospital can also spread risk through time: the interest & debt repayments ensure all the future tax payers who visit the hospital also contribute to the cost of building it 3/11
New @NEF analysis out today shows effects of austerity since 2010 have had standalone effect of making economy £100bn smaller per year, £3600 per family
Rarely has sustained, deliberate action by a UK government caused so much harm to its own country 1/13 neweconomics.org/2019/02/auster…
Today’s public sector finance release will likely show we’re on course for the smallest government deficit – difference between public spending and revenue – since 2001. What they don’t show is the economic damage it has caused to get here. 2/13 ons.gov.uk/economy/govern…
The human impacts have always been clear. Whether rising homelessness, frozen benefit payments, overcrowded school classes or excessive A&E waits, the starved ambition and resources of our public realm have touched the lives of almost everyone. 3/13 independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-n…
Yesterday a think tank policy director told me live on radio that working people shouldn't have to pay for children in families on benefits.
Their view is either staggeringly ignorant of the basics of tax & welfare policy or else guilty of the worst kind of political motive. 1/4
1. Whether in or out of work, we all pay tax. Income tax & NICs are worth just 1/3 of the tax base. Billions of £s are paid in VAT/council tax/fuel duty by people out of work every single year.
2. Most welfare claimants also pay income tax. Income tax is calculated annually and 75% of out-of-work claims last less than 12 months -- most move directly back into work. Even more importantly, 56% of families receiving the child element of Universal Credit are also in work.