I don't want to disappoint those wanting a speedy denouement to current market events. But it's a long and repeated game. We have a floating currency which withstands day to day market pressures. London is one of the deepest capital markets in the world. 1/
Prices can and do adjust. Most mortgage holders have at least a 2 year fixed term; many have 5 year fixes. The Bank of England don't want to be accused of causing panic (see their recent statement). They have a reputation to preserve. 2/
So, current market pressures will play themselves out over weeks and months. At any point the "authorities" can take countervailing action though none of the options is good for growth. 3/
HMG has broken a cardinal rule: don't look like an outlier relative to other G7 countries. The markets now have sterling and gilts in its sights. There will be rallies followed by brief substantive lurches downwards. We probably haven't seen the bottom. 4/
Meanwhile, the UK will pay a high risk premium for the increased debt it is selling, making it all but impossible to live within spending plans, even before inflation. HMG is expecting public sector workers to take bigger real wage cuts even than in 1931, which led to mutiny 5/
This is an unsustainable equilibrium. Difficult times lie ahead. On the bright side, the British people and the governments they elect generally learn from policy errors...in the end. And so I expect greater realism and better leadership (sometime) in the future. #soundmoney
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A short thread on the history of direct taxes over the last century. The 1906 Liberal government introduced the principle that "unearned income" should be taxed at a higher rate than "earned income". This was bad news for rentiers and capitalists. Better news for workers 1/
In the People's Budget, Lloyd George widened the differential so that at the standard rate "unearned" income incurred a tax rate more than 50 per cent higher than "earned" income. For the next 70 years, Labour and Tory governments broadly accepted this principle. 2/
In the 1970s, the investment income surcharge meant those with high rental/dividend income faced a marginal rate 15% higher than those on high earnings. Then, Barbara Castle introduced the principle of earnings related national insurance to pay for earnings related benefits 3/
Over the next 7 days we will hear a lot about "fiscal rules" . First point: they are not rules. How could they be when they are changed with monotonous regularity? Rather, they are targets, or more correctly, objectives. 1/8
Second point, they only constrain policy for 12-18 months before the consequences of meeting them becomes unpalatable to the electorate and hence to government. At that point, they are suspended and then discarded. 2/8
In the past, governments changed definitions or assumptions in order to meet them. This is no longer a credible option because the independent Office for Budgetary Responsibility calls them out. 3/8