"Once we got a look at Dimorphos, we were very confident we were going to hit." (If Dimorphos had been a contact binary like comet Churyumov-Gerasimenko or New Horizons' target Arrokoth, a nearly direct hit on its centroid could've turned into a miss. Fortunately, it was round.)
I tried to call in to the press briefing to ask a question about image release plans, but, technical difficulties. There was one question on the briefing about LICIAcube plans... 1/n
Briefing quote(ish): "40 minutes before impact our Italian colleagues were shooting to get an extended [DSN] pass about 3 hours from now. It's a matter of can the DSN schedule the pass." Let me interpret what I *think* this means (caveat lector): 2/n
The Italian-built LICIAcube is run by the Italian space agency ASI. ASI has an agreement with NASA for irreplaceable time on NASA's Deep Space Network for its mission. They have scheduled comms passes that are necessary to maintain knowledge of spacecraft health. 3/n
Images take a LOT of data. The upcoming LICIAcube pass may not be long enough to transmit an image in addition to the spacecraft telemetry that informs us about its health. But LICIAcube (via ASI) is asking to see if the pass can be extended long enough for 1 pic to transmit 4/n
Eventually, all of LICIAcube's images will come down. But they aren't urgently needed for mission success or to understand health of spacecraft. They'll come down to Earth as and when time permits, a couple per day at most. We'll have to be patient. 5/n
Deep-space telecommunications is one of the biggest bottlenecks to science generally. The DSN is waaaaaay oversubscribed, but like freeway bridges, they're "just" infrastructure and it's always hard to get them the $ they need to upgrade/expand. 6/n
So in summary, we may get a LICIAcube image today; we might not. We'll get them eventually. The important thing is that #DARTmission succeeded, and LICIAcube is in good health, so the images probably exist. We hope! 7/7
LICIAcube was 165 seconds out from Dimorphos at the moment of impact, and closest approach was 55ish km away from the moon; it was totally safe from any impact-generated plume.
Oooh I hadn't thought of this. So in summary: There is DSN comms time that was allocated to #DARTmission in case something went wrong. Since it worked, the time could, if requested and approved, be reallocated to LICIAcube for image downlink.
Here's the replay of the DRACO camera view of the #DARTMission impact onto Dimorphos, the moon of Didymos earlier today. Now time for me to play with some images...
Thar they are! Right now Dimorphos and Didymos are both this bright dot of light. They’ll separate into two dots in a little while. #DARTMission
I’ll add photos on to this thread periodically as approach continues.
At the moment, this is the only source for the approach images. If they have not appeared on a website by the time of the post-impact press briefing scheduled for (I think) 5pm Pacific time, I will ask! #DARTmission
So one hour prior to impact, or roughly 35 minutes after this tweet, the #DARTmission photos should start separating the two components of the Dimorphos system.
Just six hours to #DARTMission#DARTsmash now. The live feed from DART's DRACO camera will pick up at 2:30pm California time, a little more than 4 hours from now. eeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
I just got off WebEx with Justin Maki, who leads of the Perseverance engineering camera team. I've learned a lot and gotten a lot of confused questions sorted out. I'll try to bang out a blog entry with lots of techy detail about raw images tomorrow.
The TL;DR: of the interview was: a lot of the things that are weird and confusing in the raw image metadata from sols 1-4 have to do with the rover being on the cruise flight software at the time.
For example, the cruise flight software did not "know" how to automatically create image thumbnails. So they had to instruct the rover computer with separate commands to make thumbnails for each image, which is why sequence IDs don't match up between thumbnail and full-res.
OK, *cracking knuckles* time for me to wrap my head around the Perseverance raw image data set. Thanks to @Miscul for helping me out with a dump of the metadata. Here's a list of other resources:
Photos sent from space are pretty enough but they're not science without metadata. I loooooooooove metadata. I'm gonna dig in and see what I can learn & understand about how I'm going to be able to follow this mission through its images.
Update: I've successfully gotten a grip on what most Perseverance metadata describes. Coolest thing is extremely detailed geometric information on rover position & orientation and camera pointing & image distortion. Coders could use all that to make some great visualization apps.
Hi! I'm Emily Lakdawalla and I love to talk and teach about space exploration & science communication. I'm now self-employed, available to speak, write, & consult. My website: lakdawalla.com/emily. My blog and Patreon: patreon.com/elakdawalla
My first book was "The Design and Engineering of Curiosity: How The Mars Rover Performs Its Job" published by Springer-Praxis. I'm working on a sequel about Curiosity's science results. springer.com/gp/book/978331…