Robert Peston Profile picture
Sep 28, 2022 14 tweets 3 min read Read on X
I am going to try to explain why the Bank of England has gone into the market to buy up to £65bn of UK government bonds with maturities of 20 years or more, including £1bn today. It all stems from a dramatic collapse in the price of these government bonds, called gilts, a...
collapse magnified by Friday's fiscally loose mini budget. The collapse in these prices caused a liquidity crisis for what are called Liability Driven Investment funds, which have a gross value of roughly £1.5 trillion, of which a staggering £1 trillion has been invested in...
gilts and other bonds. These are largely leveraged funds, which means that when they buy gilts, they frequently use them as collateral to raise cash (in what's known as the Repo market), then use the cash to buy more gilts, then pledge the gilts again and buy more gilts, and...
so on. Now the risk of raising money in this way is that when the value of that collateral collapses, which it has done with the crash in gilt prices, the funds have to somehow find cash either to repay the money they've borrowed or pledge more collateral. This pressure was...
forcing them to sell more gilts and other assets, driving down the prices of those gilts and other assets, in a way that could undermine their solvency and the solvency of other important institutions that are invested in these gilts (and other...
assets). It risked a markets bloodbath. And the point I haven't made till now (sorry) is these Liability Driven Investment funds (LDIs) were owned by final salary pension schemes, as devices to better match their liabilities to millions of pensioners with future income...
from assets. The huge immediate risk was that these pension funds themselves would become formally insolvent, because their liabilities to the LDIs would be greater than their assets. So what the Bank of England has today tried to do, with these emergency...
purchases of gilts, is to drive up the price of gilts, to give time to the LDIs to sell assets in a more orderly way, such that the re-pricing of the gilts doesn't lead to that markets bloodbath. And so far, it seems to be working. BUT the Bank of England accepts that...
all it is doing is managing the transition to lower gilt prices, and higher yields (or interest rates on government bonds), in an orderly way. And it accepts that gilt prices may ultimately fall back to those lower levels. Which means that it will be incurring losses on...
the £65bn of bonds it has commited to buy. Except actually the losses won't be the Bank's losses. The losses will sit with taxpayers, since Kwarteng and the Treasury have indemnified the Bank of England for any falls in value of the bonds it buys. Or to put it another...
way, this is not some magic rescue. It will cost someone a lot of money. And that someone is probably the government, and therefore taxpayers. Finally, though, it should not be the case that if you are in a final salary pension scheme your pension is at risk. The reason...
is that the pension regulator calculates the value of a pension scheme's liabilities by using a discount rate on the future cash value of pensioner payments that is linked to the gilt yield, and when that yield rises, the prevent value of those liabilities actually...
falls. So here is the almighty paradox. Pension funds could have collapsed today because of a shortage of cash or liquidity. But having been bailed out by the Bank of England, at some cost to taxpayers, pension funds should emerge stronger. Strange but true. None...
of this, however, absolves Kwasi Kwarteng or Liz Truss from responsibility from a wholly avoidable crisis. If they hadn't pushed the fiscal boat out with their too loose mini budget, the Bank of England would not have had to wade into the market with £65bn of our money.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Robert Peston

Robert Peston Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Peston

Jun 11, 2023
Downing St has taken the highly unusual step of declassifying the list of Boris Johnson’s proposed peers that was approved by the House of Lords Appointments Commission (attached). They did this to “prove” that the PM had not lied to Johnson when telling him he would approve… Image
the ex PM’s list, when they met earlier this month - and to reinforce Downing St’s claim that Sunak had not interfered to prevent Alok Sharma, Nadine Dorries or Nigel Adams receiving peerages. But it does not add up. The important points are 1) that this list was sent to the PM…
in February and 2) HOLAC was not prepared to create a precedent of approving peerages unless the recipients would undertake to stand down as MPs and join the Lords within six months of announcement. And here is the point. My understanding is…
Read 8 tweets
Jun 9, 2023
Johnson’s peerages for ultra loyalists. Not clear whether Dorries and Sharmer asked that they be removed from list. If so it seems unlikely Dorries will get now get a deferred one given she today triggered by-election Sunak needs like hole in head. Downing St says list… Image
is nothing to do with them. PM’s press secretary: “As is convention, the Prime Minister forwarded the former Prime Minister’s peerage list to HOLAC unaltered. HOLAC then passed back their approved list. The Prime Minister then accepted HOLAC's approved list and forwarded…
“it unamended to the Sovereign for their approval. He had no involvement or input into the approved list. It is a point of fact that it is made public by the Commission if a Prime Minister overrules the Commission’s advice." In case you don’t know, HOLAC is the House of…
Read 5 tweets
Jun 7, 2023
The seizure of Telegraph and Spectator by Lloyds is a humiliating close to the Barclay family's control of two trophy media assets. Aidan and Howard Barclay have been removed from the businesses, because debts running to hundreds of million pounds haven't been serviced...
The legal transfer of control to Lloyds happened in last couple of hours. The debt was originally provided by and still sits in Lloyds' Bank of Scotland subsidiary. It's like watching the slowest motion car crash in history, because the debt or leverage all stems from...
the reckless banking boom of 15 years ago. Lloyds is expected to organise an auction of the newspaper and the magazine - and their associated digital operations - which are said to be decent performers in operating terms. A disposal could raise £600m (perhaps)...
Read 7 tweets
May 23, 2023
Too much of government is arguably
aimed at clearing up supposed problems of their own making. An example is today's announcement by Braverman to abolish the right of overseas students on undergraduate and non-research courses to bring spouses and children to the UK. 🧵 1/18
Here is the important background.
In their 2019 general election manifesto, Boris Johnson and the Conservative Party pledged to reduce net migration to the UK to less than the 212,000 per annum prevailing when they wrote that manifesto. 2/18
That target will be spectacularly
missed in the lifetime of this parliament. Under this government, new all-time records are being set for migration to the UK - with migration numbers far exceeding the flows from the EU that were seen by Brexiters as out of control. 3/18
Read 18 tweets
May 2, 2023
Sue Gray suspended co-operation with the Cabinet Office investigation into the circumstances of her departure because she found out the investigation was already using info - on dates of her meetings with Starmer etc - that she had supplied to ACOBA via the Cabinet Office. She…
viewed this, understandably, as a breach of process and confidentiality. This hijack of her ACOBA disclosure also undermined the impartiality of ACOBA, the advisory body on how long government and Whitehall defectors should stay in the wilderness. Gray’s…
views were, I understand, relayed to the Cabinet Secretary, Simon Case, who agreed with her. Which is why it was impossible for the deputy PM Oliver Dowden to publish a report today on whether she breached the civil service code, in spite of weekend briefings that…
Read 4 tweets
May 2, 2023
By the way, when Deputy PM Dowden says Sue Gray has chosen not to supply information to a civil service investigation into the circumstances of her departure, I am not sure that's sinister. My understanding is it's because that information will be supplied to Dowden and...
Cab Sec Simon Case via ACOBA - the government body that advises on whether ministers and senior officials should spend time in the wilderness before taking new jobs. She has given ACOBA all relevant info on her talks with Starmer and Labour, and that will be passed back to...
the Cabinet Office and Downing Street in the next couple of weeks or so. The moment of truth for Gray and Starmer on her appointment as his chief of staff will come when ACOBA makes its recommendation on how long she should spend on gardening leave before joining him. For...
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(