matt blaze Profile picture
Sep 29 10 tweets 2 min read
Another cleared (former) USG employee who thought he was selling classified docs to a foreign embassy (unspecified which one), but was actually dealing with the FBI. Echos of the recent Brazil nuclear sub case.
A remarkable thing in the affidavit (linked in the press release) is how quickly he was caught. Only a couple month from initial contact to arrest.
Spying is not, evidently, for amateurs.
Remember, if you ask a foreign diplomat if they're actually an FBI agent, they have to tell you.

#ThingsThatAreWrong
Some important details omitted from the affidavit.

How did Dalke initially contact the FBI? The narrative starts with the FBI UC emailing him at Dalke's burner (I presume Proton) email address. But how did the FBI get that address in the first place and know he'd be interested?
Presumably Dalke contacted someone he thought represented the SVR or GRU and gave them Email-Address-1. So either that was actually the FBI,, or the FBI intercepted that initial contact and replied before the real SVR or GRU did.

In any case, the FBI played him like a fiddle.
If there's a trial, some of this will likely come out, but these cases only rarely go to trial.
They also omitted the details of the arrest (presumably because the affidavit was written before that). I'd imagine they arrested him at (Denver) Union Station, and seized whatever device he used to transmit the docs.
And in another dumb espionage case from today, an Army doctor and spouse allegedly tried to sell medical records of US military personnel to the Russians, but, of course, it was actually the FBI.

Not classified, but the mother of all HIPAA violations.

justice.gov/usao-md/press-…
Yes, they were charged with an actual, honest-to-goodness HIPAA violation.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with matt blaze

matt blaze Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @mattblaze

Sep 29
I bought a couple of these to use as travel chargers; maybe you did, too. Be warned.
Also notable that this "recall" is pretty weak. It requires filling out a separate form for each unit purchased, waiting several weeks for a "return kit", and then getting a credit useful only for purchases from the same company. Not great for a fire hazard. cc @USCPSC
I'd pay a premium for a USB charger that:
- charges my laptop at 100W plus phone at the same time
- has USB-C and USB-A ports
- is small and light enough to not be noticeable in my bag
- reliably stays plugged in to wall outlets
- doesn't spew RFI

That last one is non-trivial.
Read 6 tweets
Sep 26
NASA doing the ritual post-mission group hug.
DART before impact:

Hey! What’s this thing suddenly coming towards me very fast? Very very fast. So big and flat and round, it needs a big wide sounding name like … ow … ound … round … ground! That’s it! That’s a good name – ground!

I wonder if it will be friends with me?
RIP Douglas Adams
Read 4 tweets
Sep 13
Loaded the release version of iOS 16 earlier today and have been running with full lockdown mode on, so far without difficulty or anything disrupting my normal usage.

You can turn it off for specific apps, but I've not needed to.
Basically, lockdown mode seems to just give me the ability to turn off features I've never been comfortable having on in the first place.
I really like the idea behind Lockdown Mode, too. It acknowledges that there will always be (unknown) bugs and vulnerabilities in the platform, and reduces the attack surface to make them less likely to be remotely exploitable. Doesn't guarantee anything, but tilts the odds.
Read 5 tweets
Sep 7
This article, for all its detail, doesn't actually tell us very much, and suggests that the nuclear weapons docs (describing with a foreign country's nuclear defenses) might have actually been among the LESS sensitive material found.

washingtonpost.com/national-secur…
Nuclear weapons have a parallel classification system under the Atomic Energy act, with two major categories: "Restricted Data (RD)" and the incomprehensibly named "Formerly Restricted Data (FRD)".
RD includes things like weapons design data. FRD includes things that relate to military use of nuclear weapons, but that don't rise to the level of RD.

The subpoena (apparently) mentioned FRD docs, but not RD. That's consistent with a doc describing a foreign gov't defenses.
Read 4 tweets
Sep 2
There are known security vulnerabilities in many parts of our election infrastructure; that’s incontrovertibly true. But that is not the same as evidence that any election outcome was “rigged” by hacking (and in fact, there’s no evidence any actual US election has been).
Dishonest activists (left, right, and center) have long been conflating these two things to claim that some election outcomes they dislike was stolen. The difference is that before now, they didn’t have a presidential candidate amplifying them.
Election security is improving, and we now have tools, like Risk Limiting Audits, to conduct high-integrity elections even with insecure hardware and software. But there’s much work still to be done to deploy these safeguards everywhere.
Read 4 tweets
Aug 31
The classified docs on the carpet in the now-famous photo were recovered from "a container in the '45 office'".

The term "container", as opposed to "box" is notable. In government-speak, container can mean a safe. So perhaps this is what was in 45's (likely crappy) safe. Image
One can only wonder why these particular docs were in the office rather than the storage room. Was it because he recognized their high level of sensitivity and wanted to keep them in a safe? Or was it that he wanted ready access to them for some reason?
Neither answer is good for Trump. If the former, it means he knew he had extremely sensitive documents. If the latter, what was he doing with them?
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(