Another cleared (former) USG employee who thought he was selling classified docs to a foreign embassy (unspecified which one), but was actually dealing with the FBI. Echos of the recent Brazil nuclear sub case.
Some important details omitted from the affidavit.
How did Dalke initially contact the FBI? The narrative starts with the FBI UC emailing him at Dalke's burner (I presume Proton) email address. But how did the FBI get that address in the first place and know he'd be interested?
Presumably Dalke contacted someone he thought represented the SVR or GRU and gave them Email-Address-1. So either that was actually the FBI,, or the FBI intercepted that initial contact and replied before the real SVR or GRU did.
In any case, the FBI played him like a fiddle.
If there's a trial, some of this will likely come out, but these cases only rarely go to trial.
They also omitted the details of the arrest (presumably because the affidavit was written before that). I'd imagine they arrested him at (Denver) Union Station, and seized whatever device he used to transmit the docs.
And in another dumb espionage case from today, an Army doctor and spouse allegedly tried to sell medical records of US military personnel to the Russians, but, of course, it was actually the FBI.
Not classified, but the mother of all HIPAA violations.
Also notable that this "recall" is pretty weak. It requires filling out a separate form for each unit purchased, waiting several weeks for a "return kit", and then getting a credit useful only for purchases from the same company. Not great for a fire hazard. cc @USCPSC
I'd pay a premium for a USB charger that:
- charges my laptop at 100W plus phone at the same time
- has USB-C and USB-A ports
- is small and light enough to not be noticeable in my bag
- reliably stays plugged in to wall outlets
- doesn't spew RFI
Hey! What’s this thing suddenly coming towards me very fast? Very very fast. So big and flat and round, it needs a big wide sounding name like … ow … ound … round … ground! That’s it! That’s a good name – ground!
Loaded the release version of iOS 16 earlier today and have been running with full lockdown mode on, so far without difficulty or anything disrupting my normal usage.
You can turn it off for specific apps, but I've not needed to.
Basically, lockdown mode seems to just give me the ability to turn off features I've never been comfortable having on in the first place.
I really like the idea behind Lockdown Mode, too. It acknowledges that there will always be (unknown) bugs and vulnerabilities in the platform, and reduces the attack surface to make them less likely to be remotely exploitable. Doesn't guarantee anything, but tilts the odds.
This article, for all its detail, doesn't actually tell us very much, and suggests that the nuclear weapons docs (describing with a foreign country's nuclear defenses) might have actually been among the LESS sensitive material found.
Nuclear weapons have a parallel classification system under the Atomic Energy act, with two major categories: "Restricted Data (RD)" and the incomprehensibly named "Formerly Restricted Data (FRD)".
RD includes things like weapons design data. FRD includes things that relate to military use of nuclear weapons, but that don't rise to the level of RD.
The subpoena (apparently) mentioned FRD docs, but not RD. That's consistent with a doc describing a foreign gov't defenses.
There are known security vulnerabilities in many parts of our election infrastructure; that’s incontrovertibly true. But that is not the same as evidence that any election outcome was “rigged” by hacking (and in fact, there’s no evidence any actual US election has been).
Dishonest activists (left, right, and center) have long been conflating these two things to claim that some election outcomes they dislike was stolen. The difference is that before now, they didn’t have a presidential candidate amplifying them.
Election security is improving, and we now have tools, like Risk Limiting Audits, to conduct high-integrity elections even with insecure hardware and software. But there’s much work still to be done to deploy these safeguards everywhere.
The classified docs on the carpet in the now-famous photo were recovered from "a container in the '45 office'".
The term "container", as opposed to "box" is notable. In government-speak, container can mean a safe. So perhaps this is what was in 45's (likely crappy) safe.
One can only wonder why these particular docs were in the office rather than the storage room. Was it because he recognized their high level of sensitivity and wanted to keep them in a safe? Or was it that he wanted ready access to them for some reason?
Neither answer is good for Trump. If the former, it means he knew he had extremely sensitive documents. If the latter, what was he doing with them?