Things I say rarely get commented on by Owen Jones, Billy Bragg, Robin Moira White etc.. but the library rhyme time scheme really seemed to hit a nerve with these people and the hoards of TRA/MRA trolls who are playing it for lols.
A bunch of people have jumped on me saying I am criticising a book. Just to be clear: this isn’t a book (people can write crappy books with ugly cartoon characters if they want). This is about a public library scheme for parents (mainly mothers) and toddlers.
My concerns (following a message from a mum who said it felt ideological, creepy and gaslighting) were: 1. It is promoting gender ideology (non-binary, they/them pronouns) to children 2. It is excluding parents (mainly mothers) who don’t want this.
Billy Bragg suggested that I am “denying that men can have a role as care givers”.
This is obviously silly.
The fact is that most infants are mainly looked after by their mothers. This is part of women’s lives.
Parent & toddler groups in libraries, church halls, playgroups, one-o-clock clubs, sports centres are not unimportant or laughable.
They are mainly invisible to men, and to younger women, as is most of the shock of bringing up children and how that affects women's lives.
The Lols at Tala reflect the general disdain for the "lived experience" of mothers.
You have just spent 9 months building a whole new human being inside you. Your body is battered & changed for ever. You are off work. You are isolated. You may not have any local mum friends.
You are in charge of a baby. You have never done this before. You haven’t had a good nights sleep for months and won’t for years. Everyone has an opinion on what you are doing right and wrong.
Even getting out of the house feels momentously difficult.
Then two years later you are doing it again. This time with more experience, but more exhaustion, two sets of different needs to juggle. Baby and toddler. Buggy, juice, snacks, nappies, nap times, tantrums.
And you have become invisible. You had politics, you had a career, you had interests, you had a sex life. Now you have the daily needs of a completely dependent person, and your world has shrunk.
All of this has come as quite a shock. You weren't prepared for it.
So there is a local group where they sing songs and play with toys, give the toddler a biscuit and some squash.
There are other mums there. You feel less isolated. But you also feel intimidated. Are you doing this right? Are you being judged?
This is not the time and place for some ideologically driven Council worker to push gender identity on you and make you feel like a bigot or an outcast if you resist.
The fact that these men, and the young women that cheer them on think this is so laughable reflects society's disdain for mothers . This is why it is important that we can talk about women’s lives. Not “menstruators”, “uterus havers” and "pregnant people".
This is what it means to say woman is not a feeling, or costume. It is a whole life of experience of being female.
This is why the hub of the resistance is on Mumsnet
(because no, I don't buy the sneering argument that this is not important. Stuff about young children and mothers is not beneath consideration. That's feminism)
Library programmes are one of the first outside things parents engage in with their children. Education involves slowly growing independence. Parents protect their children, and institutions must work with parents. Don't trust institutions and people who lie or are ambiguous.
Bookstart Bear is shown as an adult protecting and nurturing a child. According to the brand he is male, though I guess most children will read this picture as a mama bear. Most babies and toddlers are primarily cared for by their mothers
On the left is what NatCen says and on the right is what the Guardian says
The previous question refereed to "the sex on their birth certificate not "whether a person had a broader right to change gender"
How did the Guardian get this so wrong... it seems it skipped ahead to the next bit of the @natcen@whatukthinks report where John Curtice speculates on what people *may* think.
Why do that ? Why not just report on the Qs asked?
Report says "we should be aware that there is apparently still some potential for disagreement about what should be done about the rights & recognition of transgender people"
More succinctly: there is wide disagreement!
(NatCen is where Nancy Kelly worked before Stonewall btw)
Michael Biggs' article in a peer reviewed journal on how the Dutch protocol went from experiment to adoption, without attention to evidence, is devastating.
The history shows:
- a cohort of children who likely would have grown up gay
-disregard for their chance of love and family
- focus on appearance
- lack of follow ups
- media & lobby group driven demand
- erosion of safeguards
Again and again.
Physicians have sold vulnerable children and their parents an impossible dream, based on incredibly weak foundations (and homophobia).
You would get a different answer in a set of Qs about poverty "which things can't you afford/access?" (Rent, energy bills, childcare holiday, transport, dentist etc ) or issues about period problems (pain, endometriosis, lack of toilet breaks)