I disagree with the suggestion @elonmusk made (see my reply to him below) but I REALLY dislike the pile-on. He's a good faith actor, and the world needs good faith actors with clout who want to solve the biggest problem facing the world, even if they're wrong.
My reply:
"Won't happen. And there's no such thing as "neutral Ukraine", it's not possible. Read this:"
People frequently accuse me of being emotional about this issue. And it's true, I am extremely tired of arguing this with people who thought the "Dombass" was a drink you get at a bar until 6 months ago BUT, understandably, some people are allowing their outrage at Russia's...
...behaviour to get the better of them. No matter how awful the Russian atrocities, this will not end like WW2. The world has changed. In the nuclear era, there are countries which cannot be made to capitulate. So, like I said from day 1, this *will* end in negotiations whether
...we like it or not (and I don't!). So yes, the consequences of Russian aggression must be so severe as to deter any country which even thinks about doing something like this in the future. But, end of the day, it's still going to be a negotiation of some kind. And that means...
...talking with people you don't like and entertaining suggestions you don't like. Alas.
P.S. people always ask me what my solution to the issue is - I said it on Question Time back in early March (watch the first 4 mins). But it won't be possible until both sides are fed of fighting and they're currently not:
Text summary below:
My suggestion, and right now it would be impossible since neither side would agree, has been, from day 1, that Ukraine give Putin a bloody nose and then trade away things that don't matter to Ukr (Donbass, Crimea) for PERMANENT security, i.e. NATO or strong UN peacekeeping force.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I never get upset about people trolling me or even strawmanning. I am a public figure - it comes with the territory.
This is genuinely the first time someone has said something about me that's actually upset me. And from an "investigative journalist" as well. Disgusting.
It's becoming very clear what the flaws of the Truss regime are going to be.
In my view, a politician with strongly held principles who isn't easily swayed by public opinion is a good thing and what we need, especially in the world that's coming over the next decade but:
Whatever you think of the policies themselves, the PR is an absolute disaster.
Two examples:
1) You're elected to replace Boris Johnson who is widely seen by his own voters as soft on immigration. You, probably correctly, think that given that our economic model has been....
...based on cheap foreign labour for 20 years, this cannot be changed overnight and in fact some rules need to be loosened.
In that situation, you have got to be utterly devoid of any sense to simply come out and announce this as a standalone policy.
I have a lot of new followers after my translation of Putin's speech, many of whom appear confused about who I am and what I am about.
First of all, the fact that Putin makes some correct observations about the West does not mean that the overall message is even remotely true.
I am not going to write a whole thread debunking his endless lies. In my experience, everyone has already made their mind up so they'll happily believe that "Russia led the anti-colonial movement" without ever asking themselves how Russia went from a grand duchy to the biggest...
...country in the world. 🤣🤣🤣
The notion that the West "plundered Russia's riches" is the most hilarious thing ever. I was there in the 90s and it wasn't foreigners shooting each other for control of Russia's natural resource industries and it wasn't foreigners who ended up
I wish every single person in the West would listen to Putin's speech. Obviously, that won't happen so let me summarise as a professional translator for 10+ years. He states, as he has done from the outset, what his intentions and complaints are in the plainest terms possible.🧵
Setting aside his brief comments on the recent "referendums", he spends most of his speech discussing the West. His primary complaint isn't NATO expansion, which gets only a cursory mention. The West is greedy and seeks to enslave and colonise other nations, like Russia.
The West uses the power of finance and technology to enforce its will on other nations. To collect what he calls the "hegemon's tax". To this end the West destabilises countries, creates terrorist enclaves and most of all seeks to deprive other countries of sovereignty.