Hillary Davis Profile picture
Oct 4 20 tweets 9 min read
The mtg for #CCSD Supt Jara’s extension+raise is happening tomorrow a.m. at a work session. Contract amendments have happened at work sessions before, but practice and policy suggest that voting on a major contract amendment at a Wed a.m. work session is not the usual. 🧵1/20
.@lindacavazos13 says they would normally be voted on at a regular or special meeting 2/20
.@trusteeford says they’re supposed to happen at regular meetings 3/20
Both trustees have been vocal about this on and off Twitter- e.g., this report by @maddiewhiteTV fox5vegas.com/2022/10/04/ccs… 4/20
This is only my second year with CCSD so I went into Board archives to see more for myself, for context. Here’s a policy to support @trusteeford argument- GP-9: Meeting Planning
ccsd.net/trustees/pdf/g… 5/20
(see also GP-12: Types of Meetings for definition of “special” meeting) ccsd.net/trustees/pdf/g… 6/20
Summary of what’s to be considered tomorrow: a 3.5 year extension and $75k/year raise. lasvegassun.com/news/2022/oct/… 7/20
After media reports published yesterday, CCSD/@irenecepedaNV put out this statement. She references a Feb. 3, 2021 work session agenda item re: Jara’s contract, leading up to his first (current) extension 8/20
Trustees did not directly consider extending or changing the terms at that work session. It was a procedural vote to say the contract would not be automatically renewed, as it allowed for at the time, and substantive changes could be done at a separate meeting. 9/20
Jara’s first contract amendment/extension was later approved (4-3 vote) at the regular meeting on May 13, 2021. The only substantive change was extending it through Jan. 15, 2023. 10/20
Other contracts approved or amended in the last 15 years (as far back as the online archives go) that I could find: Jara original in ‘18; Skorkowsky in ‘16 and ‘13; Jones in ‘10; Rulffes in ‘10, ‘09 and ‘07. 11/20
Jara original, May 17, 2018 12/20
Skorkowsky extension, Feb. 25, 2016 13/20
Skorkowsky originals (permanent and interim), July 18, 2013 and April 11, 2013 14/20
Jones, Oct. 14, 2010 15/20
Rulffes extension, Aug. 4, 2010 16/20
Rulffes other amendments, Oct. 7, 2009 and Feb. 22, 2007 (note: Rulffes was appointed in 2006, which predates the BoardDocs archive) 17/20
7 of 9 were voted on at regular meetings, except for Rulffes in ‘09 (voluntary pay cut; special work session) and ‘10 (extension + voluntary pay cut; work session). Both of these were during the Great Recession. 18/20
So, yes, within the last 13 years, contracts have been amended at work sessions. But far more recently and often, they have been taken at regular meetings. 19/20
Longtimers: let me know of any other times superintendent contracts have been offered or extended, not just discussed. 20/20

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Hillary Davis

Hillary Davis Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @HillaryLVSun

Aug 15
I cleaned up my running list of licensed separations (of duplicates and misspellings) and can now say that CCSD lost at least 2,156 teachers (and other licensed employees, like nurses, social workers, therapists) during the 21-22 school year. 1/16 🧵
I expect this number isn’t settled – I use the separation lists attached to each trustee meeting agenda, and it can take a while for separations to end up on a list. On the list for the 8/11 meeting, there were dozens with an effective date of May. So with that in mind… 2/16
I’m going to focus on the stated reasons why. 103 out of 2,156 are because the teacher was explicitly “dissatisfied with (the) district.” That’s about 5% of all separations. 3/16 Image
Read 17 tweets
Jun 30
On 7/6 @CCSD_Trustees plan to discuss major proposed amendments to policy on public comment at board mtgs. Suggested changes incl emphasis on civility/decorum, consequences for disorderly conduct, limiting length of comments, and going from 2 general comment periods to 1. 🧵1/5
@CCSD_Trustees Here is the new section on decorum and general guidelines 2/5
Here are suggested consequences for disorderly conduct. Removal and/or trespassing 3/5
Read 5 tweets
Jun 29
After timeline presentation, @SuptJaraCCSD says it shows CCSD’s commitment to compliance, despite accusations that they’ve had no interest in state ordered compliance with a “complete overhaul” of the 5th largest district in the US, also in midst of a pandemic. 1/
CCSD is “working diligently to comply with the letter of the law,” Jara says. Adds that it was an unfunded mandate. 2/
Chief Strategy Ofc Kellie Kowal-Paul says NDOE hasn’t sent CCSD compliance concerns since 2018, when fmr NV Supt Steve Canavero notified fmr CCSD Supt. Pat Skorkowsky- I think ref this, but someone w more institutional knowledge, plz correct me. 3/ doe.nv.gov/uploadedFiles/…
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(