While @TheAtlantic's guest writers pen indulgent essays that insist a better pandemic is possible if only we gave up caring in exchange for unburdened frolicking, @edyong, the adult in the room, calls out entitled indifference for its murderous impact. 🧵 theatlantic.com/health/archive…
Despite a safety net w/holes drilled by racism & underfunding, @drlucymcbride, @ProfEmilyOster, @DrleanaWen & @MSmelkinsonPhD advocate abandoning mitigations to return to a pre-pandemic normal in which the US lost "~626,000 people more than expected [for] its size & resources."
Collectively, they dismantled an early embrace of collective responsibility and shared sacrifice arguing, absurdly, that no sacrifice was required.
Yong: "[I]ndividuals have to consider their contribution to everyone else’s risk alongside their own personal stakes."
Instead of protecting people from Covid, they took on the nonsense of protecting people from *fearing Covid* as if fear could be divorced from the dangers especially vulnerable people faced.
Yong: "[P]undits have mocked people ...for being irrational and overcautious..."
Because their wealth allowed them to control their risk, they ignored the many disabled, immune compromised, minority & low-income people who can't.
Yong: "Treating a pandemic as an individualist free-for-all ignores how difficult it is for many Americans to protect themselves."
To free themselves from social obligation, they reframed risk in terms of individual risk, never mind that infection was left to run wild.
Yong: The American ethos see, "people [as] responsible for their own well-being, ...Such ideals are disastrous when handling a pandemic..."
Of course, individual risk ignores the threat they might pose to others, which is to say, individual risk, in its staggering blindness, ignores the most basic fact of infectious disease: transmission.
Yong: "Each person’s choices inextricably affect their community ..."
The cheerleaders of indifference leave individuals alone, fighting for their lives in a world where unequal access to health care and systemic failures make that fight harder.
Yong: "By failing to address its social weaknesses, the U.S. accumulates more of them." See screenshot.
Yong: "Normal led to this. It is not too late to fashion a better normal."
All that stands between normal and better are the high-profile advocates of social murder.
End.
Thank you to @Janet_heise for correcting my frankly embarrassing error and with apologies to both the Ed Yong (@edyong209) who writes for The Atlantic, and the Ed Yong (@edyong) who doesn't. :)
.@ShiraDoronMD et al argue against universal masking in healthcare based on 2 claims: 1) transmission risk from HCWs w/out symptoms is low 2) vaccination is sufficienly protective against hospital-acquired infection.
These claims are both knowably, provably wrong.
@AnnalsofIM
🧵
To establish their first claim, that the risk of transmission from HCWs without symptoms is low, the authors cite two sources: a) Killingley and b) Tayyar.
But a) Killingley does NOT show presymptomatic transmission risk is small. What Killingley actually shows is that, what the authors pass off as "minimal presymptomatic shedding," is consistent with **44% of transmission occuring presymptomatically**.
In honor of @TracyBethHoeg’s new anti-mask propaganda/preprint, I compiled her Tweets on mask studies into a textbook I’m calling, “Confounders: A Matter of Convenience.” It’s an expose of Hoeg’s bad faith hypocrisy. 🧵
Here’s the title page with a table of contents.
CHAPTER I:
HOW TO PROTEST PRO-MASK STUDIES
It's easy! Just complain the conclusion doesn’t hold because the data is confounded! 1. Eg. The Boston Mask Study
The moral panic over school closures has left us with problems more intractable than they were pre-pandemic because now, to solve those problems, we first have to dispel lies. That school is a preventative to suicide is a reprehensible distortion, but it is not the only one. 🧵
There is the hysteria over how closures hurt minorities the most which obscures that, for minorities, school is the source of a problem: the school-to-prison pipeline. nytimes.com/2020/10/28/opi…
There is the hysteria that closures are causing obesity which obscures the problem of fatty, nutritionally bankrupt cafeteria food. nypost.com/2019/11/16/the…
Following a lead in @mehdirhasan's receipt-riddled expose, I looked into FL's deadly summers but in terms of excess deaths (Hasan uses C0VID deaths) in the 10 US states with the highest percentage of seniors. Tl;dr: DeSantis won't be using these stats on the campaign trail. 🧵
The long list of concerns downplayers coopted for the sake of opening schools and then quickly abandoned: learning loss that didn't carry over to C0VID related cognitive declines, newsinfo.inquirer.net/1639956/omicro…
Shenoy et al urge abandoning universal masking on the grounds masks have little benefit & some harm. Yesterday I showed they're wrong about benefits. Today I show they're wrong about harms. Their strongest evidence favors masks. The rest has little relation to their ambitions. 🧵
In making the case that masks harm, the authors use three sources.
In Cormier et al patients & providers rate their masked & unmasked encounters in terms of communication difficulties. Using scales from 1-5 (patients) or from 1-6 (providers) participants are asked about eg. listening effort, ability to connect, understand & recall.