While @TheAtlantic's guest writers pen indulgent essays that insist a better pandemic is possible if only we gave up caring in exchange for unburdened frolicking, @edyong, the adult in the room, calls out entitled indifference for its murderous impact. 🧵
theatlantic.com/health/archive…
Despite a safety net w/holes drilled by racism & underfunding, @drlucymcbride, @ProfEmilyOster, @DrleanaWen & @MSmelkinsonPhD advocate abandoning mitigations to return to a pre-pandemic normal in which the US lost "~626,000 people more than expected [for] its size & resources." Photos of Lucy McBride, Emily Oster, Leana Wen and Margery S
Collectively, they dismantled an early embrace of collective responsibility and shared sacrifice arguing, absurdly, that no sacrifice was required.
Yong: "[I]ndividuals have to consider their contribution to everyone else’s risk alongside their own personal stakes." Screenshot of Article by Emily Oster from The Atlantic. The
Instead of protecting people from Covid, they took on the nonsense of protecting people from *fearing Covid* as if fear could be divorced from the dangers especially vulnerable people faced.
Yong: "[P]undits have mocked people ...for being irrational and overcautious..." Screenshot of Lucy McBride's TV appearance on "Reliable
Because their wealth allowed them to control their risk, they ignored the many disabled, immune compromised, minority & low-income people who can't.
Yong: "Treating a pandemic as an individualist free-for-all ignores how difficult it is for many Americans to protect themselves." Screenshot from an article. The title is: "Leana Wen Ac
To free themselves from social obligation, they reframed risk in terms of individual risk, never mind that infection was left to run wild.
Yong: The American ethos see, "people [as] responsible for their own well-being, ...Such ideals are disastrous when handling a pandemic..." Screenshot of web search results. The result is from the Was
Of course, individual risk ignores the threat they might pose to others, which is to say, individual risk, in its staggering blindness, ignores the most basic fact of infectious disease: transmission.
Yong: "Each person’s choices inextricably affect their community ..." Screenshot of NYT article in which Oster is featured saying,
The cheerleaders of indifference leave individuals alone, fighting for their lives in a world where unequal access to health care and systemic failures make that fight harder.
Yong: "By failing to address its social weaknesses, the U.S. accumulates more of them." See screenshot. Screenshot from Yong's article. It reads, "An estimated
Yong: "Normal led to this. It is not too late to fashion a better normal."
All that stands between normal and better are the high-profile advocates of social murder.
End. Screenshot of Wikipedia's entry on Social Murder. It reads,
Thank you to @Janet_heise for correcting my frankly embarrassing error and with apologies to both the Ed Yong (@edyong209) who writes for The Atlantic, and the Ed Yong (@edyong) who doesn't. :)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Loretta Torrago

Loretta Torrago Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Loretta_Torrago

Aug 28
The spectacular backfiring of "The Urgency of Normal". "The U.S. needs people to take this vaccine because it has nothing else. But its residents are unlikely to take it, because they’re not doing anything else." 🧵theatlantic.com/health/archive…
As @asosin says, there’s an “increasing incoherence in our response”. Some of it is, as she puts it, our “Field of Dreams” approach in which "we have the tools” but no money for implementation.
Since federal money is, for some, the only means of access “the boosters are going to be concentrated in the places that have been the least impacted by the pandemic”.
Read 5 tweets
Aug 16
Anti-school closure articles make 2 declarations:
1. School closed! Learning was lost!
* That assumes association = causation.
2. Test scores fell! Learning was lost!
* That assumes 2021 & 2019 are comparable.
Anti-closure articles lack 2 things:
1 Arguments & 2 The pandemic🧵🧵 A picture of 4 headlines fr...
First, to clarify: LL isn't loss, it's slower growth. But LL has come to mean: lower scores as measured by standardized testing.
So be it.
edpolicyinca.org/newsroom/covid… Graph with two lines extend...
I.ELEVEN Reasons Why Lower 2021 scores are not
EVIDENCE of LL

Scores *were* lower. One study revealed “a learning loss of about 3 percentile points or 0.08 standard deviations”.
pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pn… Same graph with the steep u...
Read 30 tweets
Jul 17
Dr. Paul Holtom saying his hospital "is not in crisis" is making the minimizer rounds. For perspective, he says other things like this gem: "I'm so tired of being worried about Covid week after week.." This is a joke because he's obviously not worried. 🧵
Also not worried is CMO Brad Spellberg who tells us, “Our Covid situation is the same.. it’s going up a little bit ..” Which makes me wonder: Does "the same" mean "is going up"? (Of note: the y-axis seems to be doing some heavy lifting keeping increases to "a little bit"). Image
Spellberg: We’re not seeing pneumonia; they’re not being intubated… What we see are electrolyte imbalances or someone who had autoimmune attack of the nerves. Could that have been related to Covid?
Me: I wonder why he asks but doesn't answer. Image
Read 16 tweets
Jun 4
Remember when the Brown University economist, amongst others, worried about kids going hungry if schools didn't reopen? I do. It was June 3, 2020. Interesting, she's not very vocal about it now. Are any of them? 🧵
theguardian.com/environment/20…
Without school meals kids will go hungry worried @ProfEmilyOster. Image
Vulnerable kids need in-person school for food. @drlucymcbride expresses concern. Image
Read 9 tweets
Jun 3
You can tell someone thinks Long Covid in kids is no big deal by how they describe the risk. If SIDS had a 2% risk, no one would call that small. So our first clue @ProfEmilyOster is downplaying is she describes the 2% risk of long-term symptoms in kids as “extremely small”. 🧵 A photo of Emily Oster with a screenshot of the title and su
Not that the self-proclaimed lover of data actually gives her readers the 2% figure so they can make their own judgements. For the actual numbers, you have to read the linked article where you might be surprised to find that Oster considers a 2% risk to be "extremely small".
And though the authors of the article say they were limited by a “lack of information on symptom severity”, Oster helps herself to describing LC's symptoms in kids as “mild”’. If you want to know what the symptoms are though, you have to read the article. Oster isn't telling.
Read 22 tweets
Jun 1
If you can't see the forest for the trees, you don't get to call a tree a forest. Yet @TracyBethHoeg, finding case rates equal in masked vs. unmasked communities during week 6 of her study, forgets weeks 1-5 and claims masks make no difference at all.🧵
papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf…
Hoeg’s study uses data from a CDC study of pediatric case rates which found these are lower in communities where schools had mask mandates. cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/7…
Hoeg expands the two week post-school opening the CDC study uses to 6 weeks. She says her study, unlike the CDC’s, finds “no association between mask requirements and pediatric cases”. Alt: Graph from Hoeg’s stud...
Read 25 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(