In talking about how cruelly @billyeichner, white, cis, rich, hot- or not-hot-enough-to-be-a-movie-star (depending on who's tweeting) demanded the queer community support his movie, a thing that is rarely mentioned is the rest of the cast.
When @nicholasstoller and @JuddApatow gave Billy the chance to write and star in a film, they were working from an established game plan Judd had used to help build the careers of @amyschumer@kumailn@Sethrogen and others. In making films like "Trainwreck" or "The Big Sick"...
newer comic voices were surrounded by established famous movie stars like Holly Hunter, Marissa Tomei, and Tilda Swinton. But Billy asked for his movie to not surround him with famous movie stars, but with out LGBTQ+ performers.
Because of discrimination, there aren't many LGBTQ+ actors with box office draw. In casting the romantic lead of the movie, he could have asked @ChrisEvans, but instead he went with a guy who came out in 2008 and got stuck making Hallmark movies for 20 years, @lukemac_BROS
and yes, Luke is white and masc and cis and hot, but the gay male community has spent so much time fetishizing these things that half of @Queerty's articles are just lists of torsos. Billy knew he had to draw attention to make $, and Luke is a gifted actor who draws attention.
And for the rest of the cast, Billy and Nick worked so hard to find veterans like @guillermodiazyo, who works constantly, but rarely gets to play gay, or stage actors like Becca Blackwell, who don't get many movies because LA has no idea what to do with bearded nonbinary d*kes
He found @alienreese who was just doing her Kamala impression online, and pulled her into the mix. He fell in love with @TsMadisonatl1 through her vines and helped continue her burgeoning acting career.
Billy took a risk convincing the straight guys and corporations to cast queer people without extensive resumes or B.O. draw, like me, in this movie. So when you pat yourself on the back for resisting the tokenizing, condescending marketing for the film...
Also acknowledge that @billyeichner held the door open for a lot of other, diverse queer people, and this movie doing poorly at the box office limits the opportunities which will be in our future.
Yes, streaming is a safer place for romantic comedies, and queer stories, but that's because streaming services get to decide how to allocate their resources for a diverse slate of programming. Getting lots of views is great...
But until we can show Hollywood that stories by us, about us are a way of directly generating money, we will not have the opportunities, or control over our own stories that straight cis people have always enjoyed.
#BrosMovie is still in theaters. Go, not because you're obliged to, not because @billyeichner was in @GQMagazine, not because if we don't, the homophobes win. Go because @EveLindley is the funniest fucking person in America.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Hey, in the past couple of years there have been a lot of people talking about Due Process. A lot of people seem to REALLY love due process, but do not seem to particularly know what Due Process is. Let's talk about it!
There are actually TWO due process clauses in the constitution. The Fifth Amendment, that repository of a BUNCH of powerful civil liberties says, in part, "No one shall... be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law." This applied only to the Fed govt.
After the Civil War, Congress realized states needed more regulation when it came to civil liberties, so in the Fourteenth Amendment, they included a Due Process clause "Nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty or property without due process of law."
When we mourn for people whose lives are "destroyed" by a social media kerfuffle around a recorded incident of racism, we often ignore how much the life that they enjoyed was one built around satisfaction of a number of class requirements.
You don't lose a job bagging groceries, working in a cafeteria, or doing construction for a racist tweet, and if you did, you could find another without many questions. What people lose are jobs based on class prerogatives: publicist, investment analyst, etc.
These class-based jobs have other requirements: going to the right schools, talking the right way, they prefer people from certain races, religions, social backgrounds, and relationship structures. It's always been possible to lose class based jobs based on violation of norms.
Claudia Kincaid from "The Mixed Up Files of Mrs. Basil E. Frankweiler" is an icon of 20th Century queer feminism: A Thread (with thanks to @rakeshsatyal and @ReeseW for bringing this up.)
There is no villain in "From The Mixed Up Files of Mrs. Basil E. Frankweiler" (hereafter MUF). Other, lesser works give you a great big bad with no moral ambiguity. Voldemort, White Witch, etc. The villain in MUF is existential dread, it's knowing how boring your life will be.
Claudia is not the chosen one. Claudia chooses herself. No owls, no wardrobes. Claudia, a girl on the precipice of sexualization, and the accompanying dehumanization, opts out. She refuses to live the life she has been assigned. She goes, not to a wilderness, but to culture.
It's very beautiful to see people in the gay community honoring and remembering Matthew Shepard on the 20th anniversary of his death, but I remember that around the time of his death another gay man, Billy Jack Gaither, was also brutally murdered.
Billy Jack was also hanging out at a straight bar in a small rural town, he was also lured away by a couple of guys, he was put in the trunk of a car, driven to a remote location, had his throat cut with an axe, then was burned to death because he was gay.
Even though the story was strikingly similar and happened less than three months after Matthew Shepard's death, the story didn't become part of the national consciousness, it didn't become part of the story that was being told about Matthew Shepard and violence against gay people