1. Want to completely delink this thread away from the ongoing scandal. Purely approaching it from lessons learnt, preventive & punitive measures in the future angle. Private entities should have space to formulate their own rules n regulations. Players can avoid or abide by them
2. Guidelines/regulations/rules on what can be considered acceptable proof for a) online and b) OTB cheating should be drawn. Without a clear yardstick, it is up to everyone's interpretation to reflect their bias.
3. Experts from the industry should be consulted and all possible means/methods of cheating OTB should be identified (sensors, Bluetooth, plastic devices etc) and preventive measures implemented, to begin with in all major events.
4. We have to understand those possible cheaters will not advertise it or leave blatant trails to be caught easily. The policing mechanism should be advanced and must evolve with technological advancements cheaters may employ.
5. A strong player/cheater will not use tech help extensively leaving trails all along the path. Help obtained once or twice in a game is sufficient and won't leave any trail for statisticians.
6. It is not a player's duty but the event organisers to ensure no high-tech cheating is possible in their events. Prevention is the key.
7. A player caught cheating in online prize money events should have clear consequences offline too. Exemplary punishment for online cheating should be the deterrent for OTB cheating. Age exemption from punitive measures for 1 time online cheating should be agreed upon.
8. A mechanism to receive complaints in confidence should be introduced. How to handle such complaints, evidence gathering mechanism, investigation methods, yardsticks to be compared to, and clearly laid out punishments should be introduced.
9. This is an opportunity to lay down clearly defined rules and regulations which will be just for all. Currently, if a player(s) suspects another of cheating, the player is expected to do the police work of gathering evidence.
10. Confidentiality of players' identities involved in the complaint (both parties) should be maintained till the investigation is complete. END
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Got a message from a parent: A child new to chess got to 800+ USCF. Parents noticed the child making blunders in a few games. Suggested child to slow down, since then lost 9/10 games, started losing on time for the first time.
Current diagnosis by parents: Overthinking, not playing good moves as before. Parent query: What should we do?. This is a very typical approach by many parents. Pardon the long reply:
1. Just because as parents we support our children to take up any activity is no guarantee the child will excel in it. The child should be interested in it, have reasonable talent, should invest some time to get better. Child driven approach better than parent-driven approach
1. A coaches' role:
1. Setting a goal based on students ability
2. Cultivate the passion for chess in general and towards learning through struggle in particular
3. Make the students aware that a lot needs to be learnt and we should start now!
4. Remove fear of results especially losing games
5. Teach child not to play to satisfy others expectations or to fear others criticisms when results not favourable 6. Teaching student that learning more & becoming stronger in the process is the only way to ensure good results
7. Teach students to handle temporary setbacks
8. Teach students the value of hard work
9. Making the student understand that simply Knowing is not doing
10. We should play for experimenting, learning, to know about ourselves
11. How to handle time-related issues
Was discussing the effect of lock down on my chess students. Suggested to them to make a list to get a better idea about themselves: 1. Which openings you are currently playing with white and black? Make a list 2. Identify the openings/variations with bad results, be specific
3. Identify the openings coming often in your tournament games. For 2 & 3, prepare alternative lines/surprises. 4. Make a list of areas where you feel you are weak/you don't like/you avoid, in your tournament games & in home preparation (Endings, Closed, complex positions etc.)
5. Make a list of non-chess related problem areas like, poor concentration, low confidence, time trouble, laziness, don't know what to prepare, no time for chess, handling losses etc. 6. Make a list of areas you want to learn in next 3 months. Priority areas in next 1 month.
Can you guess the fee that was paid per day for being Coach of Indian Chess team for official events like Olympiad, World Team Championship, Asian team Championships? No one would believe it. Things got slightly better eventually, though nowhere near what it should be.
The Indian system looks down upon Indian coaches for most part. Foreign coaches mean 5 to 10 times more fee will be paid, forget about competency of coaches or results produced for the country. Slave mentality due to centuries under colonialism still prevalent among many still.
2 decades ago, only officials from State federations where sent as coaches along with Indian contingent. More of a political appointment. Slowly things changed for better. Former players, Indian coaches started accompanying our teams but decent pay was almost non existent.
1. As most nations go into Corona Virus related lockdown, this is a good time for chess players to take a fresh, deep look at their training methods, priorities in Chess. Most are likely to be working on making changes to their opening repertoire.
2. For opening related changes, order of priority could be: a) openings/variations (O/V) that occur often in tournaments b) O/V where we have bad results c) O/V we have neglected or not worked as intensely in recent past d) O/V where we have less over the board experience
3. When we build opening repertoire its not necessary we throw to dustbin, lines we were playing earlier, once we have learnt something new. Mix old & current openings n play. Adding more arsenal into repertoire is preferable, it should broaden, not go from 1 narrow to another
1. Regarding solving puzzles/studies to improve calculation, one common question we often get in our mind is, how much time we need to take to solve one puzzle? There are 2 school of thoughts on this as far I have come across:
2. 1. Give yourself a set amount of time, if you dont get answer in this time, either see the solution or move to next one and
3. 2. my personal view, time does not matter initially, while you are mastering the process of improving your calculation skills. Get the solution right at any cost before you move to the next position irrespective of time, energy, effort involved.