Some reflections on my first month teaching destreamed #ENG1D1@GLRobertsCVI. After some intro activities, we’ve been doing work with information text structures in and will be doing some how-to writing. Here’s our sequence of learning so far. 1/
We started with some collaborative work sorting some sentences/short paragraphs by structure. You can find the resource we used (for free) at the bottom of this site here: teachingwithamountainview.com/informational-… 2/
After, students watched this video and filled in this graphic organizer to consolidate the learning they had done in their small groups. I got this template from the amazing @mslongpre!
We did some contextual vocab and syllabication work with the word “appropriation,” and then started to think about how to notice these structures in our reading using this article. 4/ docs.google.com/document/d/1Nn…
*I forgot to add that we did a day of web site analysis in connection with appropriation. This was a day of great discussion where I recorded observations of using oral communication to make sense of texts. docs.google.com/presentation/d…
I also started to build in and model using annotation for personal reactions, connections and questions as we read. 5/
Students were given time to complete the stop points for the text features and apply the annotation strategy. When finished, they could choose to try another sort activity if they still weren’t confident with text structures, or move on to an independent article (3 choices). 6/
Students made it to different points in this process and I have enough assessment information for every student for our first criteria (not entered yet). We’ve touched on several skills, but this is what I’m evaluating in this unit (we’re only starting info reading skills) 7/
This assessment chart is new for me. I’ve used the #ThinkingClassroom approach that focusses on the complexity of the context the student is applying the skill within rather than a subjective judgement of how moderately or considerably or thoroughly they are doing it. /8
The other skills/tasks will be entered in their Record of Learning as evidence of the variety in their reading and skill application across contexts, but will not be assessed on the skill chart. Everyone learned something. No one was without something to do. 9/
Eventually, grades will be comprised of their unit marks based on the skills being evaluated, as well as the extent to which they have been learning across texts, writing purposes and variety in oral communication (overall expectations do emphasize “variety,” not mastery). 10/
We will move on to start to talk about writing and no one should feel “behind” because they didn’t get through every reading task. They used their time (well, mostly) and everyone finished / learned something. Later on when we spiral back, they can continue that learning. /11
My goal for these first few weeks in destreamed Grade 9 was to build routines and lay foundations. It has also been to ensure that tasks do not box students into “low” and “high” labels. Assessment should not be an event or a finite judgement. /12
If some students are consistently - day in, day out, struggling while others are excelling, it may be time to reflect on who our tasks are designed for. Productive struggle and excellence are both important - and all students should be flowing in and out of experiencing both. /13
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Moving to online teaching is a lot of work, not a pivot. Here’s a thread of tasks, mini units or sequences I’ve created for various Eng courses for use online. Please check for grade/level appropriateness. I hope I can make someone’s life a little easier. Please share. 1/11
First, a daily slide is helpful to lay out the agenda, as well as put all the links to all the docs or sites to be used. It’s not fancy, but it works. I do all 5 slides for the week in one deck. docs.google.com/presentation/d…
I wanted to capture my experience so far using a different way (for me) to instruct and assess writing. This is based on @SarahMZerwin ‘s process of weekly drafting. Also, it’s been awhile since I’ve done a ridiculously long thread 🤓🧵1
Our first writing draft was to connect and inspire. We used mentor texts by Indigenous writers in a few different forms as models for strong writing. Students chose their own topics that were important to them. 🧵2
These forms included personal essay and narrative, as well as fictional narrative. We determined must have text form characteristics, and did lessons on how to study a text for structure and writing craft using this personal essay from @Niigaanwewidamnews.umanitoba.ca/those-people-o… 🧵3
Response thread to @georgeotoole67 below. @mslangille1. Happy to have these conversations. I echo a lot from @senior_mrs@JasonHimsl’s responses. When we choose whole class texts we need to admit that choosing books that will appeal to the interests of 20-30 is not easy. 1/18
Consider the difference between interest and relevance. We can ask, what is happening in the world that our students live in today? What matters to them today? 2/18
Whose voices are heard and, more importantly, whose voices are trying to be heard? As English teachers we need to give space to the latter. In some cases, there might be themes we still feel are important, but we can breathe new life into them by introducing new voices. 3/18