Neil Abrams Profile picture
Oct 5 18 tweets 7 min read
I hesitate to call it a “mask-off moment” since, to have a mask-off moment, you need to actually wear one in the first place. But the tweet below is revealing of a fundamental truth about the man: @MaxBlumehthal—I shit you not—is an imperialist shill. A thread.
It’s despicable, albeit predictable, for @MaxBlumenthal to pretend that last Friday’s staged annexation “referendums” in Zaporizhzhia, Kherson, Donetsk & Luhansk were somehow free and fair. But the “Novorossiya” line takes Blumenthal’s nihilistic depravity to another level.
Let’s start with the preposterous notion that 87% or more of these regions would ever vote to join Russia. Do you know what % of their respective populations is actually made up of ethnic Russians?
Here’s the breakdown from the latest available census:

Luhansk: 39%
Donetsk: 38%
Zaporizhzhia: 25%
Kherson: 14%
Not that ethnic Russians in Ukraine have ever been all that enthusiastic about getting annexed by Russia. Below are opinion polls from 2014 and 2022. Note how much lower the % of people expressing support for union is than the actual % of ethnic Russians living in each region.
(The 2022 poll shows results not by individual oblast but by W, C, S, and E Ukraine. Zaporizhzhia & Kherson are 2 of 5 oblasts in southern Ukr while Donetsk & Luhansk are 2 of 3 in eastern Ukr.)

2014 poll: kiis.com.ua/?lang=eng&cat=…

2022 poll: kiis.com.ua/?lang=eng&cat=…
Want to know how “referenda” actually work under Russian occupation? Phone intercepts between Donetsk warlords and their Kremlin masters from 2014 show the latter picking a random number out of thin air to use as the “result” of a referendum that hadn’t happened yet.
So, no, @MaxBlumenthal, these “referenda” that were just held in the four Ukrainian regions Russia is pretending to annex were themselves pretend-farces that could never be real given the entirely understandable hostility of local residents to the prospect of joining Russia.
But @MaxBlumenthal’s blind acceptance of the “referendum” results isn’t even the most revealing part of his tweet; it’s his use of the term “Novorossiya” to refer to the regions of southern and eastern Ukraine Russia is annexing. Here’s why:
“Novorossiya” isn’t an actual thing—at least not since the days of the Tsarist empire, when it referred to an administrative unit carved out of modern-day Ukraine and Russia that had been annexed in the mid-18th century by Catherine the Great.
When the Tsarist empire ceased to exist, so did Novorossiya. But after the Soviet collapse, far-right Russian nationalists salty over losing their precious empire revived the term and used it to refer to swathes of now-independent Ukraine that they felt should be part of Russia.
In 2014, when Putin occupied Crimea and launched his stealth invasion of eastern Ukraine, dispatching Russian Nazi fighters (yes, really) and eventually Russian troops to take over parts of the country, he revived the term “Novorossiya” to legitimize his new imperial project.
The whole project was abandoned pretty quickly after the Kremlin realized there was no appetite whatsoever for separation from Ukraine outside of the Donbas (and was a minority allegiance even there—see above). Naturally, however, he’s brought it back it for the 2022 invasion.
I cannot emphasize enough just how fake this concept of “Novorossiya.” Aside from weird, esoteric Russian nationalists, nobody in eastern Ukraine had even heard of, much less identified with, the idea until the Kremlin started promoting it in 2014. theatlantic.com/international/…
And yet here is @MaxBlumenthal, a guy who revels in smearing others as imperialists, peddling the Kremlin’s bullshit about “Novorossiya” as a means of sugarcoating Putin’s nakedly imperialistic project to crush and dismember a neighboring country.
So next time you see @MaxBlumenthal call someone *else* an apologist for empire, just remember that apologizing for empire is his very reason for existing. This is not a guy with actual principles. He’s just a nihilist hawking imperialist propaganda for money and clout. /end

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Neil Abrams

Neil Abrams Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @neil_abrams

Sep 23
According to tankies, the 2014 Euromaidan revolution, in which Ukrainians rose up and ousted kleptocratic dictator Viktor Yanukovych, was a “coup” by the U.S. acting in cahoots with Ukrainian Nazis. Was it?

Short answer: No

Long answer: Also, no.

Let’s dig in.
This thread, on the Euromaidan, is the first of three debunking tankie claims about Ukraine. The next two, respectively, will address the Donbas “rebellion” of 2014-21, which was actually a covert Russian invasion, and the far-right’s influence in post-Maidan Ukraine.
The tankie narrative about the Euromaidan actually consists of three separate assertions: (1) that it was a “coup, (2) that it was engineered by the U.S., and (3) that it was carried out by the Ukrainian far-right. We will consider each in due course.
Read 81 tweets
Sep 16
I think this guy is arguing in good faith. But to believe that depriving Ukraine of weapons constitutes an “anti-imperialist” stance requires also believing Russia’s invasion *isn’t* imperialist. That, in turn, requires believing a number of things that are untenable IMO.
The notion that opposing arms transfers to Ukraine is anti-imperialist hinges on the view that Russia only invaded because it was provoked by a (supposedly) imperialist NATO alliance. But consider the things you’d have to accept in order to think that:
It requires believing there are legitimate reasons why Putin barely raised a fuss over Sweden and Finland’s accession to NATO yet viewed the prospect of *Ukraine* joining NATO as so real and so dire that it necessitated a full-scale invasion.
Read 16 tweets
May 23
⬇️ Summary of Germany’s new finding that entire detachments of Russian Nazis are fighting in Ukraine, as they were during the earlier Donbas rebellion.

Turns out the tankies clutching their pearls over Azov Nazis are—stunningly—acting in bad faith.

themoscowtimes.com/2022/05/23/rus…
For those interested, here’s more on the various Nazis Putin’s regime literally shipped to Ukraine in 2014 to lead the rebellion in Donetsk and Luhansk.

interpretermag.com/russia-this-we…
Note: The reason Russia had to send these guys in the first place in 2014 was that local support was not remotely adequate to initiate or sustain an insurgency. Without Russia’s backing and day-to-day management, there would have been no separatist rebellion from 2014-22.
Read 10 tweets
Apr 11
Folks, @TheGrayzone’s back with another flagrantly dishonest article claiming that Russian atrocities—this time in Mariupol and Bucha—were false-flags by Ukraine. Their latest journalistic farce further exposes them as purveyors of unvarnished propaganda. Let’s dig in.
@THEGRAYZONE The author of the piece is @KitKlarenberg, a former contributor to Sputnik News, a Kremlin-propaganda outlet. You may remember Sputnik from such classics as “Obama & Hillary created ISIS!,” “Covid is an Anglo-Saxon plot!” and “Democrats probably killed Seth Rich!”
Read 78 tweets
Mar 22
OK, so @MaxBlumenthal of @TheGrayzoneNews recently published an article claiming that Russia’s bombing of a Mariupol theater was actually a false-flag operation carried out by Ukraine’s Azov Battalion. Reader, this is one dishonest article, and I’m about to show you why. Thread:
@MaxBlumenthal @TheGrayzoneNews The bombing occurred a week ago. Locals, in an attempt to dissuade Russia from attacking it, had written “children” on the ground outside in letters so big they could be seen from space satellites. But was it really a false-flag operation by Ukrainian forces? Let’s dig in.
@MaxBlumenthal @TheGrayzoneNews Before we get into it, though, here’s a link to Blumenthal’s piece for your reference: thegrayzone.com/2022/03/18/bom…
Read 89 tweets
Feb 2
If Dems did as Rs do and met every new GOP outrage with unified, relentless denunciation, the media would have no choice *but* to cover it. It would saturate the media narrative for days & put Rs on the defensive.

A running thread of missed opportunities:
Republicans understand the importance of coordinated, vigorous campaigns to shape the media narrative. Dems just don’t. So *of course* the media will tend to overlook GOP fascism, amplify GOP talking points, and criticize Dems over nonsense.
Politics is not just about policy. It’s also about winning the daily media narrative. Unless and until Dems figure this out and start projecting dominance, they’ll keep getting hosed in the messaging war and look impotent in the public mind.
Read 107 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(