I hesitate to call it a “mask-off moment” since, to have a mask-off moment, you need to actually wear one in the first place. But the tweet below is revealing of a fundamental truth about the man: @MaxBlumehthal—I shit you not—is an imperialist shill. A thread.
It’s despicable, albeit predictable, for @MaxBlumenthal to pretend that last Friday’s staged annexation “referendums” in Zaporizhzhia, Kherson, Donetsk & Luhansk were somehow free and fair. But the “Novorossiya” line takes Blumenthal’s nihilistic depravity to another level.
Let’s start with the preposterous notion that 87% or more of these regions would ever vote to join Russia. Do you know what % of their respective populations is actually made up of ethnic Russians?
Here’s the breakdown from the latest available census:
Not that ethnic Russians in Ukraine have ever been all that enthusiastic about getting annexed by Russia. Below are opinion polls from 2014 and 2022. Note how much lower the % of people expressing support for union is than the actual % of ethnic Russians living in each region.
(The 2022 poll shows results not by individual oblast but by W, C, S, and E Ukraine. Zaporizhzhia & Kherson are 2 of 5 oblasts in southern Ukr while Donetsk & Luhansk are 2 of 3 in eastern Ukr.)
Want to know how “referenda” actually work under Russian occupation? Phone intercepts between Donetsk warlords and their Kremlin masters from 2014 show the latter picking a random number out of thin air to use as the “result” of a referendum that hadn’t happened yet.
So, no, @MaxBlumenthal, these “referenda” that were just held in the four Ukrainian regions Russia is pretending to annex were themselves pretend-farces that could never be real given the entirely understandable hostility of local residents to the prospect of joining Russia.
But @MaxBlumenthal’s blind acceptance of the “referendum” results isn’t even the most revealing part of his tweet; it’s his use of the term “Novorossiya” to refer to the regions of southern and eastern Ukraine Russia is annexing. Here’s why:
“Novorossiya” isn’t an actual thing—at least not since the days of the Tsarist empire, when it referred to an administrative unit carved out of modern-day Ukraine and Russia that had been annexed in the mid-18th century by Catherine the Great.
When the Tsarist empire ceased to exist, so did Novorossiya. But after the Soviet collapse, far-right Russian nationalists salty over losing their precious empire revived the term and used it to refer to swathes of now-independent Ukraine that they felt should be part of Russia.
In 2014, when Putin occupied Crimea and launched his stealth invasion of eastern Ukraine, dispatching Russian Nazi fighters (yes, really) and eventually Russian troops to take over parts of the country, he revived the term “Novorossiya” to legitimize his new imperial project.
The whole project was abandoned pretty quickly after the Kremlin realized there was no appetite whatsoever for separation from Ukraine outside of the Donbas (and was a minority allegiance even there—see above). Naturally, however, he’s brought it back it for the 2022 invasion.
I cannot emphasize enough just how fake this concept of “Novorossiya.” Aside from weird, esoteric Russian nationalists, nobody in eastern Ukraine had even heard of, much less identified with, the idea until the Kremlin started promoting it in 2014. theatlantic.com/international/…
And yet here is @MaxBlumenthal, a guy who revels in smearing others as imperialists, peddling the Kremlin’s bullshit about “Novorossiya” as a means of sugarcoating Putin’s nakedly imperialistic project to crush and dismember a neighboring country.
So next time you see @MaxBlumenthal call someone *else* an apologist for empire, just remember that apologizing for empire is his very reason for existing. This is not a guy with actual principles. He’s just a nihilist hawking imperialist propaganda for money and clout. /end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
As bad as things are now, we have not begun to see what Trump’s authoritarian regime is capable of. That’s because the traditional checks on presidential power have vanished. Before we consider how to get out of this, we must first understand how we got here. 🧵
Last time, we examined the evidence that the U.S. has transitioned to a competitive authoritarian regime. Authoritarianism is not a threat on the horizon; it is already here. This changes everything in terms of how Trump can be stopped.
Today, I identify the guardrails that once served to check the president’s abuse of power. I also show how each one of those guardrails had vanished by the time Trump was sworn in this year. The story begins long before he was on anyone’s political radar.
First of all, credit to @ItsArtoir for publishing the emails above.
@ItsArtoir The context: Hacked emails show that @wyattreed13, “managing editor” of The Grayzone News (whatever the hell that means), accepted monthly payments from PressTV, an Iranian state-run outlet known for hosting forced-confessions of dissidents right before their executions.
Lost amidst the interminable calls for “peace” is that an agreement to end the war is likely impossible. Neither the fervent wishcasting of Western pundits nor even, if they were so inclined, the very parties involved, can make it happen. In my latest, I explain why. 🧵
As always, you can find the link at the end of the thread or in my bio.
Writing articles and op-eds in support of a negotiated settlement has become a favorite pastime of the Western literati. Nary a day passes by without some pundit or academic, few of whom have any regional expertise, penning yet another iteration of this tired argument.
Want to see a progressive sound off about “spheres of influence” like they’re Otto von Bismarck? Beseech the great powers to divide up smaller nations over cigars and brandy? Parrot the inane rationales of a genocidal empire? It’s easy! Just bring up Ukraine.
My latest 🧵
Russia’s war on Ukraine has all the ingredients to turn a certain gullible progressive bad. It prompted global condemnation. The perpetrator’s a longtime enemy of the U.S. and a victim an ally. So it’s practically tailor-made to arouse the skepticism of contrarian leftists.
But understanding why requires one to enter into this peculiar mindset. That’s what I aim to do here. I dig into the foundational—and very weird—beliefs that end up causing many progressives to justify autocratic imperialism and indulge in silly atrocity-denial.
A lot of scholars are seemingly hellbent on damaging their reputations with ruinous advice on Ukraine and Russia. The past week alone has seen three open letters from this sorry genre, all of which, if carried out, would put real people’s lives in danger. Let’s take a look.🧵
As always, you can find the link at the end of this thread or in my bio.
The first two letters are calls for a negotiated settlement between Russia and Ukraine. One of them—I kid you not—was drafted by a guy who was suspended from the UK’s House of Lords for his undisclosed financial ties to the Kremlin.
“The sooner peace is negotiated the more lives will be saved…”
Anyone who says this—and it is stunning how many do—immediately discredits themselves. What on earth do these people think will happen to the millions of Ukrainians trapped under permanent Russian occupation??? 🧵
The vast majority of Ukrainians reject a territorial partition with Russia, and there is a very, very good reason for that. Far from having their lives saved, they will experience mass killing, filtration camps, deportations, arbitrary arrest, torture, and sexual violence.
And yet here these assholes go writing open letters to the Financial Times and pretending to have the best interests of Ukrainians in mind. Yet what they are proposing will consign Ukrainians to permanent violence under Russian occupation. I am so sick of this bullshit.