NEW: An appeals court granted DOJ’s bid to expedite its challenge to the appointment of a #SpecialMaster to review documents seized from Trump’s estate. DOJ argued speed was of the essence in its Trump criminal probe. Story w/ @ZoeTillmanbloomberg.com/news/articles/… via @bpolitics
The order Wednesday from the federal appeals court in Atlanta didn’t specify when it would hear arguments—or which judges would hear the case—but set a briefing schedule that wraps up on Nov. 17. Trump had argued against expediting the case & suggested oral arguments in January.
The appeals court previously rejected Trump's attempt to keep the DOJ from accessing about 100 documents bearing classification markings—some of them labeled top secret—that were seized from his home. DOJ argued the documents were crucial to to the criminal investigation
Meanwhile, the special master's review is continuing as part of the suit Trump filed after the search of his home before US District Judge Aileen Cannon, who last week extended the review deadline to Dec. 16. The delay was caused by trouble hiring a vendor bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
SCOOP: Donald Trump has said one reason the FBI found boxes of classified documents at Mar-a-Lago was that federal workers packed up the White House. Records obtained by Bloomberg's @JasonLeopold under a FOIA request tell a different story bloomberg.com/news/articles/… via @bpolitics
More than 100 pages of emails and shipping lists between White House and transition staff and the General Services Administration describe the minutiae of moving the Trump to Florida, down to how many rolls of bubble wrap, all within a plan signed by Chief of Staff Mark Meadows
The documents contradict remarks by Fox News’s Sean Hannity, Stephen Bannon’s Breitbart News and former Trump defense official Kash Patel, who have claimed that Trump isn't legally responsible for the documents because the GSA was in charge of filling boxes and shipping them
NEW: A writer who claims Donald Trump sexually assaulted her during an interview and a former saleswoman who says he groped her on an airplane are among the witnesses whose upcoming depositions in E. Jean Carroll's defamation suit he's wants to put on hold bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
Natasha Stoynoff, who says Trump attacked her at his Mar-a-Lago home when she was interviewing him for People in 2005, and Jessica Leeds, who says he groped her when they sat next to each other on a flight three decades ago, are both set to be deposed Oct. 13, court filings show
But Trump, who himself is set to be deposed Oct. 19 in the case, wants all the depositions called off until there’s a ruling on his motion to delay the suit, his lawyer said in a court filing in New York Tuesday. Beyond that, Trump is “ready and eager” to testify, the filing says
My latest: Donald Trump sued CNN for defamation, accusing the network of smearing him -- including with frequent comparisons to Adolf Hitler -- to undermine a potential run for re-election in 2024 bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
CNN has tainted Trump’s image by using “ever-more scandalous” labels to describe him, including “racist,” “Russian lackey,” and “insurrectionist,” culminating in false comparisons to the late Nazi leader, according to a suit filed in federal court in Fort Lauderdale, Florida
Trump, who wants $475 million in damages, says comparing him to “arguably the most heinous figure in modern history” is evidence that CNN had “actual malice” toward him—the required threshold for proving defamation against a public figure like an ex-president or reality TV star
ICYMI: A group of former prosecutors who served in GOP administrations told the 11th Circuit on Friday that Judge Cannon's #specialmaster ruling had given Trump special treatment. The group urged the court to let DOJ continue using seized classified records in its criminal probe
"A former President is entitled to no greater protection under the law than is any other citizen..[C]oncern for reputational harm is not a valid basis for enjoining a criminal investigation, especially one that is inexorably intertwined with a national security damage assessment"
The assessment was included in a proposed amicus brief by a half dozen former federal prosecutors and former New Jersey Gov. Christine Todd Whitman, who argue that Judge Cannon, a Trump appointee, is "affording greater protection to the plaintiff because he is a former president"
My latest: Donald Trump failed to meet a key filing deadline in his effort to stop the US from being removed as a defendant in his lawsuit accusing Hillary Clinton and various officials of conspired against him during the Russia probe bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
US District Judge Donald Middlebrooks on Friday said Trump failed to respond by Sept. 1 to a motion to dismiss filed by the US government, which is one of many defendants in the suit filed under a civil racketeering law. He extended the deadline to Sept. 6
“I caution plaintiff that if no response to the United States’ motion is timely filed by the extended deadline, then I will evaluate the merits of the United States’ motion without the benefit of counterargument,” the judge wrote
My latest: A federal judge declined to rule from the bench on Thursday after hearing arguments on Donald Trump’s request for a neutral third party to review documents seized from the former president’s home by FBI agents seeking classified records bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
The DOJ argued Trump had no right to such a review. “He is no longer the president,” said Jay Bratt, the DOJ’s counterintelligence chief. “And because he is no longer the president, he did not have the right to take those documents. He was unlawfully in possession of them.”
“What we’re talking about are presidential records in the hands of the former president of the United States,” said Trump attorney Christopher Kise. “This is not a case about some Department of Defense staffer stuffing papers in a bag and sneaking out in the middle of the night”