Jussi Halla-aho Profile picture
Oct 6 9 tweets 2 min read
1/9 Predicting is difficult. Especially predicting the future. I will make an attempt here and explain the assumptions on which the prediction is based.
2/9 Mr Putin is the kind of person who refuses to lose. His broader mentality and his current state of mind make it impossible for him to stop the war without a victory.
3/9 He very probably cannot achieve a military victory. His army is getting weaker morale-wise, material-wise and otherwise, whereas Ukraine is getting stronger all the time. He understands this and tries to win with mass and quantity and by attrition.
4/9 Russians are historically very good at dying en masse for their leaders. There are, however, cases where they have had enough, quit fighting a war they do not understand and turned against their masters. Think about 1917.

Is the army close to a breaking point? I do not know.
5/9 Will Mr Putin use a nuclear weapon? No. He loves (his own) life. He is very fond of himself. He knows using a nuke would have no military value for him but would have catastrophic consequences for his personal physical existence.
6/9 So, he will continue to throw conscripts, recruits and material into the grinder until a) he wins, b) he runs out of them, c) something happens to him.
7/9 He probably believes time is working for him, but I do not believe that is the case. The West, especially the US and the UK, has invested so much political capital in his defeat that his victory is no longer an option. They have more and better material than Mr Putin.
8/9 There are people in the Kremlin and the Russian military who understand that although Russia has already lost much, it can and will lose much more the longer the war continues. They also know that Mr Putin will not stop.
9/9 The only way out of this spiral to the bottom is to remove Mr Putin. I believe this is the most likely perspective. He will be sent to a "vacation", the Security Council will assume collective leadership. They will seek a cease-fire and some compromise.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jussi Halla-aho

Jussi Halla-aho Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Halla_aho

Oct 8
1/6 Pro-Kremlin commentators try to maintain optimism.

The damage to the bridge is not that serious.
It will be soon repaired.
The bridge itself is not that important.
The ferries can compensate.
Etc.
2/6 The mere knowledge that Ukraine can hit the bridge or any target in Crimea is fundamentally important. Russia has to allocate more and more of its already stretched resources to protect Crimea and hunt Ukrainian operators there.
3/6 The most important effect is that Russians - both military and civilian - cannot trust they can evacuate across the Kerch strait when the need arises. If and when Kherson falls, the peninsula will be the next target.
Read 6 tweets
Oct 1
1/5 For seven months, the West has treated Mr Putin with relative respect despite his being a genocidal tyrant, terrorist and war criminal. We talk to him, listen to him, pay attention to his speeches and declarations, and sit down with his cronies (like Mr Lavrov).
2/5 The general argument is that it is good to keep channels open and leave room for a diplomatic solution.

This has not worked very well. Mr Putin has been given every opportunity to back down, stop the war, negotiate, deescalate.

He will not do that.
3/5 On the other hand, by treating him in a "normal" manner we normalize his actions, especially in the eyes of his domestic audience. Scholz and Macron making phone calls to him increase his size and significance. International media reporting his speeches give them gravity.
Read 5 tweets
Sep 25
1/9 There is much speculation on whether and when Russia might use nuclear weapons. This threat should be taken seriously, many say.

Let us think about the risk and what "taking seriously" means.
2/9 The likelihood of Russia using nukes cannot be calculated. Russia has never used them. We do not know the circumstances under which Russia actually would use nukes - until it does.
3/9 One problem is that we do not know the consequences of Russia using nukes. Neither does Russia. Would it lead to a Ukrainian (and Western) capitulation? Or a massive Western conventional retaliation against who knows what targets? Or a nuclear retaliation.
Read 9 tweets
Sep 23
1/4 If Russia wanted to stop people from leaving the country, it could easily do that. Any idea why it does not?

If those who want to get out are genuinely anti-war, anti-mobilization or anti-regime, they would only cause trouble at home. It is better to get rid them.
2/4 If some dozens of thousands of troublemakers flee, there will still be millions of those who are too poor to travel or too phlegmatic to resist. They are more suitable as cannon-fodder than some educated big-city hipsters.
3/4 Those who go are most likely ok with the war itself, they just do not want to be personally part of it. Abroad, they are an asset for a Russia that is ever eager to protect its subjects wherever they are.
Read 4 tweets
Sep 23
1/7 Several Finnish MPs propose granting asylum to Russians who try to avoid mobilization by fleeing abroad.

hs.fi/politiikka/art…
2/7 This is probably no more than a knee-jerk reaction. For certain politicians, the default solution to any problem anywhere - be it famine, climate change, poverty, inequality, or war - is to bring people to Finland.

In this case, however, this is a particularly bad idea.
3/7 An overwhelming majority of Russians support the war - from the couch. A very small minority is willing to go to the front or send their family members. Let the Buryats and Kalmyks go!
Read 7 tweets
Sep 20
1/8 Since September 19, Finland is the only Schengen country bordering Russia that allows Russian tourists in, and the only border state that continues to issue tourist visas to Russian citizens.
2/8 New visas issued by Finland itself are not a big problem. Applying for them has been made difficult and expensive. A bigger question are the 100 000 or so current visa holders who come and go as they wish, and the people who have been issued visas by other member states.
3/8 Russians use the Helsinki airport to connect with tourist destinations. In the airport car park you can see long rows of expensive cars with Russian plates. I suspect they do not belong to Russian dissidents who are the main excuse for keeping the border open.
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(