Andrew Wood Profile picture
Oct 6 7 tweets 3 min read
As a result of the @AspireParty & @TH_Labour decision to support the businesses opposed to resident involvement in planning the Mayor is proposing instead "a developmental Masterplan for the Spitalfields and Banglatown area"
What is called a Supplementary Planning Document SPD
1/ Image
But SPD's cannot introduce new planning policies with the same weight as those now lost from the Neighbourhood Plan (which had material weight in the planning process from July 2021 to last night)
So the planning policies in the area are now less restrictive which means
2/
developers will find it even easier to get new applications approved
Plus the Mayors wording suggests the new Spitalfields & Banglatown SPD will be housing focussed
But a lot of the development in the area is commercial
But this is what the businesses wanted more freedom to
3/
redevelop Brick Lane for commercial use & also less affordable workspace in new developments
But I am not convinced that this is what residents actually wanted, they voted for the Neighbourhood Plan
@going4golds asked about this last night (the legal weight of the SPD) &
4/
was told the Mayor also wanted a refresh of the Local Plan (approved in January 2020, they should be reviewed every 5 years but can take years to do)
A new Local Plan could contain policies with the same weight as the now lost Neighbourhood Plan
But there is a window of
5/
opportunity for commercial developers now to maximise change in Brick Lane before new SPD written or new Local Plan
Which maybe is what Councillors actually wanted?
Who Brick Lane is for in planning terms is unclear (not for residents clearly) but what is its role?
The current
6/
Local Plan mainly talks about the economic role of Brick Lane
The Spitalfield Neighbourhood Plan had a vision & a set of policies for the area which took years to formulate working with stakeholders
Will the Mayor/Cllrs put the same amount of effort into its replacement?
7/ Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Andrew Wood

Andrew Wood Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Andrewwood17

Oct 7
March 2021 six current @TH_Labour Cllrs (then Cabinet members) & John Biggs vote to redesignate the Spitalfields Neighbourhood Planning Forum (2 other current Labour Cllrs also present)
Labour Cllrs on Wednesday including these 8 Cllrs vote to reject the Neighbourhood Plan
Why?
1 Image
The Labour speeches suggest that the Forum was divisive
BUT nobody said that last March: not Cllrs, not Council officers, not consultation responses
Council equalities impact assessment says no impact by the Forum on race & religion
2/ ImageImage
Council did a consultation on whether to redesignate the Forum
"No reasons have been provided in any of the consultation responses to suggest that the application should not be approved"
3/ Image
Read 12 tweets
Oct 6
Sorry I missed the fact that in the detail of the report the total number of businesses was reported as 812 of which 88 submitted valid votes
Business turnout 10.8% not 67% as quoted last night v
Resident turnout 13.46%
But as you can hear in the webcast it was the alleged
1/
higher business turnout that convinced Aspire Cllrs to ignore resident vote in favour of the business vote
Cllrs used the wrong information
How will @TowerHamletsNow now justify its reversal of the resident vote?
Listen from 2hr 33min in
towerhamlets.public-i.tv/core/portal/we…
2/
Council may try and add numbers this way
298 residents voted Yes
18 business voted Yes
= 316
252 residents voted No
70 businesses voted No
= 322 but that includes numerous illegal votes + 48 votes from a single building
Do they really want to justify their decision this way?
3/
Read 4 tweets
Oct 6
Last night Labour & Aspire Councillors voted against the Spitalfields Neighbourhood Plan
They chose to support a flawed business vote over the vote of residents
They did so based on a Council report that was misleading on a key fact & missing essential decision-making info.
1/
The claim made last night was that the business turnout of 66.67% was much higher than the resident turnout of 13.46%
And the 80% No vote from businesses was much higher than the resident Yes 54% vote
= support business
But the business turnout calculation was incorrect
2/
A reminder that in the Spitalfields Neighbourhood Plan referendum last October both businesses and residents living in the Forum area got to vote
Inevitably not everybody votes but elections are decided by those who vote
But last October residents voted Yes and business No
3/
Read 14 tweets
Oct 5
🧵about an attack on democracy in Tower Hamlets, the future of Brick Lane & whether Councillors will support residents or business tonight
Last October residents in a referendum voted Yes to approve Spitalfields Neighbourhood Plan
But business voted No
Cllrs tonight will have
1/
to decide whether to support:
business No vote
or the
resident Yes vote
See Item 10.1 the report for Councillors
democracy.towerhamlets.gov.uk/ieListDocument…
BUT this report misses out several key facts (once again demonstrating that Council officers do not like this subject)
2/
The @TowerHamletsNow report does not mention that there is an active Police investigation into the business No vote, nor that 49.5% of the business vote came from a single building, nor that the anti-Neighourhood Plan campaign broke several electoral rules in the referendum
3/
Read 25 tweets
Sep 29
London Marathon this Sunday 2nd October - avoid traveling by road that day
The main London Marathon which normally runs in April has been pushed back to this Sunday
It is one of the great events in the area, and is worth watching in person if you have never seen it but it
1/
will have a major impact on transport and roads from 4am/8am to 12am/8.30pm depending on where you are (no buses after 7.30am on the island for example)
A word of warning, the maps of road closures may not be accurate based on the one time I tested them
2/
I would avoid all road-based travel that day, if you need to use your car Sunday, either leave very early and return late or park your car elsewhere
More information here
tcslondonmarathon.com/the-event/road…
3/
Read 4 tweets
Sep 16
Some advice after 11 hours queuing if you want to see the Queen lying in state
- it’s cold
- there are toilets
- it’s long from 6.15am to 5.45pm for me - 2 hours longer then indicated
- it’s worth it
- no liquids/gels/sweets allowed inside
- you can get food on the way as
1/ Image
lots of stalls/coffee shops on the route (if open)
The wind along the river + lack of sunlight makes it much colder then you think from weather forecast
- Children were in the queue & did ok, they can go ahead & rest
- there are a few places you can sit down on the way
2/ Image
No big bags allowed (but there is a bag drop 4 hours from end)
It was magnificent but wear comfortable shoes/socks/clothes to enjoy it
Hopefully we won’t be doing this again for many decades so it is a sight worth seeing in my opinion & to say thank you to Her Majesty
3/ Image
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(