It's always a great day to not buy used Twitter accounts from shady websites, and this batch of merchandise being sold by "VIP STORE" on accs-market(dot)com is particularly worthless. #FridayFail
Although some of the accounts being sold have impressive numbers of followers (@nft_projects_s has just over 100 thousand), almost all of these followers are empty accounts created in September or October 2022.
The empty accounts following the for-sale accounts are part a fake follower network associated with shady follower sales site sohsh(dot)com, described in more detail here:
The accounts being sold by "VIP STORE" were renamed sometime between May 2020 and today. (The source for the previous names is a dataset of older account profiles downloaded between March and May 2020, described here:
Meet @gracessnow1 (permanent ID 926799990), allegedly an anti-Trump Account Manager from Washington, USA. At least three things are not as they seem, however.
First, a quick reverse image search reveals that @gracessnow1's profile photo also appears on LinkedIn as the profile photo of an "Account Manager", but with a completely different name: "Alexandra Sanderson" rather than "Grace S Snow". The alleged employers also differ.
Second, most of @gracessnow1's followers are fake. The first 1000 of the account's 1076 followers are accounts with 0 tweets and 0 likes created in September 2022, and belong to a fake follower network associated with follower sales website sohsh(dot)com.
Meet @nftsmmpanel, a Twitter account created in August 2022 that sells likes, followers, and retweets via a shady website. Can we find some of its merchandise? (Spoiler: yup) #SundayAstroturf
Sohsh(dot)com, the website promoted by @nftsmmpanel, offers a variety of services (followers, likes, etc) on a variety of social media platforms, including Twitter, Telegram and Instagram. It also offers an API (applications programming interface) to automate purchases.
Unsurprisingly, @nftsmmpanel appears to have gotten high on its own supply. Almost all of its followers are accounts created in September 2022 with zero tweets and zero likes, presumably examples of the followers sold on its website.
Meet @SpartacusJustic, @Lakovos_Justice, and @ClarkOlsin, a trio of accounts with superheroesque profile pics and a penchant for tweeting conspiracy theories about vaccines (mostly, but not exclusively COVID vaccines).
One of the three accounts (@SpartacusJustic) has repeatedly gotten thousands of retweets on tweets containing various bogus claims about COVID vaccines causing mass death/illness and an alleged secret plot by Bill Gates to depopulate the planet.
The other two accounts (@ClarkOlsin and @Lakovos_Justice) post similar content, but have been silent since early June and have few followers. Some of @ClarkOlsin's videos have nevertheless racked up massive view counts due to being embedded in @SpartacusJustic's viral tweets.
How can we tell that @proogb's face is GAN-generated? There are a few tells, most obviously the flesh-colored patches on the glasses where the blue background should be.
(GAN = "generative adversarial network", the AI technique used by thispersondoesnotexist.com and similar tools)
Unmodified GAN-generated faces (at least, so far) have the telltale trait that the major facial features (especially eyes) are in the same location on every image. This becomes evident when one blends multiple GAN-generated faces together.
Meet @nftver (permanent ID 1472241100953899011), an NFT account with "DM for promo" in its biography and one of the least authentic-looking follower growth patterns in recorded history.
Almost all of @nftver's followers are part of an astroturf network consisting of 28580 accounts. These accounts all tweet via Twitter for Android; some also tweet via the Twitter Web App. Although the bulk follow behavior is new, the accounts were created over several years.
The accounts in this network follow the accounts they follow in blocks of thousands of accounts created on specific dates within specific date ranges. This results in the blocky/streaky artifacts seen in the follow order by creation date plots.
The Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights recently released a report on human rights abuses in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region (ohchr.org/sites/default/…). A spammy Twitter network is attacking the report with repetitive cartoons and hashtags.
This network consists of 48 similarly-named accounts created between June and September 2022. All have few or no followers, and all thus far have tweeted exclusively via the Twitter Web App, with most of their tweet activity occurring over the last five days.
Most of this network's tweets contain images (612 of 900 tweets, 68%). The tweets that lack images are mostly replies, usually criticism of the United Nations Xinjiang human rights report directed to official UN accounts.