Zahed Amanullah Profile picture
Oct 8, 2022 15 tweets 5 min read Read on X
The Kerch Strait bridge has been struck by an explosion.

Leaving aside the military implications to other experts (and plausible deniability for Ukraine), let’s look again at the structural engineering implications for this bridge and outcomes for the rest of the war (1/x)
When I reviewed the damage for the Antonovski bridge, I remarked that the Kerch Strait bridge would constitute a more difficult challenge. That challenge has been accepted (by… someone) and the result is as good as we could expect, even though the bridge is repairable IMO (2/x)
First, let’s look at the structure itself. The road section consists of simply supported prestressed girders supported by concrete piers. Unlike the box girders of the Antonovski bridge, these girders aren’t interconnected (i.e., loads aren’t transmitted from span to span) (3/x) Image
This highlights a key structural weakness… once a girder is dislodged from the supports, adjacent girders follow, leaving a clean break at the pier.

An attack from above, with energy dispersed by the road deck and piers absorbing compression would be insufficient (4/x)
An explosion from below, however, with the road deck absorbing the blast wave, would be sufficient to dislodge these connections. I believe this is what happened... if so, a brilliant strategic decision combining military and engineering expertise. (5/x)
Russia is claiming that the explosion was caused by a lorry explosion. Again, I believe a blast from a truck would be dissipated by the road deck, resulting in localised damage.

Look at how many HIMARS attacks it took to disable the Antonovski bridge. (6/x) Image
As for the multiple road deck spans that have collapsed, this is likely due to the primary span collapse pulling the adjacent spans down via the road deck. I believe the piers are still intact, which means the decks are repairable, but would take many months (7/x) Image
On to the rail bridge. This bridge is constructed from simply supported steel box girders on tall concrete piers.

Let’s talk about the differences between steel and concrete and why the rail bridge may have been designed this way (8/x) Image
Steel is ductile, which means that it can absorb energy through deformation without fracture.

Concrete (without steel reinforcement) is brittle, which means that when stressed, it can fail catastrophically and unpredictably.

The Antonovski bridge is now in this state. (9/x) Image
The explosion that likely disabled the road deck would have been unlikely to disable the rail bridge, due to the high placement. I believe this was by design.

Similarly, an explosion from above could be absorbed more easily by the steel.

That leaves one option… fire (10/x)
As we saw with the WTC attack on September 11th, it was fire that brought down the towers, not the impact of planes themselves. This required a long period of intense heat to degrade the steel to the point where collapse was inevitable (11/x) Image
The only way this could be replicated at Kerch was to have a fuel source to provide this long period of heat exposure. A rail car full of fuel tanks provided this opportunity, and much of what we saw on fire was fuel draping the bridge structure.

However… (12/x)
The fire appears out and the bridge still stands. If there is any deflection in the bridge, the steel will have lost a considerable amount of strength.

If it hasn’t reached that point (see graph above), it may be salvageable, but not for many months. (13/x) Image
Overall, this is as much as any military strategist or engineer could have hoped for if the intent was to disable the bridge for resupplying troops.

A road deck is still intact and the rail bridge could be operable in a few months.

Well played, whoever is responsible. (14/14)
ADDENDUM: It’s hard to calculate how steel on the rail bridge was impacted by fire, looking at photos from afar.

But there’s a clue… look at the steel railings and walkways that have wilted under the heat. A good sign the box girders are possibly damaged beyond repair. 🔥

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Zahed Amanullah

Zahed Amanullah Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @zahed

Jul 27, 2022
A structural engineer’s view (yes, I was one) of the Antonovski bridge damage and why it has put it out of commission for the rest of the war (1/x)
From the images I can see, this section consists of box girders, concrete elements designed to mimic steel girders over long distances. The holes you can see on the surface are bad enough… those distribute loads to vertical elements (2/x)
The concrete deck on top is primarily in a state of compression, which theoretically allows it to be repaired by professionals (i.e, not those repairing the bridge holes at Nova Kakhovka) (3/x)
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(