STARTING IN 3 MINUTES: Dan Crenshaw’s 2-day Youth Summit in downtown Houston, which will include appearances by Jordan Peterson, Gov. Abbott, Dennis Prager, rich Lowry of the Natl. Review and Babylon Bee CEO Seth Dillon.
Will be tweeting details below.
Outside the main hall:
Show starting. Crowd has filled in a bit more.
We begin with a film in which Crenshaw and others are ostensibly looking for BBQ. It’s mostly jokes about pronouns, safe spaces and at least one Austin jab.
Ronald Reagan is here.
Crenshaw is talking in front of a slideshow of Reagan while taking about taxes, the welfare state, juvenile delinquency, a society security system “built on a house of cards” (quoting Reagan) and other traditional conservative issues.
There is A LOT of Regan talk so far.
Crenshaw now calling for a "new Reagan revolution." He takes a jab at AOC and what he says is her lack of relevant knowledge/experience. But then says that you don't "fight fire with fire," IE other politicians with a lack of relevant experience/knowledge.
Some of the speech
Jordan B. Peterson is now zooming in from Finland to talk about the war on Western Civilization, Protestantism, the Priesthood of Believers and weaponized "identity."
He says Protestantism + liberalism "has given rise in part to these identity claims."
I'll upload the full clip later on his Priesthood of Believers portion.
Missed this earlier but Crenshaw came in on a Delorean — which is an interesting choice given the heavy focus so far on Reagan + this being a youth summit, and that (by my estimate) 90% of the attendees weren’t alive for Back to the Future.
An audience member just asked Peterson if its better to be a jack of all trades or a master of one.
Peterson: "It's better to be both."
As Jordan B Peterson hits minute 4 in response to this question, let’s take a look inside the literature at every seat:
Peterson now talking about “bloody social media” platforms and “narcissists/psychopaths” (who he says account for 3% of the population) who overrun social media; “and with no regulation whatsoever.”
He then says he has a problem with people who use social media for attention.
Peterson continues by calling for more regulations online, including in comment sections. (Which, unless I’m missing something, is an interesting take given that the Texas GOP is currently fighting precisely the opposite in court)
There is now a session on climate change
Outside, attendees being asked if “God had a voice in your classroom.”
Yays: 20
Nays: 19
Homeschooled: 9
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Happening now in Texas: Cindy Clemishire, whose disclosures led to the indictment of megachurch pastor Robert Morris, is testifying in favor of a bill that'd ban NDAs in settlements for sexual abuse lawsuits. #txlege
Rep. Jeff Leach: "You either stand with victims or you stand with the people who harmed them. There is no middle ground." #txlege
Rep. Mitch Little also sitting in on this committee, decrying the "soul murder" of clergy abuse. Little represented the family who sued The Village, a Dallas-area megachurch, after their daughter was abused by a church leader.
I’ve spent nearly a decade covering evangelicals and then far-right extremism. The overlap was always there but has drastically accelerated as of late — due in part to the view, prominent in Eva circles, that online is not real life or that the fringe will stay fringe.
I say this because I think that there is the potential for Evangelicals to see this steadily rising Nazi movement in their ranks and shirk it off as fringe. It is. But so was QAnon, election denialism, COVID conspiracies, etc
I’m not smart and don’t have an answer. But I can say with certainty: treating this as something that’ll dissipate with time will prove a fatal miscalculation. Platforms are already built and getting bigger. So are followings and comfort with saying quiet parts out loud.
Megan Basham is scheduled to speak in January to True Texas Project, the far-right group whose leaders sympathized with the El Paso WalMart gunman and just held a Christian nationalism conference that claimed Dems want to "rid the earth of the white race."
True Texas Project's recent conference included panels that defended Great Replacement Theory, claimed "forced multiculturalism" is a conspiracy to destroy white people, and encouraged attendees to embrace being called white nationalists or supremacists. texastribune.org/2024/06/12/tru…
Speakers included a longtime collaborator of prominent eugenicists/white nationalists such as Richard Spencer. The event was so extreme that two of the farthest right figures in Texas - Louie Gohmert and Don Huffines - both pulled out as speakers. texastribune.org/2024/06/13/tru…
🧵🧵In 2022, Elvie Kingston’s dementia took a turn for the worse. A doctor said the oil-rich conservative activist couldn’t manage a bank account or dress alone - but could sign legal docs removing her family's control of her health/finances.
Enter a Texas Supreme Court justice:
Since 2022, Texas Supreme Court Justice John Devine has overseen Kingston's trust. He claims they are basically family. Legal experts say he is clearly violating ethics rules that explicitly bar judges from such positions to avoid conflicts of interest + appearance of impropriety
Devine's wife, Nubia, is also Kingston's guardian - giving the couple wide control over her health, finances and life. The arrangement has been adamantly opposed by Kingston's family + some friends, who say she was once close to the Devines but had a massive falling out.
NEW: For two years, Texas Supreme Court Justice John Devine has controlled the trust of a woman with dementia — a violation of Texas' judicial ethics code, experts say. The woman's niece + three friends also allege that she wanted nothing to do with him. texastribune.org/2024/10/22/tex…
The concerns are the latest raised about Devine's ethics as a judge. In February, we reported that he did not recuse himself from a high-profile sex abuse lawsuit against Southern Baptist leader Paul Pressler despite their close ties.
In February, we obtained leaked audio in which Devine accused his colleagues on the all-GOP Supreme Court of being "brainwashed" by "Big Law," saying he worried they'd "sacrifice the Republic for the sake of the (legal) process." #txlege texastribune.org/2024/02/27/joh…
[1] To be clear: It is the most basic journalism ethics to not name abuse survivors without consent (barring extraordinary circumstances). There's not some carve out that says "ok well go for it since their name is buried in a court record or some blog ID'd them"...
[2] I've seen many people argue that, because the survivor was ID'd in a court record, it's fair game. Legally, sure. Ethically? Absolutely not. And this is not an area where there's any serious debate among serious journalists...
[3] Included under the "minimize harm" plank of the professional journalism code: "Recognize that legal access to information differs from an ethical justification to publish or broadcast"; and use "heightened sensitivity" for abuse victims.