Thread by @DograKnight

𝗠𝘂𝗰𝗵-𝗮𝘄𝗮𝗶𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗔𝗿𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗹𝗲!

Morethan two weeks has been passed and much awaited response regarding the confusion of birthday of Maharaja Hari Singh Bahadur is still to bring out. Today morning I got some messages that I should throw light atleast now as people were

waiting for truth. Following this lead, I am going to talk about my earlier claim that Maharaja Hari Singh Dogra was born on 13th of September rather than the popular belief of 23rd September.

Accepting it as the moral responsibility towards my tribe, I am presenting some of facts regarding the date with some of the authorised attatchments from the archives.

The first attachment is from "𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐌𝐚𝐝𝐫𝐚𝐬 𝐖𝐞𝐞𝐤𝐥𝐲 𝐌𝐚𝐢𝐥" of 25th September 1895 and the thing which is to be take into notice is that the Maharaja Hari Singh was too born in September 1895. When we went through it then we found something regarding birth of

Maharaja Hari Singh, it reads: "𝐑𝐚𝐣𝐚𝐡 𝐒𝐢𝐫 𝐀𝐦𝐚𝐫 𝐒𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐡 𝐨𝐟 𝐊𝐚𝐬𝐡𝐦𝐢𝐫 𝐡𝐚𝐝 𝐚 𝐬𝐨𝐧 𝐛𝐨𝐫𝐧 𝐨𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝟏𝟑𝐭𝐡 𝐢𝐧𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐧𝐭. 𝐍𝐨𝐧𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐫𝐞𝐞 𝐏𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐜𝐞𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐊𝐚𝐬𝐡𝐦𝐢𝐫 𝐡𝐚𝐝 𝐚𝐧𝐲 𝐬𝐨𝐧 𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐯𝐢𝐨𝐮𝐬

𝐭𝐨 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐛𝐢𝐫𝐭𝐡 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐜𝐡𝐢𝐥𝐝, 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐢𝐬, 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐞𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐞, 𝐨𝐟 𝐬𝐩𝐞𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐥 𝐢𝐦𝐩𝐨𝐫𝐭𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐫𝐨𝐲𝐚𝐥 𝐟𝐚𝐦𝐢𝐥𝐲. 𝐈𝐧 𝐊𝐚𝐬𝐡𝐦𝐢𝐫 𝐠𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐲 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐧𝐞𝐰𝐬 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐫𝐞𝐜𝐞𝐢𝐯𝐞𝐝 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡

𝐫𝐞𝐣𝐨𝐢𝐜𝐢𝐧𝐠."

In these above-quoted lines it is being clear that on 13 September, 1895, son to Rajah Amar Singh means Maharaja Hari Singh was born. Many intellectuals can challenge this by saying that there might be some printing error.

So, let's move to other sources of different years announcing the birthday ceremonies of Maharaja Hari Singh. I have two dozens of sources regarding this but here I will disclose only few of them and may reveal other soon.

I have informed earlier that His Majesty Maharaja Hari Singh Bahadur Dogra was born on September 13, 1895 corresponding to Navami (Krishna Paksha) of Ashvin Month, 5171 Dogra - Shăstri Samvat/ 1952 Bikram Samvat. When we examine the contemporary sources then a thing come into

notice that rather than the Gregorian Date, Maharaja Hari Singh used to celebrate his birthday every year on Ashvin Month's Navmi (Krishna Paksha). We can find this in attached attachments that in 1926, Maharaja 's Birthday was on 30 September; in 1927 it was on 19 September;

in 1931 it was on 5 October but started after 1:29 P.M. as Navmi started after 1:29 P.M.;

moreover in 1935 it was on 21 September.

Thus, everything is clear as like the pure water flowing through the stream that 23rd of September can't be considered as the birthdate of Maharaja by any means as if we go through the Gregorian calendar of 1895 then he was born on 13th September, whereas if we don't want to

consider it then the date would be corresponding to Ashvin Month 's Navmi in Krishna Paksha and date will change every year.

A question now arises that the time period of Maharaja Hari Singh is not thousands of year from now; so how this error took place and why historians as well as all the intellectuals carried the same error. Who was the first person to propagate it for first time and why nobody

questioned it? I have all the answers but will reply all on right time.

Explaining about the birthday celebration what Maharaja used to carry out; I want to say that there used to be the public holiday and the celebrations was carried out for weeks and amnesties as well as

charities were seen as important activities. The recreational tournaments whether it be Polo or Football were also organised. Birthday Pooja was one of the most important ritual which was followed and the shooting, slaughtering of animals as well as fishing was totally banned on

the day. Rice and sweets were distributed among the subjects.

Now, coming to 23rd of September; it is also an important date related to the Dogra Royal house as on this day Maharaja Partap Singh passed away in 1925 and Maharaja Hari Singh informally became ruler of the Jamboo

Kashmir wa Tibetaadhi Anek Desh as coronation ceremony took much later. If even after knowing all, I didn't have revealed all these facts then it would be like treachery to my people and someone else might have dig it out in future and if revealed by some non-dogra then the

the fingers would have raised towards all Dogras that they even don't know about this historical blunder and still asking for refinement of errors what's brought in history of Durgāradesa.

Now, it also became an important thing to note that how many Dogras especially those who consider themselves in the row of intellectuals are ready to accept the truth and promote the truth.

Jai Durgāradesa!

#D565 #Dogra #TrueHistory #Kaliterics

@threadreaderapp unroll