Anglo whiteness is particularly self-referential, unable to recognize the codes of other histories of whiteness. For example anglos read all latines as non-white.
1/
The xenophobia with which anglo whites try to racialize latine whites is real and harmful, but it is also real that white latines, whether in the US or farther south, have access to powerful, genocidal modes and histories of whiteness and settlerness.
2/
It's not a repeat of how the Irish & Italians became white, since the upper classes of Latin American countries are already white, some are full on settler states, etc. But the infamous reactionary tendencies of newly white Italians & Irish, for ex., might be a cautionary tale.
3
The updated version: identity politics have long ago degraded into representational politics, and white latines in the US are particularly situated to access many forms of white privilege while also being able to hoard or gatekeep resources that the liberal, charity-based
4/
responses to racism allow to trickle down to racialized people. They will be the chosen representatives for most racialized people, because the anglo whites who hold the most power feel the most comfortable with them (since they share most codes of whiteness).
5/
We can already see how Republicans and the Right are aggressively courting white latines to maintain majorities and avoid criticisms of racism, and many white latines subjected to xenophobia aggressively want their whiteness to be recognized.
6/
The shared code that will allow for this is ever more virulent racism and violence towards Black and Indigenous people.
What is the best way to head this off? I don't know. Let's be especially attentive to what our Black, Indigenous, mestizo, and migrant comrades are saying.
7/
Let's be more forceful in our rejection of representational politics (basically what folks today call identity politics though not in the original Combahee River Collective sense) and let's speak more openly about anti-Black racism and what it means to live in a settler state.
8/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The technology debate
Or why claiming to be pro- or anti-tech is nonsensical.
An anecdote: This wall has probably been standing here for close to 2000 years. 1/
Due to the forcible impoverishment and depopulation of the countryside carried out by the State with accelerating vigor in the 19th and 20th centuries, there were fewer hands and resources to maintain the wall. Over the decades, some stones fell out.
2/
The government now wants tourists to walk by this wall, so they paid to have it repaired. The company in charge disposed of resources and machinery that those who built and maintained the wall over the centuries could not have imagined.
3/
News flash: The lion is not the King of the Jungle.
1. Lions live in the savanna. If there is a lion in a jungle, he has probably taken a wrong turn. 2. Historically, jungles are hostile to absentee rulers. 3. Lions are not practitioners of hereditary monarchy.
a/
4. Lionesses have more influence in social decision-making than male lions. 5. There are no species in the jungle or savanna that swear fealty to lions, though sometimes particularly old and tired wildebeest will be seen to offer themselves up.
b/
6. Lions regularly get their asses handed to them in fights with healthy adult members of the species they prey on. 7. Eating someone is not an act of domination. Domination requires that the object of domination remain alive so that their behavior can change in accordance
c/
All but the most bigoted of people in the political mainstream would suddenly see things clearly if Western media occasionally surveyed and interviewed Israelis. The level of explicit racism against Palestinians surpasses what US whites would say publicly during segregation.
/
Antisemitism is a real problem, and the Israeli government is firmly on the side of antisemitism. They have long been political allies of rightwing fundamentalist Christian orgs in the US and the most antisemitic govts in Europe like Orban's Hungary.
/
Israeli arguments of self-defense can only be taken seriously if we accept the fundamental Israeli belief that Palestinian lives have no value, given roughly ten Palestinians have been killed, and mostly civilians, for every Israeli.
//
I want to make an apology to everyone for how I write. I've always expressed anger and love in my writing, but I've also cut out nearly all references to my life and experiences, reinforcing certain patriarchal patterns.
1/
I don't struggle (and write) because I'm a neutral observer who came to the rational conclusion that anarchism is the best, but because of my experiences in a patriarchal family, an abusive school, the psychiatric hospital, prison; because of seeing the forests and farmland
2/
that had been my refuge getting plowed under, the creeks silted up, for increasingly large, expensive houses and realizing that the same thing had happened for my own house; because of the realization that my life would be subordinated to massive debt or minimum-wage jobs
3/
As the world burns, it can be therapeutic to imagine throwing the wealthy on the fire and cackling as they writhe in the flames. (It's been a hard year, lay off). But there's a hitch: using monstrous tactics makes monsters of us.
*Anarchist ethics in the collapse*
1/
The fundamental idea of anarchist ethics is that means and ends are inseparable. But it goes beyond ethics. The idea that ends can justify the means is simplistic. It is a case of confusing the categories we use to parse reality with reality itself.
2/
The conditions always contain the methods that brought them about. Furthermore, there are no ends. Every day, history keeps moving along, and the methods we use to shape society become locked into, a part of, the society we create and recreate.
3/
Oh @GeorgeMonbiot you're soo close! This article is actually good, right up until the end, the classic pitfall of how do we solve this, where you fall into the delusional, magic wand solution of the 25% tipping point at which society spontaneously changes. theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
And what a perfect irony, the scientific study that supposedly backs up the idea of these magical tipping points is behind a pay wall.
The professionals and academics are finally starting to be vocal about systemic change being necessary and unavoidable. But they're too afraid to call this change by its name: revolution.