1/ What might an effective energy saving campaign look like? A quick thread on what other countries are doing and what’s missing in UK... in short we probably need:
❌Good public information
❌Comms campaign
❌Free advice
2/ The foundation is obviously good information. Needs to be accessible, simple, authoritative. Ministers have been pointing towards GOV.UK in recent days – so what’s there?
Well just 1 page, which leaves a lot to be desired... gov.uk/improve-energy…
2/ It's actually a form version of EPC rating guidance on things like insulation, double glazing. As others noted, very limited and not at all helpful for getting through this winter...
3/ And that's before you get to the fact that no one even knows its there (asking people to search GOV.UK does not suggest ministers have consulted any behavioral experts - or ever tried to find anything on it themselves...)
4/ For comparison – here is the German govt website: what’s immediately notable is several rationales for action (appealing to different audiences) and links to further information and simple advice, covering thermostats/lighting/showers etc etc... bmwk.de/Redaktion/EN/D…
5/ That leads to a campaign page and further reasons to act. Clear effort to foster a sense of national effort (not ‘green’ or ‘hairshirt’)
Can obviously then promote this type of messaging through digital advertising/media to reach a wide audience…
6/ UK could also look to Japan, which has had decades of experience encouraging people to be more energy efficient (since 1970s oil crisi).
Here is Tokyo campaign from September – again, lots of info/practical tips, different ways of reaching people... kankyo.metro.tokyo.lg.jp/climate/home/e…
7/ This is a more extreme example (from US last year), but interesting on what's possible with clear simple message, right means of communication etc - obviously requires preparation... bbc.co.uk/news/technolog…
8/ All of this could be replicated very easily / cheaply in UK, and (as @Samfr says) would pay back many times over. Govt has the info already (and can draw on external orgs currently trying to fill the gap)
9/ Clearly some nervousness about 'nannying' but that needn't stop you making sure everyone knows how to reduce energy use *if they want to*. Just need a decent comms teams and politicians willing to do it.
10/ The one thing that might take longer is offering free expert advice. This is important for giving people who need it confidence (and mitigating risks, like people dying in underheated homes). But funding has been cut and would need to rebuild capacity
11/ Citizens Advice has been doing a brilliant job on a shoe string, as have some local authorities. A quick/easy step wld be to support that. Both more trusted than UK politicians or energy companies. Suspect same true of Ofgem/NG? ENDS
As a footnote, worth highlighting some great examples from people outside govt, eg:
Good that these orgs are trying to fill a vacuum, but not realistically going to have scale/reach to move the dial in the way a serious govt campaign could...
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ The problem: govt started writing this strategy a month ago in response to an immediate security and affordability crisis. It ended up producing a long-term supply strategy that does little to address security or affordability in next 5 years at least
Some big announcements that are new (and many that are not). But the overall impression is of a quite confused product of casting around, bartering, lobbying… rather than any clear strategic vision about tackling the problem faced.
Here is what's happened in the UK over the last decade. UK has some of draughtiest and least efficient housing stock in Europe
Here is what @theCCCuk said about heat & buildings strat in Oct: “the lack of an integrated offer on home retrofit for the majority of households remains a real source of concern”
CCC and others have made the comparison with Germany - where a decades long scheme backed by the German national development bank KFW has led to very high deployment rates, grown mkt, brought down costs, and now *pays for itself*
NEW: joint report out today from @instituteforgov and @involveUK argues UK govt needs to adopt a much stronger approach to public engagement if it is to make a success of net zero (short thread)
There are many ways the UK could reach net zero. But all are going to involve big changes in people’s lives - their homes, their cars, most likely their diets, for some their jobs. That is unlike progress on emissions to date.
These changes will bring big benefits & could be part of a hugely positive story - of becoming a more modern, healthy and productive economy. There will also be costs involved, and these will need to be fairly distributed.
The difference between SAGE's approach to the March lockdown and now is striking. Quick thread:
In March, SAGE was pretty hesitant. Data was poor, there was lots of uncertainty about adherence and how long measures could be sustained, SAGE struggled to model impact of specific measures. See instituteforgovernment.org.uk/sites/default/…
It called for “more intensive actions” 10 days before & additional social distancing measures “as soon as possible” 7 days before. But it struggled to make argument for lockdown until it had clear evidence of risk of hospitals being overwhelmed.
In other news today... we @instituteforgov have a report out on another of the massive challenges government faces - net zero. Thread with some key points:
More than a year on from adopting the target, and with little over a year to go until it hosts COP26, the UK is a long way off track and lacks a credible plan for meeting its target
The UK has reduced emissions substantially in the power sector. But to get on track, emissions will need to fall in much more difficult sectors, where progress stalled. Unlike with the progress so far, these changes will go to the heart of people’s lives.
Robert Buckland has just announced that government will bring the whole probation service in-house from June 2021. That will mark the end of a badly failed experiment in outsourcing probation services, launched by Chris Grayling in 2013. Quick thread:
Worth reiterating that there has been massive disruption and confusion over the last seven years. Poor probation services have caused real harm to people trying to rebuild their lives. instituteforgovernment.org.uk/blog/ministry-…
Many (inc. @instituteforgov and several suppliers) warned at the time that outsourcing wouldn't work - there were few good providers & it was impossible to design and manage contracts that would hold companies to account. Grayling ignored & pushed ahead on a rushed timetable.