The Cultural Tutor Profile picture
Oct 10, 2022 25 tweets 10 min read Read on X
Why did the USA demolish all its train stations?

(none of these buildings are still standing) Image
When people think of American architecture they imagine (at best) Art Deco: Image
But, increasingly, people imagine faceless skyscrapers, shopping malls, superhighways, and grey box cities: Image
But the USA has a hidden architectural history, hidden because much of it was... demolished.

For many decades America was home to some of the world's foremost neoclassical and neogothic architecture. Like Columbia University's Library, built in the 1930s, which has survived: Image
And the USA had many incredible train terminals.

Because stations are large, vitally important public buildings, usually at the heart of a city and the first thing visitors will see. They are to be used *and* seen.

Like New York's Grand Central: Image
But New York's other great terminal, the old Pennsylvania Station, built in 1910 and demolished in 1968, is the most famous and egregious example of train station destruction.

It was a vast and quite extraordinary building, one of the biggest public spaces in the world: Image
Its demolition was justified on the basis that Penn Station was grimy, in disrepair, and increasingly underused.

So they knocked it down and built Madison Square Garden on the site, while refurbishing the underground sections. An upgrade? ImageImage
And here is all that's left of the original, a few old staircases: Image
But New York's Penn Station is just the most famous of many train stations demolished right across the USA, from the east to the west coast and everything in between.

Consider Memphis Union Station, demolished in 1969 because of negligible passenger numbers: Image
And consider Birmingham Terminal Station in Alabama, a rather unusual and striking neo-Byzantine building, opened in 1909 and closed in the 1950s.

It was demolished in 1969 to make room for a new highway: Image
Or Chicago Grand Central, opened in 1890, closed in 1969 because it was "decaying, dreary, and sadly out of date", and demolished in 1971.

The site on which it stood was vacant until a couple of years ago, when a new residential construction project finally broke ground. ImageImage
And, in clockwose order:
-Savannah Union Station, opened in 1902 and demolished in 1963 to make room for... a highway
-New Orleans' Southern Railway Terminal (1908-1956)
-Los Angeles' Central Station (1914-1956)
-Detroit's Fort Street Union Depot (1893-1974) ImageImageImageImage
You get the idea.

Some have survived from this great era of station building, like Baltimore's Penn Station, built in 1911 and still going strong: ImageImage
Many things are striking about these lost stations.

It's been said before, but buildings intended very specifically for the public which are designed with care and an interest in beauty help to create a sense of civic pride and identity.

(Terminal Station, Atlanta, 1905-1972) Image
And so, while we may admire their quite remarkable range of American-enthused neo-Classical, neo-Gothic, and even neo-Byzantine style, and while we may marvel at their gloriously decorated interiors, it's important to remember that there was a purpose to all that.
And you'll notice a trend. Many of America's great train stations were destroyed in a specific period - the 1950s-1970s.

What else happened around this time? Image
So, cars are one thing. We'll get to that.

Though it's worth pointing out broader architectural trends at the time, when Brutalism came storming out of Britain, post-War population booms called for rapid solutions, and buildings started to look like this: Image
So, was the rise of the car inevitable? Was it simply a fact of life that cars would replace trains and the great terminals would therefore become obsolete?

Maybe, maybe not. It certainly didn't happen everywhere in the world. But that's actually irrelevant here...
See, in 2017 the new Penn Station in New York was treated to a brand new neoclassical entrance, harking back to the glory days of old, complete with a magnificent waiting hall to rival its former incarnation: ImageImage
Except it wasn't brand new, it was the *former* New York Post General Post Office, now known as the James A. Farley Building, opened in 1914.

It's now a mixed-use site, host to retail facilities and, lately, the entrance to Penn Station. ImageImage
Which is the most important point here.

Regardless of whether cars make trains and their stations obsolete, that doesn't mean the buildings need to be demolished; they can be repurposed, just like the James A. Farley building was.

Isn't that better than destroying them? Union Station, Columbus, Oh...
And yet, even accepting that a station requires demolition, that begs the question of what its replacement should look like.

Here's how they replaced the Wabash Pittsburgh Terminal, built in 1904 and demolished in 1956 after fire wrecked the building: ImageImage
But here is Philadelphia's Broad Street Station, built in 1881, which was ravaged by successive fires and declining use and eventually demolished in 1953.

Parts of its decline was due a newer, better station, more fit for purpose, the 30th Street Station of 1933, still standing: ImageImageImageBroad Street Station (1881-...
So repurposing (ideally) or more civic-minded replacement are options for when cars make train stations obsolete, without even addressing the fact that cars do not *inevitably* make trains obsolete.

But that's a discussion for another day...
This photograph sums it up, really: the demolition of Minneapolis Great Northern Depot in 1978.

A whole chapter of the USA's architectural history destroyed and, it seems, lost forever. Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with The Cultural Tutor

The Cultural Tutor Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @culturaltutor

Aug 31
We spend more than 90% of our time inside, so why do we design so many of our interiors like this?

Grey carpets, white walls, harsh lighting.

It's generic, boring, and genuinely bad for our physical and psychological health... Image
Not all interiors look like this, but too many do, and more all the time.

Grey carpets, white walls, harsh lighting, neutral colours for details, everything plastic, shiny, and rectangular.

This has become the standard for new buildings (and refurbishments) around the world. Image
A common response is that some people like it, or at least don't mind it.

Maybe, but that's the problem.

The sum of all tastes is no taste at all, and if our aim is simply to make things that people "don't mind" then we end up with blandness. Image
Read 22 tweets
Aug 21
The world's most famous neoclassical buildings are kind of boring and generic when you actually look at them.

It's even hard to tell them apart: which one below is Versailles, or Buckingham Palace?

So here's why neoclassical architecture (although it's nice) is overrated: Image
Buckingham Palace, despite being one of the world's most famous and visited buildings, is essentially quite boring and uninspiring from the outside.

There's a certain stateliness to it, but (like most big neoclassical buildings) it's really just a box wrapped in pilasters. Image
The same is true of Versailles.

Again, it's evidently pretty (largely thanks to the colour of its stone) but there's something weirdly plain about it, almost standardised.

Plus the emphasis on its horizontal lines makes it feel very low-lying, undramatic, and flat. Image
Read 26 tweets
Aug 17
These aren't castles, palaces, or cathedrals.

They're all water towers, literally just bits of infrastructure relating to water management.

Is it worth the additional cost and resources to make things look like this... or is it a waste? Image
These old water towers are an architectural subgenre of their own.

There are hundreds, mostly Neo-Gothic, and all add something wonderful to the skylines of their cities.

Like the one below in Bydgoszcz, Poland, from 1900.

But, most importantly, they're just infrastructure. Image
We don't think of infrastructure as something that can improve how a town looks and feels.

Infrastructure is necessary to make life convenient; but also, we believe, definitionally boring.

These water towers prove that doesn't have to, and shouldn't be, the case. Image
Read 24 tweets
Aug 8
If one thing sums up the 21st century it's got to be all these default profile pictures.

You've seen them literally thousands of times, but they're completely generic and interchangeable.

Future historians will use them to symbolise our current era, and here's why... Image
To understand what any society truly believed, and how they felt about humankind, you need to look at what they created rather than what they said.

Just as actions instead of words reveal who a person really is, art always tells you what a society was actually like.
And this is particularly true of how they depicted human beings — how we portray ourselves.

That the Pharaohs were of supreme power, and were worshipped as gods far above ordinary people, is made obvious by the sheer size and abundance of the statues made in their name: Image
Read 23 tweets
Aug 6
This is St. Anne's Church in Vilnius, Lithuania.

It's over 500 years old and the perfect example of a strange architectural style known as "Brick Gothic".

But, more importantly, it's a lesson in how imagination can transform the way our world looks... Image
Vilnius has one of the world's best-preserved Medieval old towns.

It's a UNESCO World Heritage Site, filled with winding streets and architectural gems from across the ages.

A testament to the wealth, grandeur, and sophistication of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Image
Among its many treasures is the Church of St Anne, built from 1495 to 1500 under the Duke of Lithuania and (later) King of Poland, Alexander I Jagiellon.

It's not particularly big — a single nave without aisles — but St Anne's makes up for size with its fantastical brickwork. Image
Read 18 tweets
Jul 31
Tell your friends! Your enemies! Your lovers!

The Spanish edition of my new book, El Tutor Cultural, is now available for pre-order.

It'll be released on 22 October — and you can get it at the link in my bio.

To celebrate, here are the 10 best things I've written about Spain: from why Barcelona looks the way it does to one of the world's most underrated modern architects, from the truth about Pablo Picasso to the origins of the Spanish football badge...Image
What makes Barcelona such a beautiful city? It wasn't an accident — this is the story of how the modern, beloved Barcelona was consciously created:

Image
And, speaking of Barcelona, here's why the renovation of the Camp Nou is — although necessary — a shame:

Image
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(