The Cultural Tutor Profile picture
Oct 10, 2022 25 tweets 10 min read Read on X
Why did the USA demolish all its train stations?

(none of these buildings are still standing) Image
When people think of American architecture they imagine (at best) Art Deco: Image
But, increasingly, people imagine faceless skyscrapers, shopping malls, superhighways, and grey box cities: Image
But the USA has a hidden architectural history, hidden because much of it was... demolished.

For many decades America was home to some of the world's foremost neoclassical and neogothic architecture. Like Columbia University's Library, built in the 1930s, which has survived: Image
And the USA had many incredible train terminals.

Because stations are large, vitally important public buildings, usually at the heart of a city and the first thing visitors will see. They are to be used *and* seen.

Like New York's Grand Central: Image
But New York's other great terminal, the old Pennsylvania Station, built in 1910 and demolished in 1968, is the most famous and egregious example of train station destruction.

It was a vast and quite extraordinary building, one of the biggest public spaces in the world: Image
Its demolition was justified on the basis that Penn Station was grimy, in disrepair, and increasingly underused.

So they knocked it down and built Madison Square Garden on the site, while refurbishing the underground sections. An upgrade? ImageImage
And here is all that's left of the original, a few old staircases: Image
But New York's Penn Station is just the most famous of many train stations demolished right across the USA, from the east to the west coast and everything in between.

Consider Memphis Union Station, demolished in 1969 because of negligible passenger numbers: Image
And consider Birmingham Terminal Station in Alabama, a rather unusual and striking neo-Byzantine building, opened in 1909 and closed in the 1950s.

It was demolished in 1969 to make room for a new highway: Image
Or Chicago Grand Central, opened in 1890, closed in 1969 because it was "decaying, dreary, and sadly out of date", and demolished in 1971.

The site on which it stood was vacant until a couple of years ago, when a new residential construction project finally broke ground. ImageImage
And, in clockwose order:
-Savannah Union Station, opened in 1902 and demolished in 1963 to make room for... a highway
-New Orleans' Southern Railway Terminal (1908-1956)
-Los Angeles' Central Station (1914-1956)
-Detroit's Fort Street Union Depot (1893-1974) ImageImageImageImage
You get the idea.

Some have survived from this great era of station building, like Baltimore's Penn Station, built in 1911 and still going strong: ImageImage
Many things are striking about these lost stations.

It's been said before, but buildings intended very specifically for the public which are designed with care and an interest in beauty help to create a sense of civic pride and identity.

(Terminal Station, Atlanta, 1905-1972) Image
And so, while we may admire their quite remarkable range of American-enthused neo-Classical, neo-Gothic, and even neo-Byzantine style, and while we may marvel at their gloriously decorated interiors, it's important to remember that there was a purpose to all that.
And you'll notice a trend. Many of America's great train stations were destroyed in a specific period - the 1950s-1970s.

What else happened around this time? Image
So, cars are one thing. We'll get to that.

Though it's worth pointing out broader architectural trends at the time, when Brutalism came storming out of Britain, post-War population booms called for rapid solutions, and buildings started to look like this: Image
So, was the rise of the car inevitable? Was it simply a fact of life that cars would replace trains and the great terminals would therefore become obsolete?

Maybe, maybe not. It certainly didn't happen everywhere in the world. But that's actually irrelevant here...
See, in 2017 the new Penn Station in New York was treated to a brand new neoclassical entrance, harking back to the glory days of old, complete with a magnificent waiting hall to rival its former incarnation: ImageImage
Except it wasn't brand new, it was the *former* New York Post General Post Office, now known as the James A. Farley Building, opened in 1914.

It's now a mixed-use site, host to retail facilities and, lately, the entrance to Penn Station. ImageImage
Which is the most important point here.

Regardless of whether cars make trains and their stations obsolete, that doesn't mean the buildings need to be demolished; they can be repurposed, just like the James A. Farley building was.

Isn't that better than destroying them? Union Station, Columbus, Oh...
And yet, even accepting that a station requires demolition, that begs the question of what its replacement should look like.

Here's how they replaced the Wabash Pittsburgh Terminal, built in 1904 and demolished in 1956 after fire wrecked the building: ImageImage
But here is Philadelphia's Broad Street Station, built in 1881, which was ravaged by successive fires and declining use and eventually demolished in 1953.

Parts of its decline was due a newer, better station, more fit for purpose, the 30th Street Station of 1933, still standing: ImageImageImageBroad Street Station (1881-...
So repurposing (ideally) or more civic-minded replacement are options for when cars make train stations obsolete, without even addressing the fact that cars do not *inevitably* make trains obsolete.

But that's a discussion for another day...
This photograph sums it up, really: the demolition of Minneapolis Great Northern Depot in 1978.

A whole chapter of the USA's architectural history destroyed and, it seems, lost forever. Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with The Cultural Tutor

The Cultural Tutor Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @culturaltutor

May 21
When Vincent van Gogh started painting he didn't use any bright colours — so what happened?

It isn't just about art.

This is a story about how we're all changed by the things we consume, the places we go, and the people we choose to spend time with... Image
The year is 1881.

A 27 year old former teacher and missionary from the Netherlands called Vincent van Gogh decides to try and become a full-time artist, after being encouraged by his brother Theo.

What does he paint? The peasants of the countryside where his parents lived. Scheveningen Woman Sewing (1881)
Vincent van Gogh's early work is unrecognisably different from the vibrant painter now beloved around the world.

Why?

Many reasons, though one of the most important is that he had been influenced by his cousin, the Realist painter Anton Mauve, who painted like this: Fishing Boat and Draught Horses on the Beach by Anton Mauve
Read 23 tweets
May 13
This painting is 101 years old.

It was made by George Bellows, one of America's greatest ever painters — and an artist who changed what art was all about... Image
There have been many great American painters.

Like Frederic Edwin Church and the rest of the Hudson River School.

During the 19th century they painted colossal, almost photorealistic, luminescent views of the American landscape: Image
Then there's the legendary Edward Hopper and his quiet, captivating urban scenes.

There's a certain quality to life in the city — its solitude, its strange stillness — that nobody has portrayed better. Image
Read 24 tweets
May 5
Napoleon died 204 years ago today.

He rose from obscurity, joined a revolution, became an emperor, tried to conquer Europe, failed, spent his last days in exile — and changed the world forever.

This is the life of Napoleon, told in 19 paintings: Image
1. Bonaparte at the Pont d'Arcole by Antoine-Jean Gros (1796)

Napoleon's life during the French Revolution was complicated, but by the age of 24 he was already a General.

Here, aged just 27, he led the armies of the French Republic to victory in Italy — his star was rising. Image
2. The Battle of the Pyramids by François-Louis-Joseph Watteau (1799)

Two years later Napoleon oversaw the invasion of Egypt as part of an attempt to undermine British trade.

At the Battle of the Pyramids he led the French to a crushing victory over the Ottomans and Mamluks. Image
Read 20 tweets
Apr 27
It took 8 architects, 21 popes, and 120 years to build and finish St Peter's Basilica in Rome.

And, four centuries later, it's still the largest church in the world.

So here's a brief introduction to St Peter's... Image
The first impression anybody has when they see St Peter's Basilica in Rome, in real life or in a photo, is awe.

Because this is an immensely impressive building — it was and remains the world's largest church by volume.

Others are taller, but none are so vast. Image
The same is true of the inside — a cornucopia of art and architecture, of gold and bronze and marble and mosaic and sculpture.

And, again, it has proportions beyond gargantuan.

The baldachin alone (a kind of ornate canopy, below) is 30 metres tall. Image
Read 25 tweets
Apr 22
The Sistine Chapel is one of the world's greatest buildings, and it has the most famous ceiling in history.

But what is it, who built it, and what does "Sistine" even mean?

Well, here's the surprisingly controversial history of the Sistine Chapel... Image
Where did the Sistine Chapel get its name?

It was commissioned in 1473 by Pope Sixtus IV and completed nine years later.

His name in Italian was Sisto and the chapel was named after him, hence "Sistine" Chapel. Image
Where is the Sistine Chapel?

It's within the Apostolic Palace — the Pope's official residence — in the Vatican City.

But, for such a famous and important building, it isn't very noteworthy or impressive from the outside. Image
Read 25 tweets
Apr 18
This is Burg Hohenzollern in Germany, one of the world's most beautiful Medieval castles.

Except that it isn't a Medieval castle — trains had been invented before it was built.

And so Hohenzollern is a perfect introduction to Neo-Gothic Architecture... Image
If you want to understand Neo-Gothic Architecture then the best place to begin is with something like Hohenzollern.

It seems too good to be true — and that's because it is.

What you're looking at here isn't a Medieval castle; it's not even 200 years old. Image
There has been some kind of fortification on this hill, at the edge of the Swabian Alps, for over one thousand years.

An 11th century castle was destroyed and replaced in the 15th century, but that second castle soon fell into ruin. Image
Read 24 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(