Just fleshing out this point. I assume you don't include in this coverage of overt investigative acts—like, for example, the search of Mar-a-Lago or the execution of warrants in the Jan. 6 case. Those should be reported pre-indictment or not?
But I take it in retrospect, you think the proper amount of reporting on the Hillary Clinton email investigation (prior to Jim Comey's statement closing it) was zero?
And that you don't believe the press should be trying to figure out what John Durham is up to beyond the three specific cases he has brought?
You can say that as often as you like, but there is simply no evidence that it’s true. How do you know, for example, that Greenberg didn’t feed the story to journalists to make his cooperation seem big and important and valuable? How do you know that Gaetz himself didn’t do it…
…to control the circumstances of its disclosure and play the victim to people like you? How do you know that Trump-era DOJ formers didn’t disclose it? You can make up whatever facts you want to, but the truth is that you don’t anything how this story became public.
Also, if you are going to say that the press owes Gaetz an apology, it seems to me you need to identify something in the coverage that is wrong.