For open wheel race cars, the wake from the front tyre is a very important thing to understand. It can impact many of the aerodynamic elements downstream. The complex structures around the tyre are 3D, and very complex #F1Tech 🧵
There are many research papers and articles studying this very phenomena. What you should know is that the wake is not stagnant but influenced by many factors like tyre rotation speed, wheel covers/no covers, tyre deflectors, etc.. #F1Tech 🧵
Previously the F1 wheels were exposed to the flow, but with the updated technical regulations using wheel covers, the aim was to reduce the dirty air from this interaction. The aim of the wheel covers was to clean up the width of the wheel wake. #F1Tech 🧵
Additionally, a front tyre deflector has been added to reduce the FT turbulence intensity and push it lower to the ground. One negative of this is the relocation of flow structures inboard towards the tunnel entry. This is likely managed by the outer most floor strake. #F1Tech 🧵
A tool at the disposal of F1 engineers is the Front Wing for front tyre wake control. Not only does the FW generate downforce for aero balance, it also conditions the flow for downstream elements. The FT wake is influenced by these vortical structures from the FW. #F1Tech 🧵
The location of the end plates can greatly influence this interaction of the vortices with the FT. The location of the vortices, inboard or outboard of the FT is greatly influenced by this. The updated regs for 2009 show this well. #F1Tech 🧵
The updated technical regulations have removed a lot of the aero complexity of the FW. This removes some of the tools that teams had to manage the FT wake. Teams have resorted to using the side pods for much of this wake control. #F1Tech 🧵
One interesting interpretation of the regs by @MercedesAMGF1 resulted in this cut FWEP. Without the CFD it's hard to say for sure, but one thought is potentially the unloading of the tip might generate some vorticity that could be swept under the FW and inboard of the FT. #F1Tech
Inboard of the front brake drum is a FOM mostly spec component called the front drum deflector. This may act like a dive plane and generate minimal vorticity to help with inboard FT wake deflection. #F1Tech
📸 @ScarbsTech
I hope you have enjoyed this #F1Tech 🧵on FT wake structures and the importance of controlling them. The updated regulations have made it more challenging, but teams are still finding ways to innovate. What could we see in 2023? Next tech thread will be coming, stay tuned!
Also, if you enjoy #F1Tech content like this, then be sure to follow our podcast @TechHeadsF1 where we talk all about F1 technical topics with many great guests!
People often ask me, "where can I find great information on motorsports and aerodynamics?" So how about a thread of some of my favorites? And no, I don't get paid to endorse these. I just think F1 Tech is a great place to share knowledge! Also, this is NOT an exhaustive list, but some that stick out to me. Feel free to add yours as well below!
Video below by Vyssion and JJN.
Let's start with some of my favorite books on car aerodynamics! "Race Car Aerodynamics: Designing for Speed" by Joseph Katz is goated. A really great book covering all types of race cars and written for anyone at any level. I highly recommend this book.
Another book that is sort of an extension of Katz is one from Simon McBeath called "Competition Car Aerodynamics." It's like a newer version of Katz book, and with a bit of very simple CFD in it as well.
Is the RB20 great? Or is Max Verstappen + the RB20 great? I spent some of the weekend looking through the telemetry. And here is what I have found. In summary, Max Verstappen is a Swiss f*cking watch. Well, maybe a Dutch watch. Let's look at it in this thread.
Looking at the macro view level lap times to gage consistency, you can see that it's incredibly consistent irrespective of compoud. Credit to Checo as well, his lap times in Bahrain were also very consistent, but also consistently 5-tenths to 1 second slower per lap. But why?
Looking over the a single lap, many show similar characteristics. It's like death by a thousand paper cuts, or in this case by 15 corners. The intricacy and precision of driving from one corner to the next builds delta from corner to corner.
Was the RB19 of MV really slow on the straights compared to the other teams? Or was something else going on? We know that MV wasn't fortunate to gain any DRS or slipstream after passing LN, but what else was going on? Let's understand this more in the thread below. 🧵
If we look first at the pit straight into Turns 1 and 2, comparing LN and MV, we see something peculiar. MV never upshifts to 8th gear, but holds 7th. Thus, his engine RPM is higher and he doesn't lift into T1. He does, however, lose time slightly to LN due to the lower speed. 🧵
Looking at the onboards, LN is 1.336s behind MV so he may catch a very slight tow, but the top speed delta here is 4kph with LN reaching 300kph. By MV never upshifting to 8th gear he limits his T1 entry speed, but doesn't have to lift as a result. 🧵
Well that helps to solve that mystery. Had also heard that this plank was painted so they could observe the wear patterns better. Looking at this, the plank wear is quite low overall. How about a thread comparing my observations of the RB, Merc, and Ferrari wear patterns.🧵
The bib looks to be running quite low. Possibly some forward rake, as most suspect. RB is able to run their forward floor very low, and still ride curbs and manage bump tracks like Monaco. A bit more left sided mid wear. 🧵
Mid floor looks pretty stable with little wear. Same preferential left side wear from previous image along the length of the mid floor. No floor flexing going on here. 😉 🧵
There is a quote in here that perfectly summarizes what I have been trying to say about the complexity seeing an image of a floor, and then getting a floor to work well.
"Talking to an engineer from the Milton Keynes team, not too worried about the photographs taken of their.."
"..underbody in Montecarlo, he explained to us that it is easier to work on the cross section of the channels while the slope (height) variation part inside is much more complicated to the tunnel and the simultaneous generation of eddies; an infinite job, among other things.."
".., since a car never works with a constant height but has many external elements, such as bumps, and dynamics, such as roll, pitch, etc., which greatly complicate the design of what it is the most important aerodynamic component of these new F1 cars..."
Ok so I had questions like many about the legality of the new @MercedesAMGF1#W14b spec floor winglet. With the help of some friends, I did a bit of digging into the regulations to understand this better. A 🧵@Formula_Nerds@AlbertFabrega
The regulation boxes are sometimes super confusing so it's best to start with an overview of them. The below link is a good place to start to understand the regulation boxes where engineers can design within. Each reg box is controlled differently. 🧵racecar-engineering.com/articles/tech-…
So after looking at the reg boxes, these aero features can only be in these potential volumes, Front Chassis, Mid Chassis, Floor body, Floor fence, or Rear Body Work Sidepod. So now lets eliminate them 1 by 1. First it can't be fence, because these aren't floor fences 🧵