Lisa Rubin Profile picture
Oct 11 9 tweets 2 min read
I've read DOJ's brief opposing Trump's emergency request for relief so you don't have to. DOJ nicely swats away the legal thrust of Trump's argument -- that the appellate court lacked pendent jurisdiction. 1/
If the ground rules for what can be appealed and when during the life of a case interest you, I highly recommend reading my friend @steve_vladeck's thread from earlier today. This won't be that kind of thread. 2/
@steve_vladeck Rather, what interests me is whether DOJ refuted any of Trump's factual allegations with its own narrative. While it could have addressed Trump's insistence that all of the classified docs were sent to Mar-a-Lago *before* his presidency was over, it didn't. 3/
And the reason, says DOJ without raising that or any other particular "fact" Trump offered, is that it doesn't matter. Even a purportedly declassified document can't be his personal property and can't be the subject of any attorney-client privilege. It's still a "red herring." 4/
That doesn't mean DOJ didn't take some swipes at Trump. Swipe 1: Trump can't claim he's allowed 24/7 access to documents under the PRA because having never returned them to the National Archives, he's basically forfeited the right to invoke the Presidential Records Act. 5/
Swipe 2: Trump insists he's declassified everything in public, but he's "never represented in any of his multiple legal filings in multiple courts that he in fact declassified any documents -- much less supported such a representation with competent evidence." 6/
Swipe 3 (in a footnote!): Trump used to yammer about executive privilege--but not recently. That's probably because it doesn't exist vis a vis other executive branch agencies -- e.g., DOJ -- but even if it did, we've proven an urgent need for the stuff. 7/
And swipe 4? If he wants "emergency" relief, he has to show he's likely to win on the merits and that he's being irreparably harmed. He didn't even try. 8/
So nothing especially new or sexy, but a clear, highly competent brief that feels a little like a veteran kindergarten teacher calmly correcting a naughty kid. FIN

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Lisa Rubin

Lisa Rubin Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @lawofruby

Oct 13
The New York Attorney General is seeking a preliminary injunction that would prevent any material assets from being transferred out of the existing Trump Organization entities. Why? Because Trump has a new DE company d/b/a Trump Organization II. 1/

ag.ny.gov/sites/default/…
And that company was registered with NY state on 9/21/2022, the same day NYAG filed its massive fraud lawsuit against the Trumps and the Trump Org. It suggests strongly that Trump has created a new Trump Org. to prevent Tish James from imploding his business in New York. 2/
NYAG also seeks other, immediate relief, including the appointment of an independent monitor and a prohibition on the issuance of any statements of Trump’s financial condition that do not “adequately disclose the assumptions and techniques used for valuing his assets.” 3/
Read 7 tweets
Oct 13
Last night, NYT reported that the Trump aide seen on security footage moving boxes is a former White House employee named Walt Nauta. 1/ nytimes.com/2022/10/12/us/…
We have heard about Nauta before. In August, CNN listed him among several people either involved in moving documents from the WH to Mar-a-Lago or familiar with the storage of those documents at MAL who were interviewed by federal investigators. 2/

cnn.com/2022/08/11/pol…
That reporting identified Nauta as a former White House valet. And on the verge of today’s Jan. 6 hearing, I remind you that one or more WH valets appear to have been with Trump at critical moments on that day. 3/

msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-…
Read 7 tweets
Oct 9
Big week coming up for Trump & the law: DOJ’s brief to SCOTUS on Trump’s “emergency” attempt to revive the Special Master’s review of the classified docs is due Tuesday. DOJ’s brief on its own appeal of the whole special master process is due to the 11th Circuit Friday. 1/
Meanwhile, the Oath Keepers seditious conspiracy trial enters week 2, while the 1/6 committee has what is likely its last public hearing on Thursday. 2/
And these are just the *scheduled* events taking place in courts and Congress. It doesn’t account for new reporting from dogged print reporters on the records and 1/6 investigations. It doesn’t account for Trump’s baseless offensive against DOJ at rallies or over Truth Social. 3/
Read 4 tweets
Oct 7
Earlier this week, in their brief to SCOTUS, Team Trump said he "was still the President of the United States when any documents bearing classification markings were delivered to his residence in Palm Beach, Florida" and therefore, he was fully free to declassify them. 1/
Enter @JasonLeopold, who got loads of emails between Trump's post-presidential team and the General Services Administration regarding what was moved to Mar-a-Lago, how, and when. His story (and the accompanying docs) shows the boxes were not moved to FL until Sept. 2021. 2/
This is the story @jasonleopold published, which links to the documents themselves. 3/ bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
Read 6 tweets
Oct 6
And what is truly outrageous about the decision is its fidelity to what the court sees as this Supreme Court's fixation with history and tradition. In contrast to a view of the law as a living growth, the decision sees the Constitution as colonial carbonite. 1/
The thrust of Judge Suddaby's analysis is that no city or state can restrict guns unless the law or reg at issue is "consistent with this Nation's historical tradition of firearm regulation." In other words, if they didn't do it in 1776 (or 1868), forget about it. 2/
But as applied, that leads to some truly disturbing conclusions. On one hand, Suddaby decides that NY *can* require character references because there's historical precedent . . . including an 1832 Delaware statute requiring such references for "free Negroes." No, not a joke. 3/
Read 8 tweets
Oct 4
I have read Trump's request to SCOTUS. He is not asking to block DOJ's review of the classified docs; rather, he is asking only to allow Judge Dearie to resume his review of the classified records. The question is why? 1/
Since the 11th Circuit has stayed the special master's review of the classified docs, Judge Dearie doesn't even have those docs. Guess who else doesn't have a copy? Team Trump. 2/
And that's *exactly* why they are doing this. Jim Trusty already confessed to Judge Dearie that Team Trump does not have its own index or list of the documents Trump was squirreling away at Mar-a-Lago. And even if it did, there's no substitute for having the docs in hand. 3/
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(