David Ho Profile picture
Oct 12 34 tweets 9 min read
There should be a #ClimateTwitter #EnergyTwitter FAQ.
1. Where does the concept of "carbon footprint" come from?

2. Is it true that if we remove 2 GtCO₂ from the atmosphere, the ocean and land will outgas and equilibrate with the new atmosphere so that we will only achieve a reduction of 1 GtCO₂?

4. If the difference between 180 and 280 ppm CO₂ was the difference between an ice age and a temperate climate, why does an increase of another 150 ppm CO₂ lead to "only" ~3°C of warming?

5. What should we call the purposeful addition of alkalinity to the ocean for atmospheric CO₂ removal?

6. What does the latest IPCC report say about atmospheric CO₂ removal (CDR)?

6. Where can I find data on global premature mortality due to PM₂.₅ pollution from fossil fuel combustion?

8. How should we think about the nexus between electric vehicles, car dependency, and better cities?

9. Why should we contemplate atmospheric CO₂ removal (CDR) when we can just decrease the amount of solar radiation reaching the Earth's surface (solar radiation management; SRM)?

11. How much global warming is caused by CH₄ vs. after it has oxidized to CO₂?

12. How can I learn about climate change and colonialism?

13. Where can I find a list of known atmospheric CO₂ removal (CDR) purchases?

14. Does having more rainy days and more extreme daily rainfall events harm the economy?

15. How do life cycle greenhouse gas emissions from a battery electric vehicle compared to that of an internal combustion engine vehicle?

16. Why does food waste have such a large climate impact?

17. Should I use the term “climate emergency,” “climate crisis,” or “climate change”?

18. What percent of fossil fuel CO₂ emissions have occurred in my lifetime?

19. How confident are we about future global warming projections?

20. Is precipitating calcium carbonate in seawater a good climate solution?

21. Are climate disinformation and greenwashing the same things?

22. Where can I find information about current US legislation relevant to technologies and practices that remove and store carbon?

23. What's so great about heat pumps as a climate solution?

24. How long would it take for nature to remove all fossil fuel CO₂ from the atmosphere?

25. Why does direct air capture (DAC) to removal atmospheric CO₂ take so much energy?

26. How were the land and ocean CO₂ sinks different before we started burning fossil fuels?

27. How has atmospheric CO₂ changed in the last 800,000 years?

29. How much more global warming will we have once we reach net zero CO₂ emissions?
31. If we double atmospheric CO₂ from 280 ppm, how much are we likely to warm the planet?

32. What's more important for climate, food miles or choice of diet?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with David Ho

David Ho Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @_david_ho_

Dec 9, 2021
In the 40s and 50s, atomic scientists though about nuclear as energy of the future. The US Atomic Energy Commission published Energy in the Future in 1953 where they argued that burning fossil fuel releases CO₂, which affects the climate & sea level 1/n

hdl.handle.net/2027/uc1.b4263… ImageImage
1953…when Elizabeth II was crowned Queen of…all those countries! This was 5 years before Dave Keeling starting measuring atmospheric CO₂ at Mauna Loa in Hawaii. It's worth noting that Keeling's initial research on CO₂ was funded by the US Atomic Energy Commission. 2/n
Energy in the Future pointed out that temperature had been increasing, glaciers were retreating, and sea level was rising, and speculated that it was due to rising atmospheric CO₂ from land use change and fossil fuel burning! In 1953…68 years ago! 3/n Image
Read 5 tweets
Aug 14, 2021
🧵 Enough people have shared this clipping from the NZ paper Rodney and Otamatea Times, Waitemata and Kaipara Gazette that it's worth looking at the original Popular Mechanics article from which it's reprinted, also from 1912. 1/5
"Remarkable Weather of 1911", starts by describing the extreme weather of 1911 ("cities baked and gasped for breath" "flood-gates of the heavens were opened" "violent storms" "killing frost") and above average temps.

It speculated this is part of natural variability. 2/5
After listing evidence for climate variability, it speculates:

"It is highly improbable that the mean temperature will change sensibly in a thousand years, and very probable that it will not be much different from what it is at present ten thousand years from now." 😬 3/5
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(