When I was deciding whether to change careers, what helped me most was finding my core values.
What values are most important in your life? Are you making decisions based on these values?
Here’s how you can determine your core values & make any big life decision:
1/
First, brainstorm your values. You can even rank order them.
If you don’t know where to start, look at a list. Think about which ones resonate with you.
What makes you feel happiest & most fulfilled? If people said, “you’re such a X person”, would that be validating?
2/
My top core values are:
1. Growth, both personal & professional
2. Openness, to people & experiences
3. Kindness, to myself & others
I also resonate with honesty, bravery, calmness, ambition, creativity, brilliance, fun, & diversity.
There are no right or wrong answers!
3/
Then, consider your big decision. For me, it was whether I wanted to stay in academia & try to become a prof, or whether I wanted to find an #altac job.
I wanted to make my decision based on growth, openness, & kindness. What decision would allow me to live these values?
4/
My 💡 moment happened when I realized that I wanted to stay in academia because it was all I knew. It was familiar. And I was scared.
These weren’t my values!
I’m not scared of growth or new experiences. And staying certainly wasn’t the kind thing for my mental health.
5/
So I changed careers. And it was hard!
But saying goodbye to my academic identity allowed me to grow 🌿
By being open to new experiences, I found a job that I loved more than my academic job 🌈
And I am finally free of academic criticism, so I can be kind to myself 🌸
6/
I’ve come back to my values time & time again - every time I have a hard decision to make. It’s been so grounding and useful.
What are your core values? 💛
/end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
PhD students: if you want to pursue a TT faculty position, I highly recommend sitting on a hiring committee in your dept. Check out how the hiring process works!
I sat on a hiring committee as a 4th year phd, & what I saw made me reconsider my entire career trajectory. 1/
The sheer number of applicants will shock you. We had 120 people (a low #) applying for one position. We could only choose three for on-site interviews.
And if you still have any delusions that TT hiring is merit-based, sitting on a hiring committee will fix that real quick. 2/
I saw applicants rejected for having a "boring research program" or not being "committed" enough to academia.
I saw committee members have clear "favorites" who were pushed along.
I seemed to be the only one who read the diversity or teaching statements. 3/
When I started looking at non-academic job ads, I often thought "what does this even mean??" It's easy to believe you're unqualified for a job when you don't understand industry jargon.
So here are my top five must-know terms, translated for academics: 1/ #AltAcChats
1. "Communicate with key stakeholders" = talk to people with an interest in your work
Stakeholders in academia are PIs, funding agencies, or your university. You communicate with stakeholders when you give any kind of research or project update (presentation, report, etc).
2/
2. "Create deliverables" = create a tangible product from your work
Deliverables in academia are typically published papers or reports. You may also develop a program or intervention as the result of your research--anything that marks a project as completed.
3/
A fourth year of a post-doc or an #altac job. Those were my choices in January 2022. I chose the latter. And I’m happy now.
My first job wasn’t at a FAANG (Facebook, Apple, Amazon, Netflix, Google). All my interviews were still between $95k-$120k - twice my post-doc salary. 3/
I thought this went without saying, but UX is not the only job for phds outside of academia. It’s also not the only type of job I applied for.
Here’s a list of jobs that I interviewed for & why I ultimately chose UX (it’s not for the reason you think): #AltAcChats
1. Behavioral Scientist (at a mental health startup)
In this role, I would have conducted research (mostly surveys/experiments) on how to improve mental health in the workplace. They were looking for a PhD in Psych with R skills.
2. Social Scientist (at a progressive political collective)
In this role, I would have conducted research on how to improve voter turnout for progressive candidates. They wanted a Social/Poli Sci researcher with R skills to analyze large datasets.
Since May, I’ve talked with over 100 phds in (unpaid!) DMs & zoom chats about “leaving” academia.
Here’s what I’ve learned about the state of academia, moving to #altac, & why profs should expect the post-doc shortage to continue for the foreseeable future. 1/
The scale of this problem is worse than you can imagine. It ranges from coercion to “stay” in academia to outright bullying. I’ve counseled many talented phds who are rightfully very angry and bitter towards academia.
2/
2. PhDs want to leave, but feel “trapped” in academia.
Many phds feel that they have no transferable skills & no knowledge on how to apply for #altac jobs. They don’t know how to get started in their search or what jobs are out there. Their training has failed them here.
3/
You may have a strong negative reaction to the word "products". But we all use products! Right now, I'm using my computer, headphones, & the @Spotify app: all built with UXR.
UXR is also done on products like medical devices, cars, websites, & tech.