Julie Kelly 🇺🇸 Profile picture
Oct 12, 2022 24 tweets 5 min read Read on X
Sentencing hearing now for three members of the Munn family who pleaded guilty to "parading" in the Capitol.

DOJ wants 30 days in jail for the parents and 21 days in jail for their young adult children.

Presiding judge is Chief Judge Beryl Howell. This is part of DOJs evidence: Image
DOJ explaining to judge that the Munns were on social media after Jan 6 to express they were "excited" about what happened. "January 6 was not something people should be excited about," prosecutor says.

Judge interrupts - "proud of?"

Howell asking why adult children...
shouldn't get same jail time as parents.

LOL: Prosecutor wants 3 years probation IN ADDITION to jail so government can make sure the children "get on the straight and narrow" after being misled by their parents by going into the Capitol.

DOJ wants probation into 2024 election.
Howell: Kristi Munn "perpetuated" false information on social media about what happened on January 6. She saw police "bleeding" and using flash grenades.

Howell asking why she deleted social media accounts.

Howell now asking about a photo of Kristi using a 3%er sign, calling...
it a "right wing militia group." Howell demanding to know how Kristi Munn didn't know what it was.

THIS IS HAPPENING IN AMERICA.

Howell is of course an open partisan, hates Trump, and was appointed by Obama. She refers to J6ers as "rioters" even tho no one charged with "riot."
Joshua Munn has now separated himself from his family, his attorney explains.
Howell explains long probation is necessary for the "safety of our democracy, country generally, that they are no longer tempted by politicians to engage in political violence that interrupts the...
the peaceful transition of power or our elections."

No one in the Munn family is accused of attacking police, vandalizing property. In fact, there's evidence they tried to get out, help police, and pick up debris.

Howell also was chief judge overseeing Mueller probe.
Lawyer up now for Kayli Munn. She was 18 at the time, a high school senior. DOJ wants her in jail for 21 days. I can only imagine what her life has been like since this cruel DOJ took aim at her family.

Howell: "Did she follow her father's social media postings before the trip?"
Howell: He was "open" that his plan was to "march" on the U.S. Capitol on Jan 6.

Apparently that's not 1A protected in Howell's courtroom.

Howell now accusing Kayli of lying to FBI. "She claims to have seen antifa? But couldn't explain what antifa looked like? What am I...
supposed to make of that? Seems like she was making stuff up? How seriously was she taking the FBI if she was making stuff up?"

Kayli not charged with lying to the FBI but that isn't stopping Howell from making accusations from the bench.

Howell's comments are purely political.
"There are still a lot of conspiracy theories floating on social media by responsible media" related to Jan 6. People are susceptible to believing "weird stuff."

Public defender agrees, says it's a struggle with his other Jan 6 clients---what's coming from "rational media." LOL
Last year, Howell noted the "parading" charge is a class B misdemeanor, a petty offense, that the DC District Court never before dealt with. But now it consumes the time of the DC court while allowing vile partisans like Howell to berate Trump supporters for their beliefs.
Kristi Munn apologizing to court and the "country" for what she did. "We were not thinking."

Joshua Munn doesn't make a statement. (He submitted a letter to court.)

Kayli Munn: "I want to apologize for my actions that day. My parents raised me to be a good person."
Howell: "What were you trying to do?"

Kayli: Have our voices heard, if the election was "truthful." We wanted to right our wrongs. We had in our heads we were fighting a "monster."

Howell: "Who is the monster? You understand everyone is an American, right?"

Kayli: Yes.
Howell about to sentence. "This is a serious offense even though it's a petty offense. This was a shocking event" that had consequences "around the world."

Howell: What happened on January 6 was NOT first amendment protected speech, it was not legitimate protest, it was a...
CATASTROPHIC security breach of our Capitol with thousands of people with no screening."

Howell raises a DM message by Kayli joking about not getting arrested. Father posted about marching to the US Capitol.

"But it was gonna be wild," Howell says, citing Trump.
Howell erroneously claims police were using "non lethal" weapons to stop the riot. She obviously forgot about Ashli Babbitt. (Her voice just drips with condescension and arrogance.)

"They made themselves at home." Howell walking thru all the Munns' behavior inside the bldg Image
"They were exacerbating a really terrible security breach." Berating Munns for entering and exiting thru a broken window.

Accuses Munns of making "false statements" about what they saw inside the Capitol, discussing FB messages. "These were fighting words after Jan 6...
that has led to misinformation about that day."

LOL, unbelievable.

Howell mocking posts that police started the violence that day. Of course, that's true.

"Joining the mob was not helping the police. They exacerbated a terrible situation for police."
"These 3 defendants had the wrong models to follow on January 6," Howell says, referring to their parents.

Destroy families--that's the Democrats' goal.

"She threw up the bogeymen of Antifa," Howell says of Kayli, the then-18 year old.

Howell disputes that court can...
impose jail time and probation. (This is an issue before other judges.)

Howell: Kristi walked thru the Capitol carrying a "Trump 2020 flag like a super hero cape." She should know better, Howell says?

Howell sentences Kristi Munn to 90 days home confinement, 36 months probation
Howell "appreciates" that Joshua Howell said he didn't want to go to the Trump rally. Here's is his letter. Howell also appreciates that he has distanced himself from his family and their "negative influences."

Joshua gets 36 months probation, $10 fine. Image
Up now Kayli Munn, the high school senior at the time.

Howell notes her speech/debate involvement requires "using common sense and reason. These were not skills I saw demonstrated in evidence on January 6. Those weren't skills during what she said during her FBI interview."
Howell lectures Kayli to use her analytic skills "in her daily life" to make sure she never finds herself before a FEDERAL JUDGE for misdemeanor. Howell laughs at parents' influence.

Howell sentences Kayli to 36 months probation.

Parents will be sentenced later today.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

Julie Kelly 🇺🇸 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @julie_kelly2

Jan 31
So I decided to burn up my PACER account and do random checks on Judge Patrick Schlitz's claims that ICE violated 96 court orders in Minnesota immigration cases this month alone.

"ICE has likely violated more court orders in January 2026 than some federal agencies have violated in their entire existence," Schlitz, without evidence, wrote in a court order this week.

Well--his very first citation does not exist. There is no Jan 24, 2026 court order in Hakan v Noem. There is a Dec. 24, 2025 court order (hard to tell exactly what was "violated" in the judge's order) but Schlitz just misrepresented this case in his own court orderImage
Image
It is very important to note that Minnesota judges have uniformly ordered the immediate release of ALL illegals who have filed habeas petitions. I believe the last court was 60+.

In the process, judges impose unreasonable time limits on the DOJ to respond to petitions then release the illegals claiming the administration did not reply in time.

A total racket.

Now let's turn to Francisco E.O. v. Olson and the cited order that Schlitz claims represents ICE's violation of court orders in Jan 2026.

Would be nice to read it--BUT IT IS SEALED.

Schlitz knows that most habeas docs are sealed so it's impossible for the public to judge for themselves the nature of the judge's accusations.

The docket does, however, reflect some back and forth between this judge and Pam Bondi, resulting in the judge on Jan 29 saying--"although the Respondents willfully violated the Court's Orders [again, we have no idea what this magistrate judge claims in the sealed order], the Court appreciates Respondents' counsel's communication and their efforts to promote Respondents' compliance with the Court's directives. The Court therefore declines to impose any sanctions. This matter therefore shall be closed."Image
OOPS actually--Schlitz in his haste to put together this appendix claiming ICE violated more court orders in Jan 2026 than some federal agencies violate in their entire history (LOL), he double counted the same order.

So out of the 1st 7 cases Schlitz listed--one does not exist and another is counted twice.Image
Read 4 tweets
Jan 23
A few things to note here:

> Jack Smith not only pushed for an unreasonable trial date of Jan 2024, he asked the Supreme Court to take the “extraordinary” step of bypassing the DC appellate court in deciding on Judge Chutkan’s immunity order, which denied all forms of presidential immunity from criminal prosecution. (SCOTUS said no.)

> When Trump’s defense lawyer objected to the hasty trial date due to the massive amount of discovery discussed here, Judge Chutkan said the president should have been reviewing discovery BEFORE the indictment, referring to Jan 6 committee materials. Chutkan something to the effect of, “you knew you were going to be charged you should have prepared ahead of time.”
In his application for cert before SCOTUS, Smith called his J6 indictment against the president an “extraordinary case.” Having Chutkan rule on the unprecedented question of presidential immunity from criminal prosecution in just 7 weeks; oral arguments set by DC appellate 5 weeks later; and DC appellate court opinion upholding Chutkan issued 4 weeks after that was not quick enough for Smith.

In fact, Justice Roberts criticized Chutkan and the appellate court judges for their rush to judgment in such an historic matter.

Smith, as usual, lied about why he sought a hasty trial schedule.Image
This is just a taste of what the president and his lawyers had to deal with before Judge Chutkan.

She spent several minutes arguing with attorney John Lauro about the trial date and voluminous discovery. Not only did Chutkan say repeatedly—you knew this indictment was coming—she suggested he was a bad lawyer for not reading not yet produced discovery before the indictment.

This is from the hearing held 4 weeks after Smith announced the J6 indictment:Image
Read 4 tweets
Jan 22
Chairman Jim Jordan opens Jack Smith hearing with overview of Russiagate, various prosecutions of President Trump, and an account of Smith's unprecedented two criminal indictments against the president.

Notes that Judge Cannon disqualified Smith under the Appointments Clause and how he successfully pushed (thanks to Judge Chutkan) to release a report on the Jan 6 case after the election.
Oh FFS Jamie Raskin opens his statement by acknowledging the attendance of the 4 J6 celeb cops including Mike Fanone and Harry Dunn.

It is truly unfortunate those lying clowns haven't been charged with perjury.

Raskin now swooning over Smith's resume--I am sure he will omit SCOTUS' 8-0 reversal of Smith's case against the McDonnells.
Raskin calls Judge Cannon a "sychophant" for not permitting the release of Smith's report on the documents case. Raskin claims Smith cannot talk about the docs case due to those orders however Smith has already openly talked about the case.
Read 6 tweets
Jan 6
Sen. Rand Paul just published records showing the FBI's two-year surveillance of an American citizen suspected of entering the Capitol on Jan 6. The spying included physical surveillance of her home and movements; she, like thousands of others were placed on a TSA "terror" watch list...Image
Christine Crowder is a Catholic school teacher and her husband a federal air marshal. Paul released 70 pages of docs related to the FBI's full throated investigation into an innocent American.

Just imagine how many times this happened--and not just to J6ers--under Chris Wray: Image
Outrageously--DC US Attorney Matt Graves wanted to pursue a criminal prosecution of Crowder DESPITE the FBI finally admitting it did not have enough evidence to bring a case against Crowder.

Why Graves is still off the hook for his handling of J6 prosecution in beyond me: Image
Read 5 tweets
Dec 31, 2025
NEW: Jack Smith's transcript released.

🧵on his misrepresentations, falsehoods, and straight up lies told by the special counsel to House Judiciary Committee on Dec 17.

Smith had no evidence that any of the so-called "classified documents" he claimed to have found were in boxes temporarily stored in MAL ballroom or bathroom after the president left the White House.Image
Lie #2:

Smith was extremely aware of the 2024 election calendar--which is why he took what he himself described as the "extraordinary" step in asking the Supreme Court to bypass the DC appellate court--the next normal step-- in considering Judge Chutkan's Dec. 2023 order denying all forms of presidential immunity from criminal prosecution and take up the immunity question immediately. (SCOTUS denied his request, Chutkan's order was upheld by 3-judge panel in Feb. 2024, which was then considered by SCOTUS in April. On July 1, 2024, SCOTUS issued its decision providing for a broad swath of immunity for acts in office, resulting in a major gutting of Smith's J6 indictment.)Image
Lie #3: That the unarmed protest at the Capitol on Jan 6 was an "attack" incited by the president and the still unsubstantiated allegation that 140 officers were injured by protesters.

Keep in mind: Smith's J6 indictment was four counts: two related to 1512(c)(2)--a corporate fraud statute unlawfully used in J6 cases according to SCOTUS in the Fischer decision--and two other VERY vague conspiracy counts, conspiracy to defraud and conspiracy against "rights."Image
Image
Read 7 tweets
Nov 19, 2025
Hearing about to start in Jeb Boasberg courtroom as the embattled judge resumes contempt proceedings against the Trump DOJ related to Alien Enemies Act
declassified.live/p/the-contempt…
Boasberg says appellate court gave him permission to "go forward" with another contempt inquiry.

Authorized to pursue a criminal contempt factual finding against the Trump DOJ, which he is "preparing" to do as he did "seven months ago." (His April 2025 probable cause finding was vacated but the appellate court kicked the matter back to him to start over.

Boasberg says there are "new developments" since his first determination and raises allegations by Erez Reuvini, the so called DOJ "whistleblower" who accused former acting DAG Emil Bove of saying the DOJ might have to say "fuck you" to the courts. Boasberg says Reuvini might be called as a witness as the judge plans to require testimony from various parties.

"I believe justice requires me to move promptly on this."
Lee Gelernt, ACLU attorney representing illegal Venezuelans covered by AEA.

DOJ prosecutor - "the government objects to criminal contempt proceedings." Boasberg immediately grills prosecutor as to whether he believes the full DC appellate court gave him permission to restart contempt inquiry.

"I will be going forward with it," Boasberg.

Boasberg says he will seek testimony from those who "defied" his order to return planes carrying AEA subjects on the evening of March 15. The problem for Boasberg is the directive represented an "oral order" that was not reflected in his later written order.

He wants proposals from both sides by Monday on how to proceed including a list of witnesses in his fact finding exercise including Reuvini and Drew Ensign, the DOJ who represented the government during early stage of litigation.

"I certainly intend to find out what happened that day."
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(