“The AMA already has serious concerns about #PBM business practices that can have a detrimental impact on patients’ access to and cost of prescription drugs.”
The analysis thus assessed market competition for those 3 PBM services.
6/ At the national level, the analysis found that a handful of #PBMs have a large collective market share for the three PBM services most used by insurers:👇
7/ At both the state and metropolitan levels, the analysis found a high degree of market concentration for each the three PBM services assessed by the study:👇
8/ The analysis also quantified the extent of vertical integration between health insurers and PBMs.
An insurer is vertically integrated with a PBM when a PBM service is performed in house or supplied by a PBM that shares ownership with the insurer.
Findings:👇
9/ According to the analysis, “even though the largest health insurers and PBMs are vertically integrated, there is still a significant portion of the market that remains not vertically integrated, particularly at the local level."
10/Vertically integrated insurers may not allow non-vertically integrated insurer competitors to access their PBMs or they could raise the cost of those PBM services.
❗️This could adversely affect non-vertically integrated insurers & ultimately patients through higher premiums.
11/ The analysis of competition in commercial #PBM service markets adds to the @AmerMedicalAssn’s work to shine a light on market consolidation in the health insurance industry.
12/ Protecting patients and physicians from anticompetitive harm will continue to be a vital issue of public policy for the @AmerMedicalAssn, the federation of medicine, and the nation’s physicians.
13/ The @AmerMedicalAssn website offers additional information on #OurAMA’s efforts against anti-competitive mergers.
🚨As AMA’s representative to the HL7 Da Vinci Project Clinical Advisory Council (CAC), I ask that you please take urgent action.
Your participation could be the difference between meaningful improvements to prior authorization (PA) and little change.
Details in🧵
#FixPriorAuth
2/ **ISSUE OF CONCERN:
🔥On the PA and burden reduction use-case calls, some payers and EHR vendors are advocating that PA users should be back-office staff only, not clinicians based on their understanding and experiences.
3/
❗️Reliance on back-office is not the original intent of Da Vinci PA use-case design.
The goal was to have a clinician-oriented process that renders real time coverage information at the time of clinical decision and ordering to inform more timely and efficient PA workflows.
2/ AMA reports on the 10 largest PBMs & drug insurers nationally, summarizes concentration levels (HHIs) in their markets, & describes the extent of vertical integration of insurers with PBMs.
With ⬇️ competition & ⬆️ consolidation, patients could face ⬆️ costs & ⬇️ choices.
3/ The largest PBMs dominate a critical part of health care.
📍The 4 largest PBMs have a collective national market share of 67%.
📍OptumRx is the largest PBM (22.2% market share), followed by CVS Health (18.9%), Express Scripts (15.5%), & Prime Therapeutics (10.6%).
2/ Wasteful and Inappropriate Service Reduction (WISeR) Model is a “…substantial shift in the traditional Medicare program’s approach to utilization management (UM) and prior authorization (PA)…potential for unintended consequences that could harm both patients and physicians.”
3/“…pathways represent significant departures from current standards & seem to conflict with CMS’ recent, highly laudable achievement of securing a commitment from the health insurance industry to fix the broken PA process, to include [⬇️] the overall volume of PA requirements.”
🚨On 7/14/2025, CMS released the proposed rule for the 2026 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Proposed Rule:
AMA identifies items for immediate attention as staff analyzes and develops a detailed summary of the nearly 2,000-page proposal. tinyurl.com/2p9t7w9x
2/🔹Conversion Factors (CF): Effects of MACRA, H.R. 1, Budget Neutrality
👉 MACRA Effect:
•Permanent 0.75% update for Medicare payments to QPs in advanced APMs
•Permanent 0.25% update for Medicare payments to all physicians who are not QPs, including MIPS-eligible clinicians
3/ Conversion Factors
👉 MACRA Effect:
•Physicians who are qualifying participants (QPs) in advanced APMs will receive a slightly ⬆️ CF update and, thus, slightly ⬆️ Medicare payments in 2026 compared to physicians who are not QPs.
🚨CMS issued updates to its Risk Adjustment Data Validation (RADV) audit process aimed at strengthening oversight of Medicare Advantage (MA) payments to ensure accurate reflections of enrollees’ health status.
AMA has concerns about potential administrative burden on physicians.
2/ 🚨If you experience any new challenges related to increased RADV audit activity, the AMA encourages you to share your feedback with AMA to ensure they properly represent your concerns with the administration. Contact: Jamal.Bowleg@ama-assn.org
3/ Under the updated RADV framework, CMS will now audit all eligible MA contracts (approximately 550) annually.
Additionally, CMS aims to increase the number of records audited per plan from 35 to up to 200 per year.
“Many physicians fear the #healthinsurance industry’s use of unregulated #artificialintelligence (#AI) automation and predictive technologies will increasingly override good medical judgment and systematically deny #patients coverage for necessary #medicalcare. “🧵
2/ “According to a new survey from @AmerMedicalAssn, 3️⃣ in 5️⃣ physicians (61%) are concerned that health plans’ use of AI is increasing prior auth denials, exacerbating avoidable patient harms and escalating unnecessary waste now and into the future.”
@AmerMedicalAssn 3/ “Burdensome #priorauthorization requirements that conflict with evidence-based clinical practices & create hurdles to patient access to safe, timely, & affordable treatment have been a major impediment to patient care for decades.”