🪡: #DeppVsHeard is an entirely separate case from #JolieVsPitt. Those wielding misogyny in either case do not represent many of us who drew conclusions based on evidence, not gender. There are malicious players when cases like these are public & high-profile (1/?)
https://twitter.com/anyazoledz/status/1580924746811977729
🪡: Twitter is not representative of the general population. Those who have decided to vilify Ms. Jolie without examining the claims, any evidence, previous allegations, and all prior to the case being tried in any capacity are glomming onto troll-behaviors and tactics (2/?)
🪡: They do not represent everyone who has an opinion on the case nor do they represent everyone who believes the Defendant (Ms. Heard) is a malicious defamer. Not believing the Defendant and not believing Ms. Jolie are not mutually exclusive (3/?)
🪡: Drawing the equivalency is so incredibly harmful and could potentially do more damage and perpetuate some of this vile behavior. The only people doing this are trolls, who don’t represent a majority of the population who examine things objectively and draw conclusions (4/?)
🪡: & MSM. If this is the narrative they wish to perpetuate, then continue to draw these equivalencies and irrelevant, harmful connections, whilst negating the reasons why the Defendant has been so heinously vilified (which I don’t condone, but do understand the reasoning) (5/5).
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
